dark light

7seas

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 57 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Improved FREMM #2071393
    7seas
    Participant

    Thales Naval Nederland BV

    The registred company in the Netherlands is:
    Thales Nederland B.V.
    that’s the legal unit.

    That’s the unit that pays tax and has his resposibility to the legal system in the Netherlands, unions and for trade licenses.

    Now, please back on subject:
    Improved FREMM.

    in reply to: Improved FREMM #2071549
    7seas
    Participant

    To Alepou:

    This is a merge between DCN & Thales Naval France plus some other french activities.

    Thales Nederland (former Signaal) is not involved in this merger.
    Thales Nederland is independant of shipyards and works with shipyards whole world around.

    in reply to: Improved FREMM #2071562
    7seas
    Participant

    HJP, thanks for your reaction:

    Main weapon system of this ship will be the ASTER PAAMS (Principal Anti-Air Missile System) with a combination of ASTER 15 (range 30km) and ASTER 30 (range 100+km), the later of which is capable of supporting operations of anti-ballistic defence. [PAAMS is a European programme similar to that of U.S. Standard. It is operated by DGA since 11/08/1999]

    The SAMP/T program is an army program under development, where Aster 30 is used for endo-atmospheric ballistic missile defense..
    It’s an assumption to say that, therefore it can be used on a ship.
    First you need a sensor to detect the TBM !

    Like Patriot, this inner-layer defense means, if you intercept a ballistic missile with a chemical warhead, the mess is even larger than if you don’t.

    That’s why exo-athmosperic BMD is under trails with the SM-3. Intercepts out of the atmosphere!
    But again, firts you have to detect the TBM, that’s where SMART-L comes in.

    in reply to: Improved FREMM #2071958
    7seas
    Participant

    Hello MConrads,
    I like your examples.
    I had the other Western European shipyards in mind. They are independant from missile/weapon/sensor suppliers.
    To publish so loud and clear: we do only Aster, sounds to me not as a smart negotiation strategy.

    There are only two shipyards in Greece: Elefsis has a MOU with DCN, the other Hellenic shipyard is part of TKMS.
    That means the missile choice dictates also the shipsorigin:
    – if Aster then FREMM or F124 or MEKO-D
    – if US missile then F124 or MEKO-D

    Things around FREMM become clear:
    it’s just a cheap vehicle to sell expensive missiles.

    Thanks for your nice drawing, and so fast!
    You must use building blocks. (tell shipyards how to!)

    in reply to: Improved FREMM #2071975
    7seas
    Participant

    Wow, that’s news!

    A pity that DCN has already denied offering that ship to Greece

    DCN will stick to the MBDA-supplied Aster family of missiles as the key anti-air warfare (AAW) weapons system for any export FREMM variant

    Is there any other shipyard in the world that takes a position as such ?

    If the Hellenic Navy stays at US missiles, their chance is down to zero!
    Are they extreme smart or extreme dumb ?

    in reply to: Schelde Combatant 12717: Dutch Stealth Frigate Proposal #2073138
    7seas
    Participant

    Advanced Lürssen Combat Craft ALCC, Innovative Kampfschiffe für die Zukunft

    VAJT wrote:

    I remember seeing an ad in a magazine of a design from Lurssen for a very similar looking ship. Unfortunately going to their website shows nothing.

    I think you mean this document:
    Advanced Lürssen Combat Craft ALCC, Innovative Kampfschiffe für die Zukunft

    in reply to: Schelde Combatant 12717: Dutch Stealth Frigate Proposal #2073358
    7seas
    Participant

    Schelde: Ongoing Innovation

    Hello,
    these attached photo’s where made less than a month ago at a Royal Schelde booth.
    So it seems that they still promote the concept.

