J-13 Raptor-wannabe
Don’t know if anyone here already seen these before.
For the photo analysts here,
http://military.china.com/zh_cn/important/64/20050509/12298339.html
is the first of six pages of photos of PLAAF aircraft cockpits. These first two photos are reportedly (top) the JH-7 (FBC-1) Fei Bao rear cockpit, and (bottom) the J-10 cockpit.
http://military.china.com/zh_cn/bbs/11018441/20050505/12289516.html
has a photo, reportedly taken at the Shen Yang Aircraft booth at a recent aerospace exhibition, that shows a few models of PLAAF actual and conceptual jet fighters, including the J-5, J-7, and J-13 Raptor-wannabe.
OTOH,
http://jczs.sina.com.cn/2005-05-10/1602287541.html
has a photo of an all-terrain golf cart, equipped with a 12.7 mm sniper rifle. Made in China.
[Accident Report] PLAAF accident on 8 April 2005 in China
In the authoritative Chinese (China) news site Xin Hua Net, an article dated 2005.05.08 at
http://jczs.sina.com.cn/2005-05-08/1308286709.html
http://mil.jschina.com.cn/Get/JSYX/05081620636.htm
http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2005-05/08/content_2929472.htm
reported:
On 8 April 2005, a PLAAF jet fighter had a landing accident in China.
It belonged to a division in the Shen Yang Military District.
At 18:23, it took off for a night training sortie.
At 18:59, it RTB and was landing on the runway, 300 m from where it deployed its drag chute, when it yawed to its right and its right wing slanted down. Its right landing gear had broken, and it could’ve slid off the runway and broken its wing.
Its pilot, Pilot First Class JIN Xiao Jun, applied left rudder, brakes, and shut down both engines. Reportedly worried about four other pilots landing behind him, he kept his fighter from gliding off the runway, and left enough length for the others to land.
His fighter mangaged to glide forward 150 m more, and stopped about 400 m from the end of the runway.
Days before 8 May 2005, he was awarded a third-class merit for this act. He had about 2,400 safe flight hours, and was previously awarded one second-class merit, and three third-class merits.
http://mil.jschina.com.cn/Get/air/0508164691.htm
has screen captures from a TV report of the accident, apparently with a dramatisation of the accident, and interviews with the pilots.
Incidentally,
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread10275/pg1
has IMO interesting comments about the Ka-58, the Mi-24, and the advantage of a combat chopper without a tail rotor.
I just saw the model kit of the “Ka-58 Black Ghost” at a hobby shop today.
For those who haven’t seen it,
http://www.aviapress.com/engl/zvd/zvd7232.jpg
http://www.fair-strike.com/eng/Ka58.html
have its pic.
For comparison and fun:
http://aviator.chat.ru/Prozvischa.html
“Russian Aviation Page: Aircraft nicknames used by
Soviet/Russian aircrews, ground personnel, and design
bureaus”, by A. Gretchikhine.
> How the hell did you think non-supersonic Harriers ended up with a 32-0 record against better performing machines?
Because the brave Argies were far, far from home base, needed in-flight refuelling to reach the Falklands, especially after the withdrawal of the 25 de Mayo, and they were mostly tasked with attacking the British warships instead of the British fighters?
In the Chinese (China) news site Sina News, an article about the PLA S-70C at
http://jczs.sina.com.cn/2005-04-13/1031280741.html
mentioned the S-70A-27 operated by the Hong Kong GFS (Government Flying Service) entered service on 2 March 1993, and retired in 2003. I didn’t know they were retired. 8(
The Hong Kong Yearbook 2002 at
http://www.info.gov.hk/yearbook/2002/ehtml/e16-12.htm
reported:
“The GFS operates a mixed aircraft fleet of two Jetstream J-41 aeroplanes and nine helicopters including six Sikorsky S-76 and three S-70 (Black Hawk) helicopters. In 2002, the GFS helicopter fleet underwent a phased replacement programme with the eventual introduction of eight new helicopters 。X three Eurocopter AS332 L2s (Super Pumas) and five Eurocopter EC155 B1s (Dauphines) 。X to further enhance the service capabilities of the department. During the year, the GFS flew a total of 6 578 hours in support of its clients and training for the complex roles undertaken. The organisation is staffed by 181 disciplined and 61 general grades personnel. The GFS is based at the Hong Kong International Airport where it carries out all of its maintenance work.”
http://jiatelin.jschina.com.cn/pla/s70.htm
has an article in Chinese (China), with photos, that reviews the S-70C Black Hawk that the PLA operated in the Xin Jiang and Xi Zhuang regions in western China.
