Probably with the late Air Commodore Allan Wheeler at the controls. He was the Shuttleworth Aviation trustee at that time and an acknowledged expert with the Avro 504. His displays were models of their kind with only the minimum of “G” loading needed to achieve the desired result.
A real gentleman with a phenomenal background in vintage and veteran aeroplanes. His books are still well worth a read.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π
One further question before I shut up. What was the origin of the falling leaf – was it the result of evasive action in WW1 airfighting battles or is there some other history?
Wicked Willip :diablo:
Probably discovered by a ham fisted student at the Gosport School of Flying during WW1 when trying to recover from the incipient stage of a spin entry in an Avro 504 and it flicked the other way a couple of times. Would have woken the instructor from his drowsing, of that I am certain.
I remember students doing the same in Tiger Moths with me in the early 1960’s. Mind you, I was not drowsing.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π
She came up to a BWPA rally at Little Snoring in the late 1950’s along with some other ex-ATA women pilots. It was indeed a priviledge to meet them. They all seemed to be such modest women yet their work in WW2 was vital in ensuring the aircraft were collected and delivered. As Lettice Curtis entitled her excellent book – “The Forgotten Pilots”, so true, so very true.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π
NTSB: Pilots Weren’t In Formation In OSH Landing Accident
Says Race Aircraft Were Landing Separately
The National Transportation Safety Board released Wednesday its Preliminary Report on last Friday’s tragic landing accident at Wittman Field in Oshkosh, WI during AirVenture 2007.
As ANN reported, pilot Gerard Beck was killed when his P-51A — which he built himself, using North American’s original plans and blueprints — struck the tail of a P-51D that had just touched down on runway 36 at Wittman Field. Both aircraft had participated in a simulated air race demonstration.
The prelim — which follows, unedited but for formatting, below — notes the aircraft were not attempting a formation landing, as many had speculated. Rather, it appears Beck may not have seen the P-51D’s location on the runway, resulting in the landing collision.
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.
On July 27, 2007, at 1519 central daylight time, a North American P51-D, Mustang, N151RJ, sustained substantial damage during landing when it was struck in the empennage and fuselage by an amateur-built Beck P-51A, Mustang, N8082U. N151RJ had just landed on runway 36 (8,002 feet by 150 feet, grooved concrete) at the Wittman Regional Airport (OSH), Oshkosh, Wisconsin, and was starting its landing roll when N8082U struck its empennage and fuselage.
The collision with N8082U pushed N151RJ onto its nose, and N151RJ subsequently skidded down the runway and came to rest about 788 feet from the initial impact point. N8082U was still airborne at the time of the collision, and it rolled over to the right of the aft fuselage of N151RJ and impacted the terrain in a wings level, inverted attitude. The pilot in N151RJ was not injured, and the pilot in N8082U received fatal injuries.
Both Mustang airplanes departed from OSH as part of a five-aircraft air race demonstration event at the EAA AirVenture 2007 air show. The demonstration air race was completed and the five aircraft were in the process of landing separately, and not in formation, on runway 36.
Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accid
FMI: http://www.ntsb.gov
We shall see what emerges but on the face of it the pilot of the P51A never saw the close proximity of the P51D until it was far too late to do anything. The view forward in the Mustang is very poor in the landing attitude.
I wonder what the view was like from the OSH tower where the EAA “Air Boss” crew were supervising the airshow activity. During the display period the FAA controllers hand over “control” to the EAA volunteer air boss team.
A real tragedy that might have been avoided so very easily.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π
Mais un Rallye est suelement un parachute de tin n’est pa? π
D’accord et maintenant je termine le Franglais…………!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cheers,
trapper 69
:dev2:
Saw someone do it in a Rallye, probably at an RAF Finningley show in the late 70s or early 80s, but I haven’t got a clue who it was.
Mon Dieu, quelle spectacle. Un Rallye fabrique le descente parachutale avec le pilote aliΓ©nΓ©, je pense.