    Have a nice trip
    7seas

    in reply to: Karel Doorman Frigates to Portugal? #2050026
    7seas
    Participant

    Find here sensors and weapons, according to this Dutch anti-weapon site
    http://www.antenna.nl/amokmar/wapens%20op%20Sigma%20klasse.html

    it will look like this:

    http://www.antenna.nl/amokmar/gif/Sigma.JPG

    From the Sigma brochure:

    http://www.antenna.nl/amokmar/images/sigma3s.jpghttp://www.antenna.nl/amokmar/images/sigma4s.jpg

    Find more here:
    http://www.antenna.nl/amokmar/folderSigmaklasse.html

    in reply to: Pic and info request. #2050086
    7seas
    Participant

    Sri Gaya class

    Taken end of 2005 during fleet review

    in reply to: Pic and info request. #2050110
    7seas
    Participant

    Combat Fleets 2005-6 writes:

    2 Sri Gaya–class Fast Troop Vessels (FTV) [LCP]
    Bldr: PSC–Naval Dockyard, Lumut

    331 Sri Gaya (In serv. 5-01)
    332 Sri Tiga (In serv. 2001)

    D: 116.5 tons (fl) S: 25 kts (loaded) Dim: 37.50 (30.30 wl) × 7.00 × 2.50

    A: 2 single 7.62-mm mg Electronics: Radar: 1 . . . nav.

    M: 4 M.A.N. D2842 LE408 diesels; 4 Hamilton Type 521 waterjets; 3,940 bhp tot.

    Electric: 160 kw tot. (2 × 80 kw, Cummins diesels driving)

    Range: . . ./. . . Crew: . . . tot. + 32 troops

    Remarks: Fully air-conditioned craft of aluminum construction, with the design based on that of the Australian WaveMaster commercial fast ferry. Can carry 4 tons of cargo (some of it refrigerated) in addition to the troops.

    I have made some photo’s of one of them.
    But have to dig.

    The attached one : from unknown photogapher

    in reply to: Karel Doorman Frigates to Portugal? #2050120
    7seas
    Participant

    Some Sigma building pics are here.
    http://www.DutchFleet.net

    The guy Nicolaaas (Nico Heertjes) works for KSG and seems to be not “photo limited”

    in reply to: Karel Doorman Frigates to Portugal? #2050222
    7seas
    Participant

    Hello Wanshan,
    taking pictures was not allowed by my host from KSG so no Sigma photo’s.

    Untill now, I have no Sigma renders.
    Will contact Thales at the next occasion.
    So wait and see.

    7seas
    Participant

    Some rare GK pics

    Taken during RNLN Naval day 2005
    Courtesy: Michel Bons http://de-kmarine.tripod.com/

    Tripod seems overloaded sometimes, here is the page:
    http://de-kmarine.tripod.com/nvd05.html

    http://de-kmarine.tripod.com/NVD05/nvd16.jpg

    http://de-kmarine.tripod.com/NVD05/nvd23.jpg

    http://de-kmarine.tripod.com/NVD05/nvd14.jpg

    http://de-kmarine.tripod.com/NVD05/nvd15.jpg

    http://de-kmarine.tripod.com/NVD05/nvd22.jpg

    Users of Goalkeeper:
    Qatar (4x Barzan class)
    UK (4x Albion class, 3x Invincible, 3x Illustrious, 4x Type22 Batch 3)
    UAE (2x S-frigate, 2x Muray Jip class)
    South Korea (3+3x KDX-I, 6x KDX-II, 1+1x LPX, 1x KDX-III)
    Chile (2x L-frigate)
    The Netherlands (2x Johan de Witt, 2x Rotterdam, 1x Amsterdam, 1x Zuiderkruis, 6x M-frigate, 5x LCF (Evertsen has 2) plus x? for overhaul roulation
    Some are re-used from M-frigates to Chile and S-frigates to Greece

    I’ll count at least 56 systems.
    Any corrections ?

    in reply to: Karel Doorman Frigates to Portugal? #2053291
    7seas
    Participant

    Advanced Sigma ?

    Hello Wanshan
    Mindef writes:
    The state has planned, taking into account conditions and price level, to grant the construction of the four patrol ships to the KSG.

    So it will be no K130 type of ship.
    A Sigma ?
    I think it will be a mod-advanced-Sigma.
    The RNLN has the tradition to control the overall design. The designs itself where made by NEVESBU.
    I think NEVESBU today, is part of KSG.
    I would not be supprised if the ship has an integrated topside arrangement in 1 or 2 masts. Have not seen those type of Sigma’s jet.

    B.t.w., I was invited to inspect the Indonesian Sigma’s.
    Those ships look great ! Clean, spacious, large stairs, all cables behind plates.
    Nice shape … wow!

    in reply to: Karel Doorman Frigates to Portugal? #2053385
    7seas
    Participant

    Not too bad !

    to Stonewall e.a.

