I wasn’t aware its rebuild was finished? I went to the Kemble Open Day in September and enquired about WV318’s status and was told it was expected to fly again ‘sometime next year’.
Saw Andrew last Saturday at the Heathrow Aviation Enthusiasts’ Fair. Couldn’t catch him to get an update, so glad to see things are starting to happen. Well done all…Alvis would be proud of you!;)
I have always surmised that the cockpit noise level in a S Otter must have been ‘impressive’,at least in a Walrus the prop noise was a little more remote!
..you mean like a VC-10?:rolleyes:
Hi Albert,
Check your e-mail.It’s definitely a real, Walrus Mk.II. Walrus for various reasons, but mainly the lack of a raised cockpit top and lack of ’rounding’ to the cockpit corners which is how a Sea Otter looks. Mk.II because the hull is breaking up as the wooden hull (essentially the Saro built Mk.II) would do, and not metal with obvious rivets as the Mk.I would be. Note also the patches on the rear hull port side. Real because of all the correct detail fittings inside the bow, the cockpit canopy etc, which wouldn’t be right (or even there) on a mock up.
HTH
That’s the good news and suppose the bad news is that it got scrapped?:(
Can you confirm the identify please James?
A google search of ‘Sea Otter + “The Sea shall not have them”‘ is worth a look.
I suspect they may have used a combination of period footage and the big tank at Pinewood with the Hanwell airframe.
Mark
Thanks Peter, so are you saying this is a mock-up?
Hi Phil,
Why do they have to be ‘on line’ photo collections and how old is ‘old’? I’m sure several forumites may be able to help if you give more information regarding usage? I certainly have a huge archive on RAF Lyneham.
We have debated this issue MANY times on this forum and a lot of rubbish has resulted. However, this time round it it refreshing to read some genuine useful and interesting facts from Don and JDK in particular. As one who has published much over the years, I also have had experience of various copyright issues. However, publishing a copyright photograph without permission is one thing, but ‘proving’ ownership is quite something else. You can be stood side-by-side with someone shooting an aircraft and take identical shots. Could you prove which one is yours? Secondly in this wonderful digital age of technology, whereas an original ‘Crown Copyright’ photograph would be stamped on the reverse, these can be scanned, cropped and reprinted, so in effect it is not the same photograph. For anyone disputing that, run that photo through Photoshop and add a ‘spot’ and you have created a new image. Thought I would just play ‘devil’s advocate’ to see where we stand with that?
It wasn’t until today that I knew that A HP Hermes G-AGUB had a tail wheel, this registration became VX234 with the Ministry of Supply and was used to test ‘sideways looking RADAR’ for the TSR2 project. The ‘Hermes’ looked very much like a Hastings but with a different window configuration. Can anyone enlarge on this please
Just scanning some prints and came across this one, which I thought I would add to this old thread. It shows RRE Hermes IV (was it ever known as a C.1?) at Pershore on 25 Oct 67.
Joined up manager thinking as ever. You must have been peeved Albert?
‘Peeved’ is not a word I would have chosen! There are times when banging your head against a brick wall doesn’t help. I hasten to say that shortly afterwards, the Aviation Archive marketing manager was made redundant!
I know about this, as I work for Corgi. This model was accurately researched as a 112 Squadron machine with sharkmouth and green fins by me. For some unknown reason the ‘then’ Marketing Manager changed it to a 6 squadron machine in an unusual grey colour. As I no longer had any input into this model, reversing this decision was impossible and no reason was given for the change, so I’m not surprised the box says ‘112 Squadron’ as that is what it should have been! 🙁
I have been following this story on another aviation forum.
They were actively campaigning against this plan, as it meant the complete destruction of the airfield.:mad:
Is that really relevant for Wroughton, as it is seldom used by any aircraft these days. The Science Museum killed off any aviation events such as the ‘Great Warbirds’ air show and the PFA Rally by asking too much money for the use of the airfield. The few times the airfield is ever used, they have to bring in special fire cover etc. Is is really worth keeping it open as an ‘airfield’?
Fantastic stuff Tim! You really took advantage of this rare flight with some great shots and weren’t you lucky with the weather? I like the way the Dutch roundel is painted inside the float strut! You would have thought they would have painted it further inboard!!
Here are some of the photos I took of George Edwards, when I shared the last Viscount flight out of Heathrow on 18th April 1996.
That’s Raymond Baxter stood up and George is immediately beside him, alongside famous personalities associated with the Viscount, including the prototype’s test pilot, Jock Bryce.
The photo in front of the Viscount shows Sir Peter Masefield, George Edwards and Lord King, then Chairman of BA. Sadly all three are no longer with us. I have also included a brochure given to us on the day, on which I obtained the signatures of George Edwards and Lord King.
I was very proud of being invited to that historical event and to share the company of such aviation legends.
Rob,
I was very lucky to have met him and furthermore shared a flight in the last Viscount out of Heathrow in ’96. If you want a couple of photos of this occasion, just ask?
This is not just about aviation, this is the History of Science & Technology in transport and the Wroughton collection comprises so much more than just aircraft – vintage cars, buses, tractors, the SRN-1 Hovercraft prototype etc. This would have been showcase for future generations to see all these including the aircraft…..now they just have to remain housed in a series of WW2 hangars!! What an opportunity missed!:mad: