dark light

Twilight2005

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mig-31 versus F-22 #2606139
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    # # # # # # # # #

    I think most people on this thread, possibly with the exception of Garry, have basically forgotten that the FA-22 was downselected for its ability to operate in almost all air-air environments – not just ones which comprise saturation air-defence by Russian-made Mig-31’s, Su-35’s and S-300’s. How many wars has the USAF fought directly against the Russian Air Force anyway? None. So perhaps, taking the fight all the way to Moscow wasn’t really behind the idea of the project – but as it seems obvious, just the nicest bit of kit going for MOST hostile scenarios that might necessitate FA-22 inclusion.

    Anyway, the ’22 isn’t without its drawbacks, the same as any aircraft, and these are expense, and the lack of real A2G capability (for the short term at least).

    As for stealth, its not all its cracked up to be, the same as pretty much every other technology, since every action results in a reaction by opposing and competiting industries. An aircraft might be able to return only around 0.0001% of its own “silhouette-RCS” back to the target as true RCS, but this does not eliminate the ability of sensitive radars to detect radiation being deflected off surrounding air molecules or water-vapour (slipstream, air-turbulence, water-vapour displacement etc. may be exploited in the future).
    Since the electromagnetic spectrum is very wide, and that doesn’t even include infrasound, one wonders just how much background and actively deployable radiation is out there that will simply negate “modern” stealth capabilities, forcing the creation of ever wider-band low observability. Sorry, but no Klnigon Bird’s of Prey just yet.

    in reply to: Saudis pledge to buy French jets in €6bn deal #2614457
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    Since two posters have already initiated off-topic discussion against Cyprus, I reserve a degree of lee-way to say that the UN referendum was considered totally unfair and biased in favour of Turkey. If a foreign country had occupied you for 31 years, wouldn’t you want a solution that even came close to gauranteeing some of your interests, including removal of ALL occupation forces. I am disgusted that people can so easily ignore the occupation of a European country, and say “there is no problem there”. Why should Greek-Cypriots face punitory treatment for objecting to an invasion and occupation THEY NEVER ASKED FOR.

    I could post pictures of the napalmed Nicosia Melkonian District Hospital, the product of unrestricted close-air support in 1974, but then you don’t care, and it would be a fruitless venture.

    I believe I have exhausted my lee-way. So back on-topic.

    I cannot see a future for China in the European arms market within the next 25 years. Shock. Horror. But tht ground work for such a plan has been in place for decades, since China adopted communism, and the world’s best arms industries thrived in democracy. Perhaps a change in Chinese domestic policy make occur before then, I don’t see anyone west of the EU line selling anything even remotely weaponised to PR China with the Taiwan issue ever lingering.

    in reply to: Saudis pledge to buy French jets in €6bn deal #2614729
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    The Turkish military has illegally occupied the northern half of the Republic of Cyprus for 31 YEARS! and that hasn’t stopped most of Europe selling one form of armament or another to Turkey. Cyprus has no oil, hence its citizens and sovereignty were always going to fall well beneath Turkey on the list of international priorities, 3 UN resolutions and all. They’re even exporting tourism to northern Cyprus now. I think that adequately illuminates global standards on arms sales, don’t you think?

    in reply to: Cyprus Pocket Navy – Photos #2054816
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1112969511.JPG

    New pictures. These have come from a temporary source. Could someone help me upload them to a permament internet source so they don’t expire?

    Thanks

    in reply to: Hellenic Navy (News & Views). #2056260
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    ps. Cyprus is reported to have procured at least one new-build maritime operations and surveillance fixed wing aircraft. Does anyone have any newer information, as I have had no success finding out the type or payload. The info was reported in the Guardian newspaper last year, and the Government tender expired last September.

    I would really appreciate any help anyone has on this. I know there has been some interest in UAV’s, and the BN-2B Defender is already operated (x2) one with FLIR.

    in reply to: Hellenic Navy (News & Views). #2056263
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    Does the HN have any interest in a fixed wing capability – I know there are a number of semi-ancient P-3 Orions operating with a HAF group, don’t know what Air Wing.

    There is currently no new P-3 production line I think, there is a new USN and NATO export model in the late US down-select stage. Embraer produce the common EMB-145 airframe for a navalised Erieye variant of naval AWACS and / or SIGINT / ELINT / SAR with an ASW capability. The same system can also, as far as I am aware, be installed on the Saab Argus series, which Greece has experience operating. Perhaps the Alenia C-27 would also have the platform requirements to replace th P-3’s in the next decade or so?

