dark light

hallo84

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 776 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PLA (All Forces) Missiles #1794725
    hallo84
    Participant

    Gents lets stick to the topic! hallo84 you have been warned.

    M’Pacha
    Moderator

    in reply to: Indian navy – news folder July 2007 #2049514
    hallo84
    Participant

    Date Posted: 14-Aug-2007
    Jane’s Navy International – September 01, 2007
    ________________________________________
    Indian Navy IAC suffers delay in keel laying
    Rahul Bedi

    The keel laying of the Indian Navy’s Project 71 Indigenous Aircraft Carrier (IAC) has been delayed by at least a year, pushing delivery from 2011-12 to 2015 or beyond. Assembly of the 37,500-ton carrier – also known as the Air Defence Ship – was scheduled to start in October 2007 at the state-owned Cochin Shipyard.
    But senior naval officers said the programme has been hit by material shortages and technical glitches caused by India’s inexperience in undertaking such an ambitious project.

    They warned the problems would also “substantially increase” the IAC’s build cost from the INR32.61 billion (USD802.7 million) sanctioned by the government. Although the first steel was cut in April 2005, construction of component parts did not start until November 2006 because of delays in acquiring 20,000 tons of special quality steel. This hold-up was exacerbated by impediments in obtaining 1,000 tons of bulb bars (steel stiffeners), which were eventually imported from Russia.

    An Indian Navy officer said: “More problems may emerge in future as we are on a learning curve.”
    Director General of Naval Design, Rear Admiral Mohinder Kumar Badhwar, told Jane’s in November 2006 that after building 120 of 800 hull blocks the IAC’s keel would be laid a year later. The ship would be launched by 2010, he declared at the time.

    News of delays in the carrier’s commissioning followed similar problems with the 45,400-ton Kiev-class carrier Vikramaditya, which is undergoing refurbishment at Russia’s Sevmash yard. Completion of the former Admiral Gorshkov has been postponed by three years to 2011.

    in reply to: Russia-China military cooperation on the rocks #2049516
    hallo84
    Participant

    I really wonder how the current Russian-Chinese Military cooperation could impact future Russian-Indian relations?

    Not really an impact. Russia is still playing both sides. Nationlistic pride aside no one loses and everyone gets what they want end of story.

    in reply to: Russia-China military cooperation on the rocks #2049785
    hallo84
    Participant

    Another thing to mention…. It did not indicate VLS of 054A frigate. I doubt Russia is the one who sells them. More of the indigenous product of PRC. If the author of that article indeed knows the real situation of Russia and China situation. He will have talk abt 054A frigate VLS. SInce no,I believe it is more of a make up from the author’s part regarding to his articles..

    Well Pinkov’s gotta make money somehow. He’s got a quota to fill every week.

    It’s not the first time he’s been caught pulling bull and it won’t be the last time his Russian sources feed him crap.

    We just have to overlook crap comming our way once in a while…
    What’s really funny is when Pinkov is dead wrong there are still boneheads that takes him seriously.

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2518148
    hallo84
    Participant

    Seems to be the Jh-7A.
    Should be the unit sent to Peace 2007 exercise.
    The helmet and the badge match those of official pics as does the flight suit.

    here is another pic
    http://i17.tinypic.com/6309jm0.jpg

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2518298
    hallo84
    Participant

    I thought that was a laser sensor to pick up hostile laser beams that are directed at the tank. :confused:

    That’s the RWR on the back but the box infront with the number display is a training device. No clue as to it’s function though.

    in reply to: Project 17A Frigate for India #2050700
    hallo84
    Participant

    Thats because there is an insane/brilliant guy called HSH who manages to sneak around and take some brilliant shots (Risking his butt big time on the way) 😀 😀 . Those are not offcial pics. Plus, it seems to have something to do with the locations of the shipyards. Shipsyards are being relocated and images just might be harder to come by in the future. When it comes to official pics, it could just be that the 2 nations have different philosophies.

    Nah It’s not only by HSH but really anyone who resides in Shanghai.

    The fact is because of the long history of Jiangnan, Its smack in the middle of the city and have accessible vantage points for photo ops.

    Further more there are a lot more rich chinese with nothing else better to do in life… how things have changed.

    in reply to: PLA (All Forces) Missiles #1795036
    hallo84
    Participant

    Can anyone confirm the DF-31a news from UPI?

    There was a photo of a new TEL with a caption saying new ICBM. Could very well be DF-31A or just DF-31 with more mobile tel. No way of telling which though.

    in reply to: Lafayette armed ASTER anti-air system #2051114
    hallo84
    Participant

    Just checked!

    Everything is as stated above but forgot Singapore who also use ASTER, they also use Harpoon instead of Exocett as well.

    With Taiwan the TC-2 Sky Sword air to air missile has been touted as an upgrade over the obsolete Chaparral system using some form of VLS. If I was Taiwan I would of adapted the rail launcher of the Cahaparral naval system to take TC-2 aam rounds as a short term stop gap to give a moderate improvement in area air defence capability.

    The TC-2 could be launched from slanted box launcher that’s on the truck system currently on display at the defence expo.

    They could just remove the rail system all together and save some weight.

    in reply to: Taiwan and Aegis Destroyers #2051641
    hallo84
    Participant

    Something no one seem to be taking note of is the operational environment that these Aegis DDGs are supposed to be operating in.

