Agreed. The Boeing Japan and Boeing USA official sites
http://www.boeing.com/ids/armysystems/news/2005/q4/051220a_nr.html
http://www.boeing.jp/2005/051220.html
designate it as “AH-64DJP” Apache Longbow.
OTOH, the Fuji Heavy Industries (Subaru) official site doesn’t seem to mention it yet?
BTW, the AH-64A Flight Manual is available at
http://www.eflightmanuals.com/detail/itemList.asp?page=4&cID=29
for USD 49.95.
http://response.jp/issue/2006/0126/article78699_1.html
http://response.jp/issue/2006/0126/article78699_1.images/106574.html
26 January 2006:
In Japan, at Fuji Heavy Industries Utsunomiya, Tochigi Prefecture, JGSDF AH-64DJP 74501 first flight.
After hovering, flew about for 15 minutes.
Deliver two this year. Eight by 2008.
http://www.asahi.com/english/Herald-asahi/TKY200601250168.html
“Yamaha lied about GPS on helicopter”
01/25/2006
The Asahi Shimbun
Yamaha Motor Co. deliberately understated the technological functions of an unmanned helicopter it planned to sell to a Chinese company when it applied for an export permit, according to sources.
Its on display all over Viet Nam, in museums and in parks, preserved to remind everyone of Viet Nam’s victory.
http://www.txsj.com/bbs/cgi-bin/topic.cgi?forum=5&topic=10012&show=50
Photos of preserved aircraft and wrecks at a Viet Nam AF museum. 8b
http://www.fubusi.com/2005/11-30/101110700.html
J-6. PLAAF. 1979.04.15. Guang Xi Province, PRC.
About 12:48, at a front-line AB in Guang Xi Province, PLAAF pilot YAN Wen Chang stole a J-6 and attempted to defect to Viet Nam. 8(
Crashed into mountains, because of bingo fuel in cloudy/foggy weather.
(Sigh. I changed my mind and did my homework myself.)
According to Rick’s PLAAF serial numbers matrix at
http://www.china-military.org/blog/blog.htm
“10660” probably belongs to the 13th, 14th, or 15th
Regiment, 5th Division (1XX6X = 16 > 16 – 11 = 5), PLAAF,
based at Wei Fang AB, Shan Dong Province, Ji Nan Military
Region, northeastern PRC.
http://www.china-military.org/units/jinan/5div/5div.htm
The 5th Division drives the Q-5. 8)
If any of you “EXPERTS” had bothered to check the facts… 😡 😡
you would have found out the the ABL is NOT an air-to-surface weapon or and Anti-ICBM system.
‘ATL can produce both lethal and non-lethal effects, supporting missions on the battlefield and in urban operations. It can destroy, damage or disable targets with little to no collateral damage. As a directed energy weapon, the Advanced Tactical Laser is complementary to the Airborne Laser (ABL), which Boeing is developing for the U.S. Missile Defense Agency to destroy ballistic missiles in their boost phase of flight. ABL consists of a megawatt-class chemical laser mounted on a Boeing 747-400 freighter aircraft.
“ATL will do for air-to-ground combat what ABL will do for missile defense: revolutionize the battlefield,” said Pat Shanahan, Boeing Missile Defense Systems vice president and general manager. “ATL will give the warfighter a speed-of-light, precision engagement capability and avoid the kind of collateral damage sometimes associated with such traditional weapons as bombs and missiles.”‘
Source:
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q1/060123a_nr.html
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q1/060123a_nr.html
Air-to-surface laser.
No agoniser, cloaking device, deflector shield, disruptor, impulse engine, photon torpedo, or warp engine reported yet.
(Yes, I favour the Klingons. How did you know?)
Battlefield 2: Armored Fury [Windows]
My dumb questions of the week, WRT Chinese Q-5:
Is “10660” a real PLA/PLAAF/PLAN serial number?
If yes, it belongs to which unit in which military district?
Does the unit operate the Q-5?
(No, I’m not clever enough to decipher Rick’s serial numbers matrix.) 8b
Solved Mystery
What are those bombs in the second photo under the wings? They look like some type of CBU unit. China doesn’t use the BL.755 do they?
In upper left part of photo, the label under the rear wheel of the truck reads “(Type) 250-3 aerial anti-tank cluster bomb (copy Brit BL755)”.
The label southeast of the above label reads “Anti-runway bomb (copy Durandal)”.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2006-01/24/content_4093392.htm
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/art/2006/01/24/237690/Beijing_denies_aircraft_carrier_rumor.htm“Beijing denies aircraft-carrier rumor”
Grumble. Should’ve posted that in the Navy Forum.
If I follow the “If it’s on Xin Hua, it must be true” JMT (Jedi Mind Trick), then IMO the object in the Taiwanese photos is the world’s biggest piece of cardboard decoy, if I ever see one.
Evidence that the Chinese think bigger than, say, the Iraqis and Yugoslavs. 8)
http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2006-01/24/content_4093392.htm
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/art/2006/01/24/237690/Beijing_denies_aircraft_carrier_rumor.htm
“Beijing denies aircraft-carrier rumor”
2006-01-24 Beijing Time
Zhang Liuhao
THE central government today denied a rumor emanating from Taiwan about plans to buy and rebuild an aircraft carrier, Xinhua news agency reported.
] OH-6D. JGSDF. 2004.05.15.
Some actual photos at
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=833316&postcount=167
AH-1S. JGSDF. 2005.09.18.
Ainoura JGSDF Base, Sasebo City, Nagasaki Prefecture.
Two crew shaken.
“Dalian is an important city in the north of China with *the natural harbors*, well-established industry, and it is also active in trade and tourism. Dalian enjoys the provincial level of economic decision-making authority.”
http://2003.dl.gov.cn/i18n/en/img/bigmap.jpg
(http://2003.dl.gov.cn/i18n/en/index.htm)
Da Lian. Tour map. 8D