I thought that Cameron had already waived the VAT. This article seems to suggest that he has.
‘This is in addition to £1million that the Government has already contributed towards the VAT costs of the construction of the memorial.’
I see the knicker wetting is full swing then! :rolleyes:
Considering you’re the person who started “Will it be at Legends?” all those years ago, you’d know all about Legends linen soiling.
Have faith, it’ll be a great show if the weather doesn’t intervene to mess things up.
http://forum.keypublishing.com/member.php?u=4306
He’s a member here too
Someone’s been watching Reggie Perrin.
Someone’s been watching Reggie Perrin.
Time to stock up the station armoury methinks….
Wasn’t the visitor centre once the station armoury?
Time to stock up the station armoury methinks….
Wasn’t the visitor centre once the station armoury?
There are already at least two Flickr groups covering this subject:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/aircraft_engines/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/1612530@N24/
I will be at Duxford from Friday morning.
I’ll keep a lookout for your chromed head.
(PS – isn’t the freckle cream jar a very old story, anyway…? I also note that the turtle has crept back onto the scene again.)
Can turtles even get freckles?
See post #21 this thread
Have you read that post? Are you suggesting that the engines removed from the last pre-restoration flight will now be acceptable for flight use? If so, why weren’t they retained?
BF dictates examine intakes for fod -not really sure how you could make it better?
It’s already been suggested that if you stick anything into an intake, whether it’s a dessicant bag or a sack of pickled frogs, a tag visible from the ground provides a useful hint that it’s still in there that can not only be seen by the person responsible for checking the intakes, but to everyone on the ground who looks at the intakes.
I would imagine there’s a fairly good set of rules that they adhere to.
But not good enough rules to prevent this or adhered to with the consistency to avoid it.
At least one of the two serviceable engines that are currently installed (perhaps both?) will have been in situ since she flew in 2007. It’s likely to have used up a good chunk of its 200 hours, so this is likely to be the limiting factor on future operations even if there are no other unexpected incidents.
Bearing this limitation in mind, surely it’s going to choke off donations for what’s likely to be a much shorter lifespan in the air?
John posted an excellent account of building the FE.2b on the aerodrome http://www.theaerodrome.com/forum/replica-aircraft/42004-my-fe2b-reproduction.html