But those pictures were so poor and grainy that I decided it really wouldn’t be fair to use them.

Don’t worry, aa – Moze has a cellarful of photos like that and never fails to use them – especially when it gets hot in Texas and that makes him what they call ‘ornery’….

Dearie me, it’s gone quiet. Funny thing is, this company made gliders of the other sort (i.e. the boring ones) too…..but here’s another view.

Oh dear, I think we’re going to get bogged down in the quagmire of Soviet aircraft designations here…

The NIAI,(or LIG), LIG-10, or SKh-1, or Bedunkovich CX-1, depending on which book you’re reading at the time !

(I’m not an expert on what we call here Acrylic script, but could SKh-1 be the same as CX-1?)

Thank you, Thomas.

I was not around when this picture was taken…….

I’ll have to declare OH as I am departing for a short holiday..

Correct, RAB, over to you..

Think it’s the LeO 21

Fascinating stuff. I am perplexed by the A.W. designations and maybe an expert out there can help. The same aircraft is called F.K.12 by J M Bruce, but the machine in the post differs from any I have seen before by apparently having two paired sets of mainwheels in tandem. Is this correct ?