dark light

hallo84

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 776 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Japan's new fighter #2610627
    hallo84
    Participant

    The problem for the Japanese is that the defense sector of any country is supported by the government and export sales. Japan can’t export weapons under its constitution, and it’s domestic defense market is relatively small.

    Even if they could export aircraft, the aerospace industry today is extremely competitive and dominated by established players. Whether it’s a new fighter or a new airliner, they’d have to go into a market dominated in the 1st world by the likes of Boeing, airbus, EADS, Lockheed, Russian, and Chinese manufacturers.

    Trying to build an indigenous fighter from the ground up probably seems like a daunting and extremely expensive risk to them.

    Well said… that i believe this is the main reason for the slow developement of Japanese homebred a/c. The future for Japanese aerospace industry lies with electronics upgrade of existing aircrafts and new munitions rather than the developement of a new aircraft!

    in reply to: Japan's new fighter #2610633
    hallo84
    Participant

    Japan is under no illussion as to who threatens there way of life and economy…hence the substantial reallocation of funds into missile defence and the reduced F-2 buy. This would suggest their future aircraft would be a modified F-15 or F-35.

    The correct assessment of threats and the economics $$$ will determine the future fighter buy….threats and money make for intersting bed-fellows, and should japan and other asian counties seek more autonomy from the US…then it would be interesting to see how they may partner themselves in the future. The UK and France managed to produce the Concord, Jaguar, Lunx and Puma in the 60-70’s and still managed to be at loggerheads with each other over other policies. Threats and $$ make interesting partners.

    You are partly right as to the economic that derive the future fighter buy but I truely don’t believe that any southeast asian nation with sufficient technological base would consider a arms venture with japan in the near future. Espically not China or Korea. The only possible choice is Taiwan but taiwan has a many political restrictions that would render such a COOP ineffective. This is a different thing than the anglo-franc relations…

    in reply to: Japan's new fighter #2610895
    hallo84
    Participant

    Japan should consider developing a fighter industrial base with Korea, Taiwan and Singapore..the issues of money and technology look good..regional cooperation may be the stubling block.

    Coop with other asian nations like the euro fighter is definately not possible.
    Due to already high tensions and i doubt that either Korea or Singapore can reason it’s citizen to trust the japanese…

    in reply to: Japan's new fighter #2610898
    hallo84
    Participant

    …due to political reason the JSF is the only reasonable choice!
    And japan may persuade the american to transfer part of the production to japan as a reasult, so it a double wammie…

    in reply to: Stupid Decisions & Pointless Aircraft #2611933
    hallo84
    Participant

    Well one stupid decision was by the indian government not to fund for additional powerplant for HF-24. Another dumb decision is to suspend aerospace development by denying FBW research, again on HF-24.
    Really dumb, lost out atleast 3-4 decades of design experience..

    … it’s all about money… i think india at the time needed to pour all the mooney onto economic developement rather than defence spending…

    in reply to: Seen somewhere EF2000 is close to 12t #2611935
    hallo84
    Participant

    Last I heard, it would be cheaper to leave the gun in it’s place and not use them. Rather than try to design something to take its place and balance the plane properly.

    .. didn’t they say it was cheaper to leave dead weight in place of the gun that was techinically useless in modern warfare as almost all interceptions are conducted with missiles???

    in reply to: Stupid Decisions & Pointless Aircraft #2624474
    hallo84
    Participant

    Canada wasn’t hostile towards anyone so they wouldn’t have been targeted by the USSR? You’re 100% sure that the Soviet Union wouldn’t have targeted Canada as a NATO ally? Might want to rethink that one, they certainly had enough warheads.

    Why would the soviets waste nukes on an army that can hardly adequately arm itself let alone defende the country?

    there is only about 1 million reason why the canadian military is just a tin can!

    anyway by attacking Canada the Soviets have to also worry about the US! We have joint defence, so the states are required to defend Canada at all cost if war break out and the agressor wasn’t Canada!

    Bluntly put…Why do we need an expensive military when we have the Americans?

    in reply to: Stupid Decisions & Pointless Aircraft #2624505
    hallo84
    Participant

    Ah but consider the Cold War thinking of the time-what good is a railroad if Soviet bombers can fly unimpeded through your airspace and melt your cities with nasty thermonuclear weapons? 😀

    Canada was not very hostile towards anyone so I can disregarde your comment as to soviet nukes on canadian soil.

    … we have the americans doing the dirty work why do we need anything else??? that was the original idea behind the US-Canada military cooperation.
    Get it? that why we have CF-18 because our defence budget are linked!
    Besides of which the americans have large influence on many Canadain decision due to economical reasons.

    The CPR Railroad was essential to canada as it connected the isolated western coast with the east…essentially it was the reguiment BC province had for it to join the federal government!

    in reply to: Stupid Decisions & Pointless Aircraft #2624557
    hallo84
    Participant

    Jonesy brother… 😀
    i’ve got one stupid that matches or even surpases duncan sandy’s for his decision…
    the name of “that other thing…” john defenbaker (or whatever the hell way of writing that) for canceling the Avro Arrow. (Canada) he argued “exactly the same” :rolleyes:

    may those 2 “individuals” roth in hell :diablo:

    Camaro.

    We may all like the arrow..that includes me.
    It was way ahead of its time when it was developed the only problem was it costed too much to develope and Canada just don’t have the resources! It was either have the Arrow or cancel the railroad… So how would you decide???

    in reply to: Stupid Decisions & Pointless Aircraft #2624563
    hallo84
    Participant

    Its not the thing with Su-30MKK, the Chinese want their own domestic aircraft, but why the JH-7A when the J-10 could do the job as well, it could carry a vg payload, it’s range is decent and such, would’ve been a lot less cheaper.

    The J-10 don’t have the range to reach the Spralty islands and the disbuted waters in asia. The PLAN had a had time fighting in the islands with Vietnam at the time because their plane could not reach there!

    in reply to: Raptor crashes! #2630203
    hallo84
    Participant

    thank goodness pilot is fine. kudos to ACES! plane crashed on takeoff? could it still be salvageable?

    salvageable? in a ball of flames??? it’s as salvageable as a heap of scrape

    in reply to: General Discussion #393614
    hallo84
    Participant

    yes on expensive SLR camera and lens!

    espically the camera which may produce a lot of ware and tear and of course the free cleaning!!!

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation part IV #2633383
    hallo84
    Participant

    Can any one differentiate briefly China made J-11 and Su-27?

    Thanks

    John

    J-11 domestic product except the N001 radar and the AL-31 engine, later versions carry domestic WS10 engine. Su27 is made in KNAPPO.

    same plane.. although russian test pilot claim the two planes handles a little differently due to domestic engine.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation part IV #2633618
    hallo84
    Participant

    Tu-22 for China?

    Today’s local Chinese news paper in North America.

    May be Su34 ???

    in reply to: no Japanese ICBMs — for the time being #2051721
    hallo84
    Participant

    As an overseas Chinese, the lesson I learned on the Japanese atrocities of WW2 has been that every human has the potential to carry out extremely horrible deeds. Not just the Japanese. And so we will have to keep ourselves in check and remember WW2, not to condemn the Japs, but to remind ourselves never to commit such horrors. Their actions just showed us what horrors we (yes, you and me) are capable of.

    Sadly, my impression of Mainland Chinese is that their lessons drawn was that Japanese are an ‘evil’ race, and so they continue looking at Japanese with hatred and distrust. In fact, after looking at some of the more extremist Mainland Chinese outbursts, I believe that my point of view is only confirmed – some of the Mainland Chinese are really morphing into the ‘vile beasts’ that they accuse the Japanese of. They cannot seem to get over the fact that WW2 happened 3 generations ago. (And China only recently accused Japan of having a Cold War mentality, who’s the one having a WW2 mentality, I wonder?)

    Well… your concerns are noted… but it is without bases!
    We do not base our view of the Japanese solely on history but upon the action of its people! Japanese have a mentality that praise the victor and to him goes all the spoils. According to the Japanese that would be the Americans, so as to modernize Japan most Japanese learn to speak English, they learned the ways of the west. But other Asian are of another story…Japanese regard them as the weaklings that are not to be regarded as on the same level! This mentality is evident throughout Japanese society. Japanese thus led to believe that what they did in WW2 wasn’t infect atrocity but an act of nature where the weak fall prey to the strong! Why does this sound so familiar???

    And how are the Chinese morphing into the ‘vile beasts’ you claim???
    Did we murder innocent civilians??? Did we conduct Biological and Chemical test on the POWs??? Did we conduct germ warfare??? Did we lie to our people about what we did and did not do in WW2??? Did we claim 50 years after the war that the People we killed in WW2 were for the good of those people???

    Don’t forget the Victims of WW2 have not yet all passed away so I wouldn’t call it a long time ago!!! That’s why the JFK file is not yet to be declassified for another 70years, not all of the parties involved are diseased.

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 776 total)