dark light

vildebeest

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 86 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Airfix 1/24 Mosquito #225891
    vildebeest
    Participant

    And of course, Shaun the Sheep

    Paul

    in reply to: RAF Binbrook History Wanted #1289299
    vildebeest
    Participant

    My Dad did his national service as an engine fitter on 617 Canberras in the period 52-54 (not sure of exact dates, but 617 had not long ago given up Lincolns when he started). He had a photo of what I think (it was some time since I last saw it) was a rather battered engine from a Canberra on a piece of runway which he said was from a Canberra that crashed on take off, but I am not sure which one. From what you say, it could I guess be WF891

    Paul

    in reply to: General Discussion #302124
    vildebeest
    Participant

    I was watching first and second attempts from the Priory with the wife and kids, bit cold and wet so decided to go home after second attempt, turned round when we saw her having a third attempt, decided definitely going home now, saw her coming in for the fourth attempt, dropped the wife and kids off and missed it all while trying to park again.

    So it’s nice to see what actually happened! Best photos I’ve seen so far

    Paul

    in reply to: QE2 arrives on the Tyne ………just! #1925696
    vildebeest
    Participant

    I was watching first and second attempts from the Priory with the wife and kids, bit cold and wet so decided to go home after second attempt, turned round when we saw her having a third attempt, decided definitely going home now, saw her coming in for the fourth attempt, dropped the wife and kids off and missed it all while trying to park again.

    So it’s nice to see what actually happened! Best photos I’ve seen so far

    Paul

    in reply to: North East Aircraft Museum…..updates #1269112
    vildebeest
    Participant

    Jeeps and Jets 2007

    I was there on Saturday with wife and two sons. Everybody had an excellent time – including of course looking in the Vulcan cockpit!

    Well done and many thanks to all involved in arranging it – including the ATC cadets who impressed everyone with their efficiency and politeness in guiding everybody from the carpark – a credit to thier unit.

    Paul

    in reply to: PA474, BBMF Lancaster update at day 80 #1324009
    vildebeest
    Participant

    There’s a report on the maintenance on BBC News 24 at the moment. Apparently, it is the “last surviving bomber”, which may worry some people

    Paul

    in reply to: WW1 aircraft survivors? #1332998
    vildebeest
    Participant

    I think it is correct that the Alcock & Brown Vimy does not have a serial. It was never a RAF plane – the flight was a venture on behalf of Vickers – and it was before the introduction of civil registrations.

    paul

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1305501
    vildebeest
    Participant

    I may be wrong, but didn’t the Aeroclub mixed injection/vacform 1/48 B6 have the extended fuselage for the PR3?

    Paul

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1308263
    vildebeest
    Participant

    Totally agree about Matchbox – except that you missed out the Heyford!

    Paul

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1308319
    vildebeest
    Participant

    James

    No special pleading, I think, because they are British, maybe, however, as the other posts point out, special pleading because of the range of kits they make. It is true that I have not made many Japanese kits. The reason is solely because generally they do not make any models that interest me. My interest is in British aircraft, therefore I naturally have a bias towards Airfix, Matchbox and Frog because I tend to build models of subjects I want to build rather than because they are good kits. So, to show I am not a little-Englander, I am quite happy to praise New Zealand manufacturers when they produce Vildebeest!

    Probably on reflection they key to what I said was that I know Airfix kits. I know they make dogs (the Defiant is my favourite dog) but I know which they are. So I know not to give a child the Spitfire IX (which I agree is ridiculous to keep churning out) but stick with the I or V.

    Finally, I was talking about youngish children here. They know intuitively that all aircraft should have gaps between the wings and the fuselage, it is just these kit-manufacturers that keep getting it worng

    Paul

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1312540
    vildebeest
    Participant

    If you look on the modelling forum , you will see there is a link to the Hornby website, where Hornby actually seem more interested in Humbrol than in Airfix! Though Dave T sounds a note of caution.

    One of the good things I find about Airfix is that it is ideal if your kids are interested or you are trying to interest them. The new Revell and Japanese kits may be great if you want to build a detailed kit, a hundred fiddly bits is useless for 8 year old. The old Arifix kits however are ideal. And ,I know what to expect because I’ve built most of them in the past myself!

    Paul

    in reply to: Current Airfix state #228468
    vildebeest
    Participant

    Bought by Hornby according to the radio this morning. Good job, stock of Humbrol paints are running low, had great difficulty getting any 29 (dark earth) locally

    Paul

    in reply to: Airfix TSR.2 – got yours yet ? #228695
    vildebeest
    Participant

    whereas on e bay the other night I saw one up to about £35 with about 10 bids…

    Paul

    in reply to: Battle of Britain won by Royal Navy? #1330832
    vildebeest
    Participant

    There was an article in “another magazine” some years ago which argued very much the same point so the argument is not new. That article pointed out how what happened in the Far East and the Mediterranean was not relevant to 1940 since
    (1) as pointed out here, the Germans did not have in 1940 bombs which would penetrate battleship decks
    (2) in 1940, the Germans did not have any decent torpedo planes, the only ones being floatplanes. Someone will no doubt correct me if I am wrong, but weren’t PoW and Repulse sunk prinicpally by torpedoes rather than bombs?

    Paul

    in reply to: German Aircraft Carriers? #1276542
    vildebeest
    Participant

    Also report in today’s Times

    Paul

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 86 total)