Hey do u have any pictures of air launched F-18… I mean F-18 being lifted by chopper… from Carrier.. I remember reading about that thing in Combat Aircratfs Book
Dont remember Publication
a….
Pak-French defence cooperation to deepen: President Musharraf
(Updated at 2200 PST)
PARIS, FRANCE: President Gen. Pervez Musharraf Wednesday met here with with his French counterpart, Jacques Chirac, at the Elysee palace, which lasted for around 90 minutes.While talking with journalists after his meeting with Mr chirac, President Musharraf said his message that during in the meeting a number of global and regional issues came under discussion a consensus was developed on majority of the issues came under the discussion.
He told that the US-led campaign against terrorism must not be limited to military measures but include action to tackle the social and economic roots of extremism.
“Pakistan happens to be in the forefront of fighting terrorism. But we see the combat as having two dimensions. One dimension is being applied. This is the fighting and the military aggression to which we are contributing the maximum.
“However the second dimension does not seem to have started yet. And this second dimension is the real dimension — the strategic dimension — which is addressing the root causes,” he said.
When asked he believed Osama bin Ladin was still alive but his whereabouts was unknown.
Replying to question about purchasing of French F-16 fighter planes, the president said: “We would shore up defence cooperation with France in a number of matters.”
He informed Pakistan itself too was making a jet plane for which many of the equipments needed for their manufacturing were being imported from France.
“Kashmir issue was also discussed in our meeting and we have outright understanding over this issue like many others”, he stated.
France believed tension in Middle East would never be overcome until and unless Palestinian issue was resolved, President Musharraf informed.
President Musharraf also extended offer to Mr Chirac to visit Pakistan which former accepted.
And people are not ready to believe Fc1 will host any Westren avionics …..I think if Pak is able to get AMMRAMS probably then Pakistan can also ask America for help in tweaking FC-1 to carry AMRAAMs… wow Imagine FC-1 with RAM coating carrying AMRAAMS …DRAGON becomes stealthy and lethal….And also FC-1 will become truly global in sense…. can carry Chinese/Russian or American Hardware…a true open architecture based aircraft
Thanx Distiller ,Flex 297
Material posted by u guys cleared many of my doubts …Thanx a lot to all of U 🙂
Flex297 Thanks for the Information…:)
So u mean to say had the pressure produced in Jet Engines been equivalent to the pressure generated in Roceket engine( In pre throat area) Jet would to have same kind of nozzles as the Rocket Engines have?
Sorry for stupid ques but just want to satisfy my quest for the info..
Thanks
Sorry one more doubt… if we have a jet engine kind of nozzle in rocket engine…will the thrust be more?
Hey thanks AerospaceTech for those very nice images !! And thank you wolverine for the good info u have posted 🙂 Cheers for that !!!! Its a really Good thread….Keep it up !!!
and one More question was gunsight also used to to fire unguided rockets on to target
by MiG21 or any other help is available for that… or for dropping bombs….
Hmmmm In which language u intend to develop the site?
Do the current prototypes carry a RADAR with them?
If so when is the shedule set for radar integretion , …&. when will weapon integretion take place?
Cheers
The computer provides the targeting cues in Mig29s and all flankers. The gun is normally cued to the radar or IRST or both. In case the radar and IRST fail then you have no other option but to go for the SETKA mode. It is an independant mode and therefore does not involve computers. It is a last resort mode.
Sometimes your gun computation system will fail too Play any cheap flight simulator and select the guns mode in that. You will see a funnel shape sighting system and that is the basic gun mode.The computer automatically calculates the bullet direction and drop etc. and the funnel sights keep moving with the target the host aircraft’s movement. This is a system more commonly adopted by western aircraft. Anyways should the funnel computation system fail the SETKA can be a lifesaver. The mode maybe crude but with practise it can be quite accurate.
The basic principal between modern funnel sights and SETKA is the same i.e. you will target the enemy in the same way in either mode. You must just do some things manually in SETKA since no computer is available.
Thanks A lot Wolverine!
Yes I too agree with ur viewpoint that if cue system on HUD fails it really becomes cumbersome to engage(I say because I have Played a lot of Janes IAF simulations and I remember the difficulty I had to face when both elctrical systems failed on F-16..(That happened a lot while carrying out mission to Golan hieghts)).
Wolverine/Pit/Harry/Google/Vympel,Please can u tell me How lockOn is achieved in Pre- MiG29 aircrafts….esp for Radar guided missiles….
What I mean is in simulators we have MFDs or HuDs where generaly press the
engage button once target cue is seen on MFD(using various modes GMT,IRST etc…. ).But Pre Mig29 didnt have those things i mean MFD’s….
Sorry I am being too sentimental :p But I cant stop myself from asking questions
Any How A very very intersting thread…. Hope someone open a new thread .
on HUD’s, how LockOn’s are achieved ….I havent found any thread on these topics in any forum.Though much information can be recieved about modren aircrafts from simulators but still info on How Gunsight/Hud looks like in MiG21,MiG25,Mig27 ,SU 24 etc How lock on is achieved.
Yep thats the SETKA gun mode alright. The aim cross is made from the elavation and azimuth scales. The target’s wings must align within the two set of diagonal lines for the bullets to hit. The pilot must use the elevation scale to measure the target altitude and adjust for bullet drop manualy.
SETKA is the main gun aiming system in the Bis AFAIK. Other aircraft include the Mig29 and Su27 have it too but it is used as a last resort in those planes. If the radar and IRST fail then SETKA becomes the iron sights.
Wolverine
Sorry for asking agaain but could u enlighten me more about it…Does it mean in MiG29 or Su-30K(not MKI), the computer does not provide cue on Hud ,for aiming??And the thing u explined heere…makes targeting very cumbeersome ini MiG21 isnt it?
But in future it is to see wether pakistan gets some cruise missiles from China
and get it integraeted with PAF invenotry
Stealth? Sextuplet FBW? 2 yrs and JF-17 without a confirmed engine fit, glass cockpit, radar, avionics, EW will be better than F-16I?
Anybody want to add more to this, perhaps with a link to confirmed articles please?
Its not Sextuplet but quadriplex..and why not better than F-16I’s it is not but 2+ yrs is what is reqiured for achieving that stat …cant u see how fast pak/chinese tech is developing?
Also why not stealth I think cant China share Plasma Stealth technology in future which it must be developing for its J-12 aircraft 😉
Phrozen
What will be radar range I thik it should be atleeast 150-200km with capablity to track 8-10 targets and simultaneously engage 4 -6 targets.I think this is atlesat Pak should aim for.Sigh but cant they increase no of hardpoints?
The JF-17 will surely be a good aircraft imagine what good aircraft it would be with
BVR SD-10
Stealth
Quadriplex FBW
I think if it developed at this rate Pakistan wont need any US F-16’s in near future.
The rate at which Chinais developing technology in 2 yrs time Pak will have JF-17 equivalent to F-16I if not better.