    For optimal effect, the DDGs would have to be somewhere in the straits in order to get a decent chance to intercept any SRBMs. The problem with that scenario is that PLA AShMs have ranges well in excess of the width of the straits, and its not like these DDGs are likely to be hard to spot and target at those ranges.

    You place the DDGs in the straits and they are as good as dead, and they will be unlikely to have played any meaningful role before they got vaporised. You put them on the other side of the island and their missile defense capacities would be greatly reduced since they would not be able to intercept the incoming missiles at the flight stage the missiles were designed for.

    If Taiwan gets the Aegis, it will not be for its SM3 capacity, but rather its radar and C&C gear, to allow them to have a powerful and surviverable sensor and command platform that could help to direct the war effort in the very likely scenario that all fixed land based sensor and command instillations would have been destroyed or badly degraded in the opening stages of a war with China.

    Having a carrier, even a small one with STOVL F35s would also greatly enhance Taiwan’s defensive capabilities as it would allow them to retain an air force for longer, and could potentially force the PLA to have to come out and hunt down the carrier or risk heavy losses to the invasion force, which = delay.

    Taiwan’s Achilles’ heal is its total lack of strategic depth, meaning nowhere is safe from attack. A carrier or two would give them that much needed breathing room and also make the odds of a successful PLA surprise attack longer since the PLA can’t be sure of being able to kill the carriers in the opening stages of a war.

    If I was in charge of Taiwan’s defenses, a carrier or two would be high on my wish list, even higher then F16s or any other non-STOVL land based plane because those planes are worse then useless without runways to operate from.

    Anyways, to recap, I think that Taiwan’s military is starting to accept the changing balance of power and are realizing that it is futile to try and match the PLA like for like. Especially in things like missile defense, as it is almost certainly going to be more expansive to defend against missiles then it is to attack with them = a hopeless situation for Taiwan.

    If they are seriously considering Aegis, then it should be about long term game plan as opposed to an all-or-nothing gamble at the start of a war. The idea should be to maintain a functional defense for as long as possible and hope the US decide to get involve and can do so in time as opposed to trying to stop every single one of the PLA’s hundreds if not thousands of SRBMs that are going to be fired at Taiwan in the event of war.

    The new F-16s are for replacing the trouble prone F-5s now and possibly the Mirage 2000-5 in the near future. Its a logical choice given the fact that F-35 won’t be operational any time soon.

    Interesting fact is Taiwan was looking into getting some Harriers so SVTOL maybe high on the list but delayed due to the lack of a suitable candidate.

    A better buy for Taiwan as opposed to the Aegis would be more La fayettes en mass to reduce the per unit price. They are already familliar with the ship plus Taiwan have the choice of fitting domestic AShM as opposed to expensive imports.

    in reply to: Taiwan and Aegis Destroyers #2051860
    hallo84
    Participant

    There is no debate, the procurement of SM-3 would not cause China to go to war- period. Frankly it is an absurd suggestion.

    The PAC-3’s were procured for BMD defense, and they offer the capability to greatly reduce the impact of a Chinese ballistic missile strike, thus aiding the preservation of the Taiwanese armed forces and civilian infrastructure, and the addition of SM-3 would further enhance that. It would be far from wasted VLS cells.

    http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2005/03/21/2003247172

    Ultimately if Taiwan wants to purchase Aegis with SM 3 or not is a chioce that’s not in the hands of PRC.

    The true problem with Taiwan’s purcahse is not the fact that the current minority gov’t pushing for it but rather even if it’s approved by US congress it would still be blocked by Taiwanese legislative yuan.

    The pro independence president is on its last breath. All new presidential candidates are already aware that antagonizing china isn’t good for business.

    So lets just leave it at that. Any future purchase that have any chance of going through would only be the F-16s.

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #11 #2521809
    hallo84
    Participant

    Explain please!

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Tanks/T-99_ModX/LRecCol1.jpg

    A training device.
    I’ve never seen it anywhere else but in pics of tank training school.

    in reply to: PLA (All Forces) Missiles #1795466
    hallo84
    Participant

    http://i9.tinypic.com/4tp2s12.jpg

    DF-21 ASBM…? or new DF-15?

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2054321
    hallo84
    Participant

    There you go, the real deal. 093 at dock:

    Hmmm… curious. Is this the first of class with the dive planes on the sail?

    in reply to: PLA (All Forces) Missiles #1795602
    hallo84
    Participant

    Between the antiship varient and the ground penetrator they are (apparently) testing they’re close to fielding something the US is nowhere near and that is the ability to strike time-sensitive targets in your range of interest. Of course you need to have good intel to be able to actually take advantage of the capability but if I were Taiwan I’d take the two VERY seriously.

    Taiwan to take PRC seriously? LOL not the least bit likely.
    Hell they recently promoted navy admiral who in his whole career, has never served on a ship. ROC military is a show piece full of idiots that are promoted by following the right political band wagon. Competant ability is only a after thought.

    Douglas Paal (AIT director) Said it best on his reflections of his Time in Taiwan.

    “The PRC has greatly improved its knowledge, and they have I must say close to complete knowledge of what is going on in Taiwan, if not complete understanding.”

    “I wouldn’t look first at the National Security Bureau(Taiwan) for an understanding of the mainland or to some other agencies in Taiwan, because they simply can’t attract people who are interested in that work.”

    http://www.brookings.edu/fp/cnaps/events/20060713.pdf

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 776 total)