Yes indeed RAB. Over to you.
Thank you – without the heavy hints I would have struggled – seen its younger brother many times at East Fortune but didn’t catch on to this one.
Here’s a rather smart fighter….
Right, I’ll rise to the bait, AA, seeing this is on my home patch.
Would this be the Kay 32/1 gyroplane made approximately 12 miles from here in Perth ?
Think you’ll find this was the culprit….
Think you’ll find this was the culprit….
Yessir, a Brazilian girl…… over to you.
Very much a contemporary of the above, this rather attractive biplane trainer….
Breda 79S minus its spats ?
Thanks, James for the explanation – publishing must indeed be a hazardous business these days.
Fortunately, I managed to acquire the Lysander book (for a bit more than the cover price !) but it can be frustrating for a newbie trying to build up a collection.
Good luck with future publications.
You are absolutely right about JK’s magnificent Lysander book – but no point trying to plug it – copies are about as elusive as the Putnam Miles !!
(I once asked Mushroom why they didn’t reprint copies of several of their books, which were obviously in great demand, and got a ho-hum sort of reply. Strange)
And more thanks from me – a fascinating exposition, gentlemen.
For reference, more detailed information on the Milan is found in ‘Prototypes de l’Aviation Française 1945-1960’ by Jean-Claude Fayer.
Perhaps one of you chaps from Gaul could explain to this ignorant Brit how the prototype managed to appear in two registrations, i.e. F-WCZZ and F-BCZZ ?
You’ve either got better software or a better magnifying glass than me, wilkofife!
Sorry, a/a, I am being a bit of a smartass here – this machine is familiar to me because I posted it elsewhere some time ago……..
F-***Z, nest-ce pas ???
The Texan has rumbled the Spaniard. Over to Moze…….