    I think indeed that there is a “letter of intend” or something like that, that Portugal will buy two M’s.
    It’s based on the following observations.
    Mindef NL has said in 2005 that he was willing to think about 4 new ships if he was able to get a good price for the sell of 2 additional M’s.
    The situation before that moment was that the RNLN has to reduce and to sell 4 M’s and wouldn’t get back anything.
    So parlement suggested (also pushed by industry) to re-calculate the cost of operation of 2 M’s versus 4 new ships with low manning. In this way the navy would loose only 2 ships instead of 4.

    It’s an old Dutch tradition to ask the Mindef for something small and come up with something big. Like the LCF …. it’s still a frigate (of above 6000 ton)!

    At 18 May 2006 Deputy Mindef has answered parlement abouth his plans, so that means that he knows how much he will get for the sell of 2 M’s to Belgium and the 2 additional M’s to a non-disclosed country that would be preferable an European NATO partner.
    Letter to Parlement (in Dutch)

    Now would this be coincidence ?
    At 26-04-2006, the deputy Mindef signed a MOU with Portugal.
    http://www.mindef.nl/binaries/MOU_tcm15-61984.jpg
    26-4-2006: Materiel cooperation between the Netherlands and Portugal
    The Netherlands and Portugal have signed a Memorandum of Understanding today for cooperation in the area of materiel. State Secretary Van der Knaap signed on behalf of the Netherlands, while Dr. Manuel Lobo Antunes represented the Portuguese Ministry of Defence.

    In the letter to Parlement, one can read: in the middle of the year, this sell will be announced.

    Now in the same letter, 3 projects are announced:
    – a joint logistic support ship
    Replacement of the “Hr. Ms. Zuiderkruis”, but with expeditionary, Seabasing capabilities and disaster relief. With roll on/ roll of, elevator, helo landing spots. Manning of 175 with additional space for 300.
    This looks like a size between the Rotterdam and the new Johan de Witt with RAS and Crane facillities and for that a somewhat smaller superstructure.

    – 4 “patrouilleschepen”
    Not translated by intention ! As far as I remember (I left the RNLN in 1978) there is no clear perception of what a “patrouille schip” means.
    After WW II we have had “roofdier” class fregates, “jagers”, “Leander” frigates and the well known Tromp, S, L and M frigates.

    Now the Deputy Mindef writes:
    This Patrolship must be able to be used independently, everywhere in the world, be fast, for a long-term, under all circumstances and in short term applicable for a variety of tasks.
    It has capability for NH90 and launchers for two fast crafts.
    Manning 50 persons plus accomodation for additional 40 persons (f.i. boarding teams). Less administrators and technicians on board, but remote support and maintenance by 20 persons ashore.

    The set of sensors, weapon systems and commando facilities (sewaco) of patrol ship must be sufficient for local awareness – including small objects in coast surroundings -, local task-specific operations, and for commando of operations other than war.
    Contract mid 2007, delivery begin 2010.
    This schedule is in line with the earnings of the sell of the 2 + 2 M’s.

    😉 by 7SEAS:
    To me this means, a small frigate, with mission modules, advanced littoral sensors plus accurate gun capabilities (plural!) to support boardings and shot over the bow with a reasonable arm length (76mm with DART?)

    – Upgrade Walrusklasse
    First he underlines the importance of the sub capability.
    Called by the Deputy: “veiligheidsaanpassingen sonar Walrus”, something like security improvement.

    This is a part of a larger SLEP progam (or is it Boat Life Extension Program instead of Ship ?)
    Het talks about a Medium Range Sonar, Mine Avoidance Sonar and replacement of frequency analysis equipment.

    😉 by 7SEAS
    Seem to me a step-by-step approach of sensor replacement and CIC upgrade.

    All-in-all … not too bad.
    When the Mindef came in charge, he seems to be not pro-navy ( 😉 understatement).
    But his popularity is going up.
    He has proven to be a real transformational guy w.r.t. all forces.
    I think he is ahead of many writers on these boards, that still are comparing ships, based on massive missile load-outs against massive cold war attacks.

    And the RNLN ? They will be inventive enough, to give an advanced implementation of the plans of Mindef. As they did in all years before.
    Wait and see.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 57 total)