‘In the earlly part of the war there were two patterns A and B schemes. Usually odd numbered aircraft had the B scheme although my fathers Blenheim had the A scheme and an odd serial number (R3891) even serial numbers had a mirror image of the B scheme called the A scheme!’
http://forums.diecast-aviation.eu/showthread.php?t=3860
PK724 Nov. 4, 1954-1961, RAF Norton, gate guard
http://www.warbirdregistry.org/spitregistry/spitfire-pk724.html
Airplane damage: Substantial
http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20071220-1
The third photo is Chipmunk VH-BBK, Does anyone know its military history?
C1/0226
Royal Air Force (RAF) as WD287
Royal Malaysian Air Force as FM1022
9M-ANI
Singapore Flying Club 9V-BAE (http://www.cnapg.org/zchipmunkc10226.htm#DHC Chipmunk.)
VH-BBK
http://www.cnapg.org/chipmunk.htm
These two were on the old thread but removed to save space…worth uploading again I think for this thread
Thanks old eagle – missed them already in the old thread 😉
Some details about G-AJCH (ex TW510 XE-B)
‘…So was born a pioneer air service, with two second-hand ex-military Auster aircraft bought in Britain for only £700 each. They were shipped to the Falklands in crates, assembled in a roofless hangar, and on 19 December, 1948, Vic Spencer, a pilot hired in the United Kingdom, made the historic test flight from Stanley racecourse, the only suitable stretch of land for a light aircraft to take-off and land.
…
The first Auster, with its pioneer registration identity G-AJCH, overturned at San Carlos when its wheels sank into soft mud. It had to be shipped back to Britain for repairs and conversion into a float-plane, a more practicable solution with the lack of suitable air-strips and the proximity of water and landing jetties to most farm settlements….’
Just found this old thread (2000 – 2006)
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=41688
… with photos! 🙂
Edit, does anyone know what type the galley shot is taken in, certainly dosen’t appear to be Shack, reminds me of Sunderland?!
here’s a Sunderland galley
http://www.airmuseum.ca/mag/exag0108.html
The Lifeboat is under a Shackleton MR.2, unusual shot though as I didn’t think St Eval had lifeboat equiped units, …
Airborne Lifeboat, Mk. 3
Hawker-Siddeley Shackleton MR.2
http://navigator.rafmuseum.org/results.do;jsessionid=81B0D28E39276374A6E5B5277FFD76D6?view=detail&db=object&id=176233
Tried this link: http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/
but too many means … :confused:
ADE Aeronautical Development Establishment
DDE Deputy District Engineer (USACE)
DMT Distributed Mission Training (US DoD)
PSCO Personnel Survey Control Officer
quote: ‘Are there any other pictures of the early Hurricanes used by Luftwaffe?’
Hurricane IA
http://www.zweiter-weltkrieg-lexikon.de/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=770
Nice pic from 1974
http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0745813/L/
quote: What is a C-109?
‘But first, a short background and description of the C-109.
The need for a tanker came about when the only route into China from India was across the Himalayas, known colloquially as, “The Hump.”
A proposal to bomb the Japanese homeland from India would require refuelling stops on Chinese airfields to enable the tanks of the B-24 Liberators and B-29 Superforts to be topped up on the long missions. With all land routes effectively blocked, the gasoline have to be flown in. Development of a truly effective tanker to fuel for the B-24s and B-29s of 20th Bomber Command would have taken too long, so the USAAF decided the next best thing would be to convert an existing high-altitude bomber. A B-17F (serial # 42-30190) and a B-24E (serial # 42-7221) were duly modified for comparison. Both aircraft were redesignated, the B-17 becoming XC-108, and the B-24 the XC-109. The XC-109 showed a better range and payload, as well as a more capacious fuselage would be well suited to the installation of extra gas tanks.
Cargo fuel was carried in eight tanks within the airplane. Four each with a capacity of 400 U.S gallons, were fitted in the bomb and three tanks with a total capacity of 334 gallons were located on the deck above and behind the bomb bays. A further 102 gallons was situated in the nose position. In addition was the C-109’s gas in the wing tanks, of 2814 gallons, of which some 864 could be drained off as cargo on “Hump” flights, leaving enough for the tanker to return to India. This gave a total fuel cargo of 2900 U.S. gallons, the equivalent of one and a half of the largest semi-trailer tank trucks then in use by the U.S. Army. It was estimated that two C-109 deliveries would supply the fuel to “top-off’ just one B-29 in China for a raid on Japan. All armament was deleted from the C-109 and the turret and waist gun positions were faired over with light alloy.
Other than a few rare exceptions, all B-24 to C-109 conversions were J, L, and M models, and all but nine were built in the Ford Motor Company’s Willow Run plant.’
http://www.ninth-airforce.co.uk/c109story.htm