dark light

Robbo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 756 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Welcome Back Tangmere1940, Charlie Hunt And Mark12 (merged) #1014304
    Robbo
    Participant

    Welcome back.

    We’re missing one wingman. Hope Mark12 reappears from his sortie.

    Oh, do catch up, BR. He posted at 10:14 http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=121118

    in reply to: Welcome Back Tangmere1940, Charlie Hunt And Mark12 (merged) #1014465
    Robbo
    Participant

    All these different threads, all this disorder……. Blue Robin will be dusting off his thread merging mallet after a year of slumber.

    in reply to: Burma Spitfire Blog @ World of Tanks #1014696
    Robbo
    Participant

    Welcome back Peter. It’s good to see that common sense has prevailed.

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #1015293
    Robbo
    Participant

    Tim, please tell me you haven’t just dug up the coffin of a pet budgie named Merlin……

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #1016088
    Robbo
    Participant

    So, given a day to consider the situation, has anything happened?

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #939949
    Robbo
    Participant

    David, so do I. I’ve received a letter from the lawyers of a national newspaper regarding content posted on a forum I administer. Nobody got banned, nobody got upset and it was wrapped up very quickly with all sides happy.

    Key Publishing does have the option of telling the organisation that in the interests of their readers who are members they’ll give both sides a say and publish the findings in Flypast. It would be a useful bargaining chip. If the organisation has nothing to hide, why not take the opportunity to quash any misinformation that’s out there?

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #939999
    Robbo
    Participant

    David, how about the option of pulling the thread and contacting those concerned to respectfully ask them not to revive it until there’d been time to consult the lawyers? I think that the “Spitfire 3” had earned that much respect, don’t you? Banning them from discussing all subjects on here is knee-jerk to say the least, and quite frankly, it’s insulting.

    My first reaction would be to say that if I was an existing member, I’d walk, but that doesn’t help to bring the organisation back to its core purpose and stem the depletion of funds on what appear to be personal ambitions. Change needs to come from within rather than the patrons walking en-masse. If the organisation isn’t balanced by reason, the recent losses could just be the start.

    in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #940175
    Robbo
    Participant

    An organisation acting like this to prevent the discussion of information that’s already in the public domain encourages people to doubt their motives for getting heavy-handed.

    I’m very disappointed that the management at Key Publishing didn’t support the people they chose to ban.

    in reply to: General Discussion #274852
    Robbo
    Participant

    ” that you haver mastered ”

    It’s spelt haven’t and neither have you. Perhaps the forum could implement an auto spell checker with it’s next update?

    Since the intransitive verb “haver” has been around since at least 1866 an auto spell check wouldn’t be the best way of identifying this typo. Or were you just stooping from your lofty pedestal to have a pop?

    Perhaps your time would have been better spent learning about the apostrophe?

    in reply to: Problems with the forum SW #1873274
    Robbo
    Participant

    ” that you haver mastered ”

    It’s spelt haven’t and neither have you. Perhaps the forum could implement an auto spell checker with it’s next update?

    Since the intransitive verb “haver” has been around since at least 1866 an auto spell check wouldn’t be the best way of identifying this typo. Or were you just stooping from your lofty pedestal to have a pop?

    Perhaps your time would have been better spent learning about the apostrophe?

    in reply to: Red Tails DVD #952665
    Robbo
    Participant

    Let’s not forget Red Baron from a couple of years ago….

    I think it’s better forgotten.

    in reply to: Red Tails DVD #952720
    Robbo
    Participant

    It’s good to see aviation themed films getting made, but I wish the film industry didn’t do such a poor job of it. Flyboys was the last cringingly bad new aviation I saw. They went to the trouble to study the physics of a Jungmann’s flight and then threw all that realism away when they substituted the usual x-wing fighter flight physics and inexhaustable ammo scenario that they appear to have used in Red Tails.

    in reply to: Will Spitfire Survivors Vol II Be… #958725
    Robbo
    Participant

    It’s probably going to get a bit fatter than it was originally planned to be.

    in reply to: General Discussion #276842
    Robbo
    Participant

    Went to London, saw a boat.

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8480/8209604386_fea8e2ed39_b.jpg
    Cutty_Sark_7420 by shuttleworthpix, on Flickr

    in reply to: Non Aviation Photo Thread part Deux #1875225
    Robbo
    Participant

    Went to London, saw a boat.

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8480/8209604386_fea8e2ed39_b.jpg
    Cutty_Sark_7420 by shuttleworthpix, on Flickr

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 756 total)