Here’s G-AOGE after the incident.


I wonder who the chap with the ‘tash is?
On the master plate, there a “VH” just behind the black nose tip. You can just about see the black spot and some white letters on the image above. I think therefore Moggy could be right on APVH. Our guess is a production test flight at Bitteswell.
As some of you may know, my employer is Flight International who have a massive photo archive dating back donkeys. There is a naturally a lot of historical content that has been largely untapped and could be of interest to many here. Things might be changing though and made available for nothing. Though I guess the the high-res stuff will be chargeable. π
The trouble is the negs, slides and plates don’t always come with a good explanation on the photo subject, plus where and when.
I got some more cool plate scans if you want a look? There’s some King’s Cup air race stuff and interesting post-WW2 US bomber to bomber refuelling shot.
What is significant about G-APVH?
Bet you can’t ID it π
Hi all, you may recall me posting a request for letters following the application for two adjoining warehouses. This application has been withdrawn. However a second application has been submitted and your help is again requested… Here’s the letter from the owner of my club:
“Dear Member
You may recall me writing to you regarding the proposed planning application submitted by Astral Developments for a warehouse-like construction on the airfield close to runway 05/23. My thanks to all of you who wrote in and objected to this, I know there were quite a few. Astral have now dropped this application.
However a new one has been submitted, essentially the same plans as before but with a reduction in the height of the building from 15 metres to 12.
They have also radically redesigned the roof. The new plans are designed to allay any fears that we may have regarding the safe operations of runway 05/23, however, they make little or no difference to our original objections. Indeed, it is quite possible that the new roof design will make matters worse with regard to wind vortices and turbulence.
Plans can be viewed in the airfield managerβs office.
It is obvious that Astral Developments are not going to let this drop. Our original concerns still stand, this will affect safe operations at Wellesbourne and may ultimately close the runway.
Therefore, we need to write again. The original letters will no longer count against this new proposal and it is vital that we voice our concerns once more. Letters should be sent by 25 October 2005 to:
Les Greenwood
Stratford Upon Avon District Council
Elizabeth House
Church Street
Stratford upon Avon
CV37 6HX
Or email to [email]les.greenwood@stratford-dc.gov.uk[/email]
Quote reference 05/02845/FUL Land in North East Sector of Wellesbourne Mountford Aerodrome
As pilots, I know you will realise the importance of resisting these developments and I urge you to express your concerns once again, in the strongest terms.
Peter Newbold”
Doesn’t it say somewhere about getting NOTAM/AIS info from an approved source?
Yes, ‘Pro before the AIS site redesign though. More or less achieve the same objectives though ‘Plot is cheaper.
Oi’ve been on ‘oliday so will respond from work tomorrow
The gap between mogas and avgas gets ever wider (yet there’s about 50% less duty on the latter!) :rolleyes:
It’s got to be one of the sportiest single seaters available today.
We just saw MH434 heading south 8)
Never happened I think. The series still has Ricky Tomlinson and Denise Welch in.
If the turboprop had been invented, could a B-17 have flown laden with that one engine? I’m ignoring an argument here that states more power per engine would redefine an airframe design.
Actually I saw this model on another site earlier today. Spooky
Have you been photoshopping again? The Cub in the foreground has a de-registered registration!
P.S. Mrs Moggy scrubs up well π
Hangars are what you put aeroplanes in, hangers are what you suspends your shirts from!