dark light

I.P.Freely

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 posts - 91 through 92 (of 92 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 388th BG pics #2107976
    I.P.Freely
    Participant

    Originally posted by Snapper
    In a word: No. Moggy does not own the images, nor have reproduction rights. He only has some copies of originals belonging to him. And a parsons nose.

    Honk!

    Showing picture online, is that considered reproduction?

    In a way, it could be considered that since everytime person sees it, they are making a duplicate on their hard drive.

    Oh well, off with his head then. Lock him up and throw away the keys. Becasue he has done everybody a great disservice by showing pictures that might never have been seen again.

    in reply to: 388th BG pics #2107992
    I.P.Freely
    Participant

    Hello everyone.

    Never posted on this forum before, but I have to tell you, one of the reason I got interested on this forum was because of the Pictures that Moggy had posted.

    In the light of what has happen, if the owner of the photographer cannot be identified, and if Moggy was given permission to scan them by the person who had the possession, doesn’t that give him right to do as he wishes with the digitized pictures?

    Suppose I took pictures of Mona Lisa, do I have to get permission from the Louvre, to show it online to people?
    I think posting on a forum constitutes a personal usage. In US only restriction is Reproduction or Sales of the photograph. And as long as Moggy sells the scans, he shouldn’t have any problems.

Viewing 2 posts - 91 through 92 (of 92 total)