Because spare parts are unavailable, they are replaced by the Mi-17 Hip H.
For visual comparison, a Chinese (China) article titled “‘Lavi’ – ‘Stolen’ Fighter” at
http://news.sohu.com/20050422/b225287796.shtml
has photos of the Lavi, and a Chinese (China) article about the abortion of the J-9 programme, and the development of the J-10 programme, at
http://jiatelin.jschina.com.cn/pla/j10.htm
in the paragraph with the word LAVI in blue, claims:
After the Soviet threat spread out in the 1970s, and China opened up in the 1980s, the Western nations gave military technological assistance to China, to counter the Soviet threat. Based on the IAI Lavi, Cheng Du developed the J-10.
Suggest you use Babelfish or similar sites to translate the articles.
] And in fact before I typed that other post I was comparing various pictures of the Lavi and J-10. I can’t think of two other planes that look as similar as those two that aren’t related to one another in terms of the designers of one plane helping with the design of the newer one.
For comparison, the European Jaguar attacker and the Japanese T-2 trainer also look like twins separated at birth, but AFAIK, the designers of one plane didn’t help with the design of the other plane. The Japanese designers claimed they developed the F-1 fighter-attacker from the T-2 by removing the rear cockpit and adding extra equipment in that space.
] The PLAAF already has the Python 3. It’s produced as the PL-8 in China, and has already been seen on the J-10. And the J-8II.
IIRC, when Wang Wei’s PLAN J-8II and the USN EP-3E collided on 1 April 2001, his and his wingman’s J-8II were carrying the Israel-inspired AAMs, but the USA didn’t complain about it.
] Israel has been penalized by the US after her past behavior and deals with China according to the current US administration.
In recent months, the USA forced Israel to not upgrade some PLA UAVs, and also limited Israeli participation in the F-35 programme.
If the Pakistani AF ever flies the J-10, though I think Russia disallows the export of the RD-33 engine on the J-10, then because the J-10 is based on the Lavi originally developed by Israel, this would be as ironic as the Iranian AF flying the F-4, F-5, and F-14, IMO. Or the several Eastern European NATO members flying all those MiGs, Mils, and Sukhois.
] As for me, it seems like, it has more to do with the western minds inability to cope with the fact that China who earlier have been building mainly copied and cheaper versions of the Russian a/c cud come up with a real good platform, which has a good potential to tilt the balance in China’s favour.
The other concurrent, mostly domestically developed new-generation jet fighters aren’t as impressive though: the FC-1 Xiao Long (JF-17 Thunder), and JH-7 Fei Bao (FBC-1 Flying Leopard).
] Learn a bit of history please from 1960 to 1980. The Soviet Union and China was actually fighting over some piece of land in the borders.
Agreed. ISTR some months ago, Russia returned the border island on a lake or river to China.
Thank you. I’ve corrected/updated the links in the original message.
Instead of creating seperate threads, cant all the accident reports be put in one thread ?
WRT the recent accidents, I post them as I they pop up in Chinese news sites and as I read them.
WRT to the less recent accidents, I post them by aircraft types. If the Netters in these message boards haven’t read them before, then I hope I’m improving the news-to-noise ratio here. 8)
If the Netters here have read them before, then I hope the Netters will contribute and fill in the details about those accidents that I don’t know. FYI, until 1998, I was an active regular in the rec.aviation.* Usenet newsgroups.
] Good on him, though, for getting the jet back on the
] ground in one piece, his award was well-deserved.
Although “it’s better to be lucky than to be good”, naturally PLAAF pilots aren’t always so fortunate. See my other “[Accident Report] PLAAF JH-7 accidents in China” thread for unfortunate samples.
Thanks for your clarification. 8)