I know a.net is not exactly the fountain of all knowledge but someone was saying over there the other day that Boeing had announced improved range on the 772LR in a press released. Apparently the new range would allow for a LHR-SYD non stop flight.
I must say something about this though. This is where the infamous “4 engines 4 long haul” might play into people’s minds. I know that twin-engine jets are infinitely more reliable nowadays, and besides you’re never that far from land in the LHR-SYD route. But nonetheless such ultra long range flights on a 2 engine plane might be contemplated with apprehension by a proportion of the travelling public.
Apparently Boeing have updated upwards the range of their 772LR (the exact figure escapes me at the moment) and theoretically the plane would be able to do LHR-SYD non-stop.
Now all they have to do is get someone to buy the thing :p
And not a single mention of the aircraft’s make and model in that article… I blame Rupert Murdoch
π
Thanks for the info!
Boeing aren’t bringing much are they? Are they just going to put a 7e7 interior mock up or something? You would’ve thought they would at least want to bring in a 773ER…
It’s back online now but you can tell it’s been offline for a while. The civil aviation forum, which usually has 1500 or so posts during the last 24 hours, shows only 190…
I know very little about commercial aviation economics but Iβd imagine if they can fill the plane it’s probably quite profitable and with less costs than those associated with bigger aircraft.
As a very rough estimate, business class rates for crossing the Pond are about 8-10 times higher than economy. So a corporate A319 or 737 could bring as much revenue as a widebody but with lower fuel and maintenance costs.
Filling the aircraft would be a different matter thoughβ¦
Great news.
The A380 will be the perfect aircraft for the route, especially if Branson keeps its promise to keep the airplane spacious and introduce new onboard facilities.
Any chance of pulling the same trick at the Area 51 airfield? π
As the risk of tailstrikes go, you have to wonder how many close shaves occur with this bird.
There can’t be that much room for manoeuvre there!
How do you get to sit backwards on a civil a/c (eg a southwest 737) unless you’re crew? All the seats on flights I’ve been on have facing forward.
For some reason the front row on our 737 was fitted backwards. There were 4 of us and we were facing each other- it almost felt like being on a train and the only thing missing was a table in the middle.
Funny airline, Southwest. Stewardesses wear jeans and trainers and if memory serves seats ain’t reserved- you grab any available seat you want.
I’ve flown ‘backwards’ once, on a Southwest 737, and I had a fab time.
Take off in particular was very enjoyable, almost like being on a thrill ride- though it was probably just the novelty of it.
Looks plain ugly… Even the Beluga is more elegant.
It’ll look rather different once is completed frankvw…

My boss is a Virgin Gold card holder and he was invited to go on one of the follow-up boats right behind Branson. It was lots of fun apparently…
Apparently first flight is scheduled for January 2005.
Wouldn’t mind going to the Paris Air Show next year then. π
All very nice pictures of very fine aircraft. Thanks!