I have seen photos of Al Ghardabia, the other Koni class corvette, which was hit by air attacks – but apparently not sunk, but only damaged.
Let’s be honest the only people that want only 1 properly fitted out is the treasury.
You are sure? The last election won a party, which promised reduced taxes – which does not fit to increased spending in defence (which is also one of the big contradictions in the “small government” approach of the US Republicans, who wants a big military…).
If you consider the big cuts in Britain for many urgently needed stuff, there are probably also many more, who consider a carrier not be urgently needed.
You mean the 2 that look like off-shore supply ships?
Yes, I was wondering, if these are off-shore supply ships – or built for the navy.
From Broadsword’s blog
Which ships are on the photo? Are these Kolkata, Kochi, and Chennai (P15A destroyers)? And which are the two ships behind?
Here some photos – not showing the ex Varyag, but PLAN destroyers and frigates:
They were also rumours that also the French government was bribed – obviously successful, if they pay 72.5% of the bill…
The Kang Ding class has not only obsolete AAW weapons, but there were also reports that the software does not fit to the non-French weapons.
Wasn’t the 1164 called Krasina or something by NATO initially?
Yes, before the name of the first ship was known.
Also, 1164 is Atlant 😉 .
For sure, the Russian project name is Project 1164 Atlant. But it is still the Slava class, because the first ship was named Slava, when she was commissioned 😉
Slava is not one of the typical NATO names (as Kashin, Kara, Kresta etc. are).
Or give another example: the German Brandenburg class is officially called F123 class, still Brandenburg class is very often used.
If you are referring to TR1’s launch images, Leon, the missile isn’t P-20M it is a P-500 variant. The ship is one of the 1164’s. Even if the size and arrangement of the weapon doesn’t give this away the fast check is the number of boosters – P-20M has a single ventral booster.
Ah, I thought that this was a BrahMos, because it was mentioned in the postings above repeatedly. Rajput has two of it’s P-20 launchers replaced by twin launchers for BrahMos.
But you are right, this is a Project 1164 (Slava class) cruiser. The combination of AK-130, two AK-630 superfiring and the RBU-6000 (?) is unique.
Is this Rajput? The other ships of this class probably still have all P-20M launchers?
The first Chinese warships for the PLAN were built decades ago, but the first ships with modern, western derived equipment were the type 052 destroyers and the late Type 053 frigates (053H3). They should have been the turning point. Exported ships are certainly something different, because they are usually not built and equipped to the same standards.
Unfortunately, I do not know why all modern European ship have this communication mast 🙁
If you try to pack them in like sardines as in WW2 and earlier, you won’t have anyone signing up for a second tour.
There are also other problems – see the Typ 42 Batch 1 and 2 destroyers, which have problems with seaworthiness, no possibilities for refit etc.
Here are some photos of Carlo Bergami:
http://www.betasom.it/forum/lofiversion/index.php?t31988.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rassegnamilitare/sets/72157626014242496/with/5432264808/
There should be more recent ones??
The problem is that destroyers and frigates have got so big and so expensive that only very few can be afforded.
The most expensive part of the ship is certainly not their hull, but their combat systems, weapons electronics, the automation etc. The price for the quality of the ships is very high – and this reduces quantity. No navy could afford today the numbers they had e.g. 100 or 50 years ago.
This would also raise questions, why someone with obvious psychological problems was responsible to guard the boat. Actually it would have been necessary to watch the guard…
I guess that the next captain of HMS Astute will loose his job.
I would considered it very problematic that an armed employee of the state behave that way – but it is even more problematic that this happened on submarine with an very dangerous and risky propulsion.