dark light

hallo84

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 776 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft With Weird-Looking Modifications #2545410
    hallo84
    Participant

    not quite sure if this qualify as modification or rather a mismatch of parts…

    http://i11.tinypic.com/2vskuxj.jpg

    in reply to: Aircraft With Weird-Looking Modifications #2545415
    hallo84
    Participant

    Here is one that’s really fat…

    http://i3.tinypic.com/4gryqo4.jpg

    in reply to: Aircraft With Weird-Looking Modifications #2545502
    hallo84
    Participant

    Big wings that don’t fly…

    http://i14.tinypic.com/47jvj86.jpg

    in reply to: Aircraft With Weird-Looking Modifications #2545507
    hallo84
    Participant

    LOL 747 suffering from obesity

    http://i10.tinypic.com/49l3bxl

    in reply to: Aircraft With Weird-Looking Modifications #2545512
    hallo84
    Participant

    well the JASDF actually out did the Y-8 and snoopy…

    http://i9.tinypic.com/33l30qx

    in reply to: Aircraft With Weird-Looking Modifications #2545588
    hallo84
    Participant

    This is gotta be the most ugly mod.

    hallo84
    Participant

    For now I will take most of this report with a pinch of salt. However the 2010 date keeps coming up and to me that seems like a reasonable amount of time for the PLAN to get the Varyag operational in one form or another. Further more Varyag is ‘non-atomic’ and fits within the tonnage range given for the transitional carrier in the above article. It seems that every week it becomes more and more likely that Varyag will enter service with the PLAN.

    Very interesting, thanks for posting.

    Well we’ve seen PLAN with its two step approach to war shops now. ie 052C and 051C.

    The carrier could also be the case. Although there is no confirmation but increasing the consensus is that the Carrier will be new built and not the Varyag.

    A nuke carrier will actually surves PLAN better as it eases the burgen of replenishing a carrier and increases the range of operability of such a naval task group.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2549466
    hallo84
    Participant

    Hsung Ying or Xiong Ying, it sounds the same, though I like to see what is the actual intonation. I think “Male Eagle” just sounds way too weird.

    well didn’t they name their antiship missile Hsung feng which means brave wind.

    Hsung Ying could just be brave eagle.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2552597
    hallo84
    Participant

    http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/070313/1/bi19.html

    Article and photo in Chinese, dated 13 March 2007.
    The ROCAF F-5E/F is named Zhong Zheng, after the late ROC President Jiang Zhong Zheng.
    As the current ROC government, under President Chen, has been removing references to China, the KMT (Chinese Nationalist Party), and the ROC from the names of ROC government and non-government organisations and sites, such as the KMT memorial hall and ROC post office, by changing “Zhong Hua XXX” to “Taiwan XXX”; some politicians suggest the ROCAF F-5E/F nickname should be dropped.

    LOL the name changing issue is surprisingly a dumb move on the part of DDP and playing into PRC hands…
    Now Taiwan is defacto the “province” Taiwan at the cost of Taiwanese industry that has to bare significant losses.

    http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/070318/4/bq4z.html

    Article in Chinese, dated 19 March 2007.
    Rumour about ROCAF resurrecting the concept of buying AV-8B, because the USA has stalled the sale of F-16C/D to Taiwan.

    Heh the AV-8B again. Didn’t they reject the original offer due to the refusal of blue vixen radar? Now most of the current airframes are antiques and more suited to be in a museum.
    considering that the offer is made along with the eurofighter, Bae seems to be despirate to sell a platform… any platform.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2553404
    hallo84
    Participant

    pic 1 is ROCA not PRC.

    note the Chinook…

    pic 4 looks like type 23…

    in reply to: Beriev A-50 awacs capabilities #2553534
    hallo84
    Participant

    and this is just another AAW DDG with a phased array radar system

    Well most of the time its the western media that mades mastakes in labeling new platforms with american platform in mind.

    i.e. the 052C was never labeld aegis until Kanwa coined the term red aegis.
    Then people picked up the term and somehow it even made it onto the annual report to congress. Now you can’t condemn people for using the term since it already have seen widespread use.

    If it’s like comparing mandarines and oranges and condeming those that call a mandarines an orange. Its nice if they knew the difference but quite inconsequential as we know what they mean.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2553826
    hallo84
    Participant

    http://hk.news.yahoo.com/070314/12/23om0.html

    Article dated 14 March 2007.
    Cyborg birds at Shan Dong University of Science and Technology, Qing Dao City, Shan Dong Province.

    More like remote controlled bird…
    LOL they can term it BIO-UAV

    Although this really have nothing to do with PLAAF. It’s a privately funded basic research that has no corrent application in mind.

    in reply to: Pics Of PAF Receiving JF-17 #2555040
    hallo84
    Participant

    does this mean PAF is going to conduct weapons integration iteself?

    Do they have another radar in mind?
    Or more importantly what missile do they intend to use since the Chinese maybe unwilling to give out operating code of the SD-10.

    And what ever happened to the no RD-93 for Pakistan?

    in reply to: How difficult it is to modify J-10 for carrier landing? #2555704
    hallo84
    Participant

    Carrier landing is quite a challenge as the airplane must be designed for ~6 m/sec sink rate at touchdown. Then it has to be arrested and brought to a stop within 60m. It helps if the landing speed is slow <240km/h (usually accomplished by adding wingspan), but slow speed often causes controllability to suffer. To get to the touchdown spot, the roll and pitch rates must remain high, necessitating huge control surfaces. (Those huge control surfaces can help with nose pointing in low speed ACM, which is why you never get slow when fighting an F-18). J-10 would need more wingspan, bigger control surfaces and at least 1000kg in structural beef up to attempt CV operations.

    Well if rafale can manage a landing at what is considered suicidal attack angle to most then I don’t see any reason that J-10 can make it but it does need to be beefed to increase structural support.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2556287
    hallo84
    Participant

    ] Seriously, the PRC and the CCP are AFAIK fundamentally ruled by a committee of nine CCP elders, two of whom are Uncle Hu and Uncle Wen. One of the nine, Huang, is as ill as Castro, and fails to appear at the national meetings now going on in Bei Jing.

    Wow you must think Hu and Gang must be geniuses’… in order for them to single handily know all the problems and decide upon the course of action for the every law and regulation that is passes during congress.
    The truth is Hu know as much about the country as his underlings is willing report and he has as much decision power as the amount of solutions proposed by the national congress. He doesn’t draft the laws, or control interest rate, or order the deployment troops, or simply has any say in the amount of pay a soldier gets.
    Most likely the only difference between Hu and Bush is that Hu doesn’t leave office after 4 years.

    Btw Huang isn’t ill per say, but ill because his personal underling the then chief secretary (comparatively one step up from mayor) of shanghai is sacked for cruption charges. H’s just riding out the waves till he retire.

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 776 total)