Felicitations,
Trapper 69
:diablo:
Rob68 –
I flew in nearly all the Weston Park shows organised by the Barnstormers Flying Circus at the request of the Earl and Countess of Bradford. Types I flew there included the Tiger Moth, Nipper, Stampe, Chipmunk and Evan VP1 Volksplane. We usually operated from a strip on site but sometimes from RAF Cosford, only 5 miles or so down the road.
The, then, Earl was president of the British Tree Society or whatever the correct title is. The park had mature examples of virtually every species of tree found in the UK with a huge number from abroad. He was quite paranoid about the possibility of our hitting one of his prized trees and so were we. At times the low excess power available, slope, tailwind, temperature and humidity meant having to make a tortuous flight path to go through rather than over the foliage. This was especially so for the Tiger with a girl on the wing.
I also did an aerobatic display there in the early 1980’s in Pitts S2E G-BKTC. In this case there was some speculation as to whether the organiser, not the BFC, was going to do a moonlight flit. A situation rare but not unknown in the airshow world. The strip length was fragile for the type but I just managed to stop when landing uphill. A wretched manhole which protruded some 4 inches above the surrounding grass but impossible to see from the cockpit marked the effective strip limit. Without stopping the engine I grabbed the dosh, turned 180 degrees and departed downhill. Phew…..!!!
Another triumph of luck and skill overcoming sound airmanship.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π
Anna Walker is indeed a highly accomplished aerobatic display pilot in the Jungmann or Jungmeister. Another pilot whose displays enthrall me is Richard Picken with his Jungmann.
Brian Lecomber along with John Connor and John Harper from Firebird Aerobatics used to thrill all of us purists with magical displays in the Stampe G-AYWT in past years. Now sadly missed. I too remember that lyrical Woburn show in what was described as a “Frog Moth”…………!!!!!!!!!!!!!! As a solo slot in the Rothmans Aerobatic team in the early 1970’s the displays by Manx Kelly in the SV4B were excellent. Peter Kynsey, Brian Smith, Carl Schofield, Roger Graham, Chris Jesson and Brendan O’Brien all did superb displays in the Tiger Club Stampes.
The Omaka display described by JDK was by the expert from the Cromwell Aircraft Company at Mandeville, near Gore in South Island, NZ. His name is Ryan Southam and he came second to Brian Zeederburg in the DeHMC Woburn International Tiger Moth aerobatic competition in 2005. His displays show off the limited repertoire of the Tiger to good effect.
I wonder how many of us recall that great exponent of Jungmeister aerobatics, the late Roy Legg. His shows were a pleasure to watch 30 odd years ago.
For me the memorable top class vintage biplane pilots were seen at the various Lockheed Trophy meetings nearly 50 years ago. Names like Marcel Charollais, le Chevalier D’Orgeix, Reine Lacour, Charles Boddington, Neil Williams, Peter Phillips, Nick Pocock, Gerard Verette, Roland Lonchambon, Juan-Luis Aresti and Albert Reusch come quickly to mind. All quite brilliant on their day. Even I did quite well occasionally, by a fluke, when it all gelled.
Happy memories.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π
Shades of Neil Williams in MH434 at a Barnstormers Air Show there in the mid 1970’s.
The proximity of the trees and the rising ground make for a challenging venue at low level as I know well. The adrenaline expended during many of my display slots certainly came close to marking my linen.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π
PS – In the last photo the ack-ack fire seems to have been somewhat late if it was to deter Charlies fast passes.
As has been said, the falling leaf is a series of incipient spins in alternate directions. The art is to stop the wing drop in each direction equally. That is very much up to practice and knowing the individual aeroplane. I have always done them in low wing loading biplanes during displays but the figure can be flown in the Chipmunk if a modicum of power is left on.
The big problem is that the figure is a real height burner if continued for more than three cycles. All the preferred aircraft have a limited ability to regain the energy expended without a very boring and protracted climb to regain height.
