dark light

Sauron

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 1,366 through 1,377 (of 1,377 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: VC10 OR 707 #686516
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: VC10 OR 707

    Mongu
    You need to do a little research on why American commercial jets sold so well. The folks doing the buying bought them in large numbers because they were superior in all respects. The 707 was wide, comfortable, economical and not at all noisy.

    Regards

    in reply to: Boeing Offers New 747-400X #694379
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: Boeing Offers New 747-400X

    Funny how Boeing keeps selling those inferior designs. Boeings latest model twins still offer superior operating weights, capacity, ranges and costs than the Airbus lineup which proves that Boeing’s 60’and 70’s designs are still on a par with later designs from Airbus.

    Sauron

    in reply to: Lockheed Electra: Any still in commercial service? #699929
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: Lockheed Electra:

    I believe the Electra’s short commercial history was more a question of poor timing than anything. The Vicount and Vangard had the turboprop market pretty much sowed up before the Electra could make much market headway before the jets arrived. Who would have guessed it’s military ancestor would be bumping with Chinese fighters 40 years later. I would imagine all three of these birds may still fly commercially somewhere in the world.

    Regards

    in reply to: What the Smeg Is R.B. up to? #701257
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: What the Smeg Is R.B. up to?

    I agree with KabirT. Why in the world would Branson want to compromise a profitable buisness in a vain attempt to salvage what others could make work. Why support failures?

    Regards

    in reply to: Ryanair #702439
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: Ryanair

    Good news for Boeing that Ryanair is ordering 100 737-800’s. Ryanair is using essentually the same business model as Southwest and Westjet to maintain profitablity in poor ecomomic times. The 737 will contine to be the leader for some time to come.

    Also nice to see that Airbus politics and use of taxpayers money to undercut prices dosn’t always work.

    Regards

    in reply to: Biggest aircraft in the world??? #707466
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: Biggest aircraft

    I believe I read that Howard Hughes’s spruce goose had a greater wing span than the An 225, but in practical terms, the An 225 is much bigger. I believe it was specifically designed to transport the defunct Russian space shuttle the Braun, which was a copy of the NASA shuttle. The An 225 looks good at air shows, whereas the An 124 actually earns it’s keep transporting oversize industrial loads.
    The An 124 is a marvel of Russian aironautical engineering inspired by that US marvel, the C-5 Galaxy which flew 15 years before the An 124. Of course the An 124 was made slightly larger than the C-5 but is less handy and not as good looking. Whats that old expression: immatation is the sincerest form of flattery?

    Regards

    in reply to: Tragedy Strikes America Again – This is How I Feel #708522
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: Tall tale of woe

    Well, here we are again. One thread is not enough to spread your propaganda. Now you have another version of the same story, but this time you have wrapped it up in a blanket of false tears for the poor folks killed in the A300 crash in NY City. Its as transparent as it is disingenuous. No objective reading of your post fail to detect your real purpose. (By the way, how did you manage to become a doctor at the tender age of twenty-one)?

    Having said that, I can only add that I am annoyed with myself for having taken the bait you laid out. At my age, I should have known better than to encourage you. I apologize to those on the forum who had the good sense not to do the same.

    Sauron

    in reply to: My Parent's Nightmare at Philadelphia #708720
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: Grow up, Sauron.

    The stories above just seem suspicious to me. They seem crafted to try and make people think that US and its policies are to blame for what happened in NY City. That the US is really the bad guy. The individuals who did the crime were from the mid-east. That is the ugly fact. Unfortunately some folks from the mid-east and others who ‘look’ like them, are going to be suspect, unfair as that might be. Non US citizens who feel threatened or who have had their rights trod on should leave if they can. Ironically’ some probably have more rights as non-citizens in the US than in their native lands.

    History clearly shows that the US is not perfect but I believe the post WW II world would be far worse had it adopted a policy of non-involvment. Can you imagine what would have happened in Europe, in Japan, in the mid-east, and elsewhere, had the US not put it’s influence, democratic ideals, money, power and it’s blood on the line to counter the policies of the USSR, China and others? Who else would have been as generous to former foes for example? (the fact that these actions paid off economically, is not in question).

    The current problems in the middle-east and south-asia can hardly be laid solely at the door of the Americans. Who else has done more to protect Arabs and others in those areas? Europeans are not totally blameless. The UK, France, Italy and others have long meddled there and have been victems of terrorist attacks themselves, but as usual they let the US carry the ball. Its easy to blame the Americans when things go bad.

    As far as the middle-east and the rest of the Moslim world is concerned, maybe its time for Arabs and others to look at themselves more objectively. These areas could use more support from the US (and others) but ultimately, the individual states in these regions will decide what type of governments they want. They must also be willing to pay the price that goes with whatever decisions they make and not blame the US.

    Sauron

    P,S.
    I am not an American. No doubt about it though, I still have a lot to learn!

    in reply to: AMERICAN AIRLINES CRASH!!! #708751
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: AMERICAN AIRLINES CRASH!!!

    I saw the vertical stabilizer section come out of water on live TV. At the time I wondered how it could have separated so neatly from the body. Hard to tell on TV but no dents or scrapes were evident. If it was hit by an engine, could it look so neat? Contrary to above, the engines show no sign of a bird strike according to officals and are largly intact. Could be a structural problem rather than engine failure. Could be something sinister. Anyway, it seems odd that the engines, tail and body were scattered so widely.

    Regards

    in reply to: My Parent's Nightmare at Philadelphia #709001
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: My Parent’s Nightmare at Philadelphia

    Is this forum going to be hijacked be this kind of anti-American fiction? There are plenty of political sites for this kind of crap.

    in reply to: My Parent's Nightmare at Philadelphia #709458
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: My Parent’s Nightmare at Philadelphia

    Sounds like a fairy story to me. This is an aviation site, not a place for anti-American propaganda.

    in reply to: Is A380s future bright? #709969
    Sauron
    Participant

    RE: Is A380s future bright?

    Hard to get a rise out of folks these days. Must be the post Sep 11 styndrome. However, to respond to your question about the future of the A380, I think that its going to be a rocky road. For the moment the airlines are fighting to survive. The airline business is a money loser and thats not going to change until we are down to 12(?) or so large airlines worldwide that can profitably share the long haul routes which are the only ones that need the A380. Meantime, the airlines will probably put their limited funds into the large twins and the short haul commuter jets. Euro pride and public money may carry the A380 into production but IMO its will be delayed and when it does go ahead it will be a long time before it earns it’s keep.

    Regards

Viewing 12 posts - 1,366 through 1,377 (of 1,377 total)