A nice image to see, though I’m guessing that is Thunder City’s own paint scheme? Does South Africa have a more relaxed version of the CAA, or could we ever see a Buccaneer in the UK skies again?
Relaxed? Was horizontal compared to the UK CAA until Dave Stock’s death. They still are more relaxed afterwards, although I am sure Thunder City never got an Air Operators Certificate back. One would never get that in the UK for a fast jet, although I do believe I have heard rumours that less complex vintage aircraft operators are being allowed AOC privileges on a case by case basis in the UK now.
Well one of them is flying and is legal to fly.. If it wasn’t it would not be.. 🙂
Thanks for that. The CAA point is quite clear. There was no issue with acceptance of the engine as an airworthy unit.
Amazing response to a report that stated the CAA could not confirm the maintenance provider had a legal AMOC to the MPD with them or not. Government department bun fight. The maintenance issues raised do strike a cord mind. Differing manual amendment states for the same marks of aircraft with the same modification states has seen as an issue by the AAIB, not surprised by that.
The point is simple.
If the aircraft was carrying parts that were technically not airworthy, it should not have been flying. If it hadn’t been flying, the accident wouldn’t have happened. That is why this report has been released. However, there is clearly some obfuscation here. The parts concerned do not, by my reading of the report have anything to do with the accident. If the aircraft had been fitted with cartridges in calendar life, it would have changed nothing.
No it would not have. However the AAIB have looked at all facets of the maintenance of the airframe with a fine tooth comb as one expects in a air accident (as is their remit). There are things they are concerned about that drove them to raise a special report. The engine inspections overdue or not recorded is more a concern to me than the cartridges. If that had happen to an airline that a range of checks had not been carried out, the frames would have been checked very quickly (and I have seen it happen). If the maintence required to be carried out it is not carried out in the time scales required and no extension / variation applied/granted.. Effective Continued airworthiness management seems to have failed as far as the operator/owner organisation was concerned. AAIB concern..
Reading through this I can’t help but feel that operation of vintage jets will become impossible in the UK. I think we all knew that this accident would be a game changer for operations of vintage aircraft and airshows and this report and I suspect the final one will put an end to vintage jet operations in the UK. I do worry that this report asks more questions than it answers too.
The CAA will be a lot tighter on what gets a PtF at the end. Cartridges out of date on the seat smacks of Thunder City and the approved maintenance schedule confusion makes it look as if the aircraft was not air worthy..
For our very own Paul (Ozjag) 🙂
Paul has made enquires for me and one will see if XX 741 may or may not get help from one of its old OEMs. We have asked a few questions to the right people and wait for any answer.
Seen this?
Might have. 😉
Especially for John
All the flying control surfaces moving on the wing and tail plane / fin.
What a fight to get that lot sorted, still have a bit to do on the systems in regards of locking stuff before we can call it a wrap as far as the Chap 19 stuff is concerned..
It took seven trips totaling about 30 days to separate the wing, and a another two for the fuselage and wing, about 36 days in total.
Would be interested to hear the ball park figure it cost the UAM to dismantle and move the frame.. I know how much it cost the LPG to move the Lightning, a sum that exceeded 5 figures and they had contacts that allowed that figure to be a lot less than it would have been. If the MoD will not move it, that’s the costs on top of the bidding one.
How can the wind remove the blanks?
Very easily. The push in blanks on the turboprop I work on for my day job have a very nasty habit of falling out in strong winds, especially if they are worn.
Hi Al, yes I got one from a friend in the UK. I have the GR3 mount as a spare if anyone ever needs one. It’s always the way that you buy something at great expense then find 10 really cheap ones soon after.
Paul
Got something for the left hand or some elastic on the way??
Hi Al, just made a small contribution, I couldn’t do more as I’m about to pay for shipping for something quite exciting for my Jag, will send you pics when it arrives.
Paul
Thanks Paul. I have been trawling through old forum posts recently as you can tell. Did you sort the mount for your pistol grip in the end mate? We brought one off a dealer at great expense.. Before being given one.. 🙁
Update.
With donations and a pledge from the 6 Squadron Association, the fundraising campaign is less that 300 pounds from reaching the target required to purchasing the set of jacks. We hope people on this forum would consider even a tiny donation to our efforts. Many thanks.
IFR Probe hydraulics in action
The XX741 guys got the probe working with hydraulic power for the first time on Sunday. The lights in the probe do work, but they have power supply issues that need troubleshooting. The door is not connected to the actuator, but you can hear it motoring and the limit switches work.