I suppose this gives the crowd time for a leak, a carpet burger or an ice cream so perhaps the period so frustrating for the pilot is actually appreciated by those who pay to attend the show. Always look on the bright side of life…… de dum, de dum……….!!!!!!!
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π
PS – That superb book written by Oliver Stewart in the 1920’s entitled “Aerobatics” contains descriptions of the falling leaf and, even more bizarre, the inverted falling leaf. All the illustrations in the book terminate the figures barely a wingspan above ground level……….!!!!
I have no comment on the standard of moderation on the forum except to say thanks for doing a thankless task so well. This despite the dyspeptic aside from Damien B whose photographic talents are superb but who does have a tendency to pontificate. All from a person whose experience in matters aeronautical might be considered somewhat limited.
Now to the point –
The idea of two threads in cases like this is excellent and has my full support for the following reasons.
Condolence threads are often appreciated by those who mourn the loss of a family member or good personal friend. They enable folk who have known the individual from the other side of the crowd line to express their sadness and thanks for past performances. I see nothing to justify deleting such a thread.
Discussion threads just might prevent a repeat tragedy. It is a long time before the official investigation process publishes any report. In that period the airshow season continues. It might be that reading a discussion thread just might cause an individual pilot, engineer, operator or airshow organiser to review their own circumstances and make any appropriate modifications. Surely this is to be encouraged in the interests of aviation safety.
Well thats my six pennyworth.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
:confused:
What an excellent idea from “bager1968”
Any investigation AAIB or NTSC takes a long time before publication though the NTSC do release a preliminary report very soon afterwards. The French take more time still and the Spanish seem to take forever.
There is no doubt that some folk feel better for delving into possible causal factors or, on the other hand, others for restating their opposition to aircraft being flown in airshows, either with a gentle touch or more aggressively. Many genuinely feel that little is to be gained from inexpert speculation and that those who have been bereaved should not inadvertently read a comment from a well meaning forum member that might intensify their grief.
Perhaps the mods might mull over the idea and possibly implement it in future?
Cheers,
Trapper 69
:confused:
One thing is for sure and that is the fact that all Display Authorised pilots across the world who view this forum will grieve for those who mourn. They will also have taken this tragedy as a chance to mentally review their own display profiles for any sign of a similar problem. Forewarned is forearmed.
Cheers,
Trapper 69
π‘
Sad news indeed.
Trapper 69
π
_________________________________-
http://www.thenorthwestern.com/apps/pbcs.d…H/70727175/1987
Quote:
One dead in AirVenture warbird crash when two planes collide; afternoon airshow suspended
One person was killed Friday afternoon when two warbirds collided on the south end of the north-south runway at Wittman Regional Airport.
Witnesses on the AirVenture grounds reported seeing two P-51 Mustangs approach the southern end of Runway 18/36 for what appeared to be a formation landing when the propeller of one Mustang caught the tail of the other, flipping it onto its nose. The aircraft in the rear tried to pull around the crashed aircraft and flipped over in the process, witnesses said.
One plane is covered with a tarp and appears to be upside down in grass east of the runway. The other plane came to a stop with its nose down, about 100 feet north of the other plane.
The pilot of the aircraft that ended up on its nose was able to walk away from the crash, witnesses reported.
The National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation Administration are both investigating the crash.
The afternoon AirVenture air show has been cancelled, EAA spokesman Dick Knapinski said.
The Northwestern will update this story as it develops.
hedonism not paganism
Hedonism indeed.
Having chortled at the video last night I looked in the mirror this morning and thought “if the PFA Rally is to be like this either I am never going again or I will have to go on a serious weight reduction programme”.
Thought for those who promote high-viz jackets that have an apt comment on the back to the effect that they are wearing this item to cover someone elses a**e. How about concealing your own………????????????
Cheers,
Trapper 69
:confused: