dark light

hallo84

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 776 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2556289
    hallo84
    Participant

    Hving looked it up and knowing very well how the funding system of the PLA works I know that the proposals put forward are in reality nothing more than suggestions.

    Maybe you are looking in the wrong place?
    Here is a snipet from Xinhua new.
    http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2007-03/05/content_5800738.htm
    廖锡龙指出,当今世界并不太平,为了维护国家安全稳定和领土完整,必须适度加大对军队现代化建设的投入,适度增强装备和战场配套建设经费,逐步增加人民解放军信息化条件下防卫作战的能力。适应人民解放军大抓军事训练的需要,今年的国防费安排,还将围绕首长机关指挥和谋略训练、诸军兵种联合训练、新装备训练、专业技术训练、院校教育等重点,进一步加大经费投入,特别是优先保障复杂电磁环境下训练保障条件建设和各项演练活动需要。部队战备训练强度不断加大对士兵体能提出了新的要求。为了保障士兵能够吃饱、吃好、吃的有营养,同时抵消物价上涨对士兵伙食带来的影响,今年还将再次提高全军士兵的伙食费标准,确保士兵的营养水平稳中有升,以充沛的精力和体能投入到战备训练中。

    The article is in chinese but is a interview by general Liao Xi Long after the announcement of budget increase (member of CMC, head of PLA Logistics currently attending national congress in Beijing)

    He commented the major uses of the increase of funding which included increase standard of living, benefits, pay for troops, increase the level of infomization and IT within force structure, increase level of training, joint force exercises, National defence university funding, training uder EW conditions etc. (more likely NCO, officer training and more exercises ala NTC style brigade,regiment tactical training).

    I would also add increases in fuel costs also take a significant amount out of the funding so much so that a few days ago PLA was ordered to conserve fuel to save costs.

    When looking at PRC military budget people usually only focus on equipement puchase but military spending include much more than that. PLA need new equpement but not as much as it need to update its war fighting skills that is still to seperate it self from the Mao era peoples war docterine. Such transformations cost much more in the long run than procuring new fighter jets or new ships. It needs funding for not only a new command structure but a whole new logistics chain.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2556377
    hallo84
    Participant

    Wrong. Extra funding means more money thus opening up the possibility of increased procurement levels.

    Whatever… if that’s who you feel about it.
    But historically that’s not how PLA works though. They don’t simply ramped up production rates when more funding is available. It doesn’t work that way.
    Usually everything sticks to a plan and changes are gradual not absolute. Funding increases isn’t decided by PLA or even CMC but agreed by Peoples congress made up of representatives much like house of commons. How the funding is used is also included in the proposal. If you bother to look it up then you’d know that J-10 procurement didn’t make it on the list.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2505715
    hallo84
    Participant

    You seriously think that all J-10 procurement has been budgeted?:rolleyes:

    Why not? The cost of creating the two assembly lines have already been paid for. The design have finalized and although testing is still ongoing its more likely just on a tactical level at FTTC.

    The only cost would be the new airframes which can come out of the development funding.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2505931
    hallo84
    Participant

    The official Chinese defense budget is to increase by 17.8% this year, so it looks like we will be seeing alot more J-10’s.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/6416633.stm

    hmmm the J-10 should already have been budgeted. The project has been under development for so long and the production line has been completed. I don’t see how the cost of production translate to 17% increase….

    The increase in spending would more likely be used in increasing salary pay and new projects like the possibility of a carrier and air wing.

    in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2508007
    hallo84
    Participant

    http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/news/20070225i202.htm
    reported:

    25 February 2007:
    In Japan, the joint Fukuoka and Shizuoka prefectural police investigation HQ announced the Yamaha agricultural UAV helo, when modified, can be flown beyond visual range, for up to a few klicks; through a monitor with live imaging from the UAV.

    OTOH, Yamaha claimed the standard version, sold to Commie China, can’t fly beyond visual range, has a radio control radius of 150-200 m, and ceiling of 150 m.

    I don’t know why the Japanese want to keep spinning this story.

    I hope they realize that Shanghai Jiao Tong University already had a heli UAV hammered out in the early 90s.

    in reply to: Japan to consider F/A-22 to replace its F-4s #2511931
    hallo84
    Participant

    http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20070221-00000135-jij-soci

    Looking for the next F-X, the F-4 replacement, 10 JASDF staff will visit the makers of the F-15FX, F/A-18, and Typhoon, from 25 April 2007, for 19 days.
    Doesn’t mention the F-22 or F-35.

    BTW, it’s obvious and reasonable, but just noticed the JDA site has updated its URL from
    http://www.jda.go.jp/
    to
    http://www.mod.go.jp/
    since 9 January 2007.

    Guess what are the chances of Japan ending up with more F-15s…

    I’d but it would turn out like the South Korean F-15 deal with typhoon used as a bargaining chip.

    They have the F-15J that also may retire soon. The new airframes can draw fom the current F-15 pilot pool.

    in reply to: PLAN Thread (Pics, news, speculations…everything) – 2 #2066167
    hallo84
    Participant

    here’s pics of 054A VLS curtasy of gordonblade from CDF.