    Comments?

    in reply to: Using people to guide SAMs #2048678
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    What you are talking about is:

    CLOS (Command Line of Sight) or
    SACLOS (System and Command Line of Sight)

    These methods of man-in-the-loop operation are used in almost all anti-tank guided weapons, either with a wire, laser or beam-radiation in most cases to provide telemtry back and forth from weapon to operator. You can also find such methods in air-launch missiles, such as the AGM-64 Maverick, where the weapon is being fired at a static or rather slow-moving target (hence such systems can cope well with a 2D target environment, and possibly slow or hovering aircraft.

    SAM’s are used in a 3D target environment, against high-speed and manouvering targets where electronic warfare can be used to disrupt man-in-the-loop telemtry. Weather such as cloud make optical guidance of a SAM just as impossible as for a human, who would never be able to steer the weapon on to target at high closing speeds .etc.

    It makes more sense to let the ground base station (battery fire-controller) and missile do as much of the work as possible, so the operator only has to designate a traget and push a button. It is also an advantage to make the missile autonomous or fire-and-forget.

    in reply to: Why doesn't Iran operate Flankers? #2633100
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    In my neutral opinion, Iran would seek to maximise the advantage of sheer theatre size in any war, dispersing critical mobile targets as far apart and well concealed as possible, making use of varied terrain (the Iraqis were stuck with a lot of flat desert) to hide their mobile balllistic kit .etc. and perhaps attempt extensive naval mining to keep opposition naval ops (SSN’s primarily) at bay for longer. The Iraqis successfully used, in 1991, a tactic of deploying mine layers in constricted waters of the Persian Gulf, forcing coalition vessels into the radar and potential MEZ’s of coastal C-802 Silkworm sites. Although there were no missile kills on shipping, one USMC vessel was hit by a sea mine.

    Unlike Iraq, Iran is not under a dictatorship so much as a strong polarised theocracy, and we know from the Iran-Iraq war that morale will be less important, so much as intense determination and strong fanaticsm or extreme belief. This may manifest itself in the behaviour of fighter pilots / AD operators / naval operators in-theatre as a much more aggressive or persistent stance to press counter-attack. The same could be true at infantry level, or irregular infantry level.

    in reply to: General Discussion #368998
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    There is a whole global industry for defeating speed traps (laser / em bands / optical flash), with some amazingly sophisicated models available on the open market for just $200-300. I’ve seen wide-band laser-diffusers, directional RWR, LWR, audio-visual heads-up warning, GPS positioning with wireless website update, backflash optical-trigger flashing (in the x million candela range) and ambient 360-degree band scanners!

    Some of this stuff is so cheap you wonder how outfitting attack helicopters could be so expensive?

    in reply to: General Discussion #369524
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    Still want to try this out, new tourist sub at Larnaka.

    http://www.sadkosub.com/images/photogallery/pics/n_sad1.jpg

    in reply to: General Discussion #369525
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    Tis pretty good biking / 4×4 in Cyprus, Weather is great April – October, Paphos straight through to Nicosia is one giant freeway. A lot of funky offroading and the annual Cyprus Rally is quite funny. Once got an L200 jammed between two olive trees near Curium, had to tow it out with a tractor….

    in reply to: Cyprus Pocket Navy – Photos #2059717
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    http://www.kaminco.com/images/history/PV24%202.cy.jpg

    Found this picture of a “Cyprus Navy” patrol craft on the webiste of Greek naval contractors Kaminco.

    Can’t ID it, possibly an Israeli Shaldag / Kingfisher or a Italian Pattugliatore. Anyone want to try an ID on that, or see if it is indeed Cypriot?

    in reply to: Cyprus Pocket Navy – Photos #2060088
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    Those antique Ventian (?) fortifications should really be a National Heritage site by now, certainly not an AA position. I do not know if Kyrenia castle was damaged in 1974.

    in reply to: Cyprus Pocket Navy – Photos #2060107
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    Further to Ristans very helpful post, here is the picutre, showing the naval station at Kyrenia, with two P-6 tropedo craft seen at the far left of the photo (note SKINHEAD radar domes), communications antennae and military vehicle in the background.

    http://kypros.org/Occupied_Cyprus/Famagusta/Images/Kyrenia4.JPG

    Photo is copyrighted.

    in reply to: Cyprus Pocket Navy – Photos #2060110
    Twilight2005
    Participant

    Thank you both for your help.

    Fantasma, I agree, the picture looks somewhat odd, though I have no way to prove or disprove it in context. The source was a BBC archive page, which would be a somewhat bizzare setting for a mislabelled (or otherwise) image. As far as I can tell, AP denotes Associated Press, but I could be wrong.

    From what I have been able to gather at acig, the Phaethon packed either or both 40mm / 20mm, though no photos seem to exist on the internet, nor on any publication I known of to confirm that. I cannot verify the exact circumstances of the downed F-100 (s), but I will certainly work on it.

    Thanks.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 22 total)