    What’s interesting is the original 054 going in for modifications.
    The HQ-7 and FCR have been removed. Probably fitting a similar VLS system on the 054A. I’m guessing that the original 054 plan was modified into the 054A but basic hull design and water displacement should be roughly the same.
    http://i13.tinypic.com/42lablh.jpg
    http://i13.tinypic.com/3y7utzq.jpg

    in reply to: How much possibility of these are China N.G.F.? #2515213
    hallo84
    Participant

    oooh id like to see those Mig and Sukhoi PS pics!

    And seriously who do you think you are fooling here?

    most of your composites industry is being trained by the west, one of your biggest industries (leisure boats) still cant get to the same level of quality that is found in products made by a part timer in the uk.

    your aerospace industry is being helped by the Russians engineers and scientist along side English, French and any other national that sees investment potential..

    Wake up and sniff the coffee, nationalism is great, but realism is better!

    LOL another case of screaming, kicking and jerking “mommy my imported toy is better than his” episode.

    You should wake up and smell the coffee yourself.

    During a press briefing at MAKS 2005 Sukhoi publically disclosed that PAK FA entered into an advanced stage of development. If It this wasn’t a publicity stunt to grab funding I don’t know what is.

    I don’t doubt that CAC has foreign tech input but that does not change the fact that J-XX have no funding restrictions and CAC don’t need to publicize it in a foreign country in order to continue the project.

    The difference of how PLAAF choose to disclose info and how Russians are doing it is bloody apparent if you arn’t blinded by blatant nationalism as you so willingly want to bring up.

    here is the PS you wanted so much.

    in reply to: How much possibility of these are China N.G.F.? #2515236
    hallo84
    Participant

    The Chinese are struggling with introducing their current fighter, which has not yet reached the technology level of latest 4th gen fighters. So all the stuff is crap².

    struggling? I really won’t term it so. Chinese do things differently than the rest of the world. J-10 like most of other chinese projects wasn’t officially acknologed until it reached operational status. CAC or SAC arn’t like Mig or Sukhoi that need to post PS pics of bygone plane to attract foreign funding.
    Stuff like J-XX won’t very be advertised in China unless PLAAF has a regiment or two flying. Unlike the PAK-FA which have had so much hype for basically nothing solid.

    hallo84
    Participant

    Yeah FC-1 manager is very smart thats why we hear about engine issue decade later in every news media. it destroys the export reputation of project. and his desparate enough to use decade old smokey engine on first flight. (IN didnot allow this for first flight of MIG-29K). they need to learn alot.

    FC-1 has a strict time schedual to follow.

    Most Indian projects don’t. They can take as long as they want and if they still need more time they’d simply delay everything by introducing a new procurement plan.

    hallo84
    Participant

    Forget about the lense explanation, it’s obviously PS’d. NOT the FC-1, that’s genuine, but something in the background has been erased (almost all the upper left part of the picture is re-done).
    Look at the nozzle, it’s sharp; if it had been a lense effect it would have been blured too, like the tail…

    good call! The runway markings don’t line up seem to me to be an amature job of feathering with too much pixels and bad use of Clone/heal tool…
    THe JF_17 should be genuine

    in reply to: The potential AEGIS futre and possible upgrades. #2067273
    hallo84
    Participant

    The indigenous development of OYQ-6 battle management system is redundant but that’s the case in many Japanese weapons procurement. We can go as far as to say it’s a tradition.

    The OYQ-6 system manages Link-11/14 data and ORQ-1 data from helicopters through a set of UYK-7 and a set UYK-20 computer. It is interfaced with various UYA-4 consoles.

    Newer ships have been upgraded with the OYQ-7 system based on the UYK-43 computer and UYK-4 fire control computer. Consoles been upgraded with colour display UYQ-21/OJ-194.

    What’s funny is that the whole system is still based largely on American made components i.e. the computers.
    Sounds like a rip-off to me… but qute a few different surface platform use the same system.

    in reply to: China Tests Anti-Satellite Weapon #2524181
    hallo84
    Participant

    LOL! Yeah, I know. Was just giving you sh!t sry. The interesting thing about the Taiwan shoot-downs is apparently the only ones that got shot down were the ones where their ECM WAS working. (According to Ben Rich anyway).

    😎

    I thought the ECM was over powered by the ancient tracking radar of the SAM2?

    Corrections on the U-2 not flying there… They did fly… in crates… on C-133…

    in reply to: Canadian Navy cuts #2067347
    hallo84
    Participant

    hah great call

    Now we’ll have a definate excuse to not participate anymore in naval operations in the gulf.

    But why are the CP-140 Auroras being replaced drones?
    I thought the Auroras with acutal crew were crucial to our boarder claims?

    in reply to: China Tests Anti-Satellite Weapon #2524271
    hallo84
    Participant

    they didn’t get there on a train.

    They sure as hell didn’t fly there. Taiwan only had A/C model.

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 776 total)