dark light

alexz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 276 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is the market for light fighters shrinking? #2191783
    alexz
    Participant

    Since the end of the cold war, and with the huge amount of F-16s still available, the market for cheap lightweight fighters has dried up. Even more so now LM has devised a SLEP for F-16 that would increase its life to an amazing 13,856 flying hours. A used F-16 with SLEP and upgrade to F-16V standards can be had for less than a brand new Gripen C for example.

    Still there would be countries that would prefer a lower operating costs than a F-16, or something that could also double as LIFT platform too.

    Markets? Countries that currently have no fighters or having small old fleets would be a good candidate for new lightweight fighters as their main fighter platform. Or countries with only air policing and CAS taskings. I can say Croatia, Slovak, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Austria, Botswana, Kenya, Argentina, Mexico, Sri Lanka. Or countries that has a mix of hi-lo performance fighters. This would be Vietnam, Malaysia, Egypt, Iran, Peru, Colombia, Switzerland, Ukraine. Still the market is small, something like only 500 aircrafts. Could be more if the same aircraft can be used as LIFT too.

    Aircrafts available now are the L-15B, JF-17, FA-50, M-346FA, Gripen C (it will still be marketed even when the E model is mass produced), Tejas. All are supersonic capable except the M-346FA.

    If you are very2 low on cash but still need a brand new lightweight fighter, there is the Guizhou FTC-2000 still available at less than 10 mil usd per aircraft.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2195011
    alexz
    Participant

    Thanks all for the replies.

    It is said that there was also 2 SF.260TW ordered by Comores?

    Any other stories regarding this Comores SF.260 order?

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2206070
    alexz
    Participant

    Or sudan probably?

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZQZRhaWAAEgXaR.jpg

    By the way anyone have any pictures of comoros sf-260?

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2206509
    alexz
    Participant
    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2207243
    alexz
    Participant

    Any news on the Diamond DART as the new chinese basic trainer? Also there are some saying that the CJ-6 is still in production, bangladesh and sri lanka are getting new build examples? Any pictures of new build CJ-6s?

    in reply to: Korean Aviation Industry Thread #2207375
    alexz
    Participant

    This is basically a license built Aerospatiale Puma with a hideous gorilla nostrill like air intake. It would only sell if it is cheaper than blackhawks, 412s, AW139s etc etc.

    in reply to: It's early 1989 and you're flying in hostile airspace…. #2127081
    alexz
    Participant

    Wish to say the Saab Viggen, but i’ll choose the SU-27S. Has good combination of R-73 and R-27 missiles; good radar range and IRST; Shchel-3UM HMD that enables look to kill capability combined with the R-73 missile. Yes it is “officially” in service in 1990, but it is already operational as early as 1987, during the close encounter with Norwegian P-3C.

    in reply to: Rafale 2017-2 #2127910
    alexz
    Participant

    Parrikar on the Indian Rafale:

    About the process:

    Indeed a messy process!

    http://indianexpress.com/article/india/manohar-parrikar-justifies-rafale-costs-aircraft-smaller-part-real-cost-in-equipment-4975834/

    LOL probably parrikar didn’t know that india already has that “helmet to be worn by the pilot where a target (gets) locked by just watching the target” since mid-80s as it is a standard equipment on the MiG-29 and also later the Su-30MKI.

    And if you need a 100km range missile, just buy that damn 100km missile and fit it on the MKI, not as a lame reason to buy the rafale.

    in reply to: What is in the F/A-50? the other golden eagle #2138947
    alexz
    Participant
    in reply to: Future for the batch 1 River Class #2004982
    alexz
    Participant

    Those ships still have a long useful life left.

    They could join their sisterships in Brazil (along with HMS Ocean)

    Bangladesh has a long history of taking over RN patrol ships.

    Philippines maybe? Would have said Chile, but they are bulding their own Fassmer OPV80s.

    Thailand would be a long shot…

    in reply to: Canadian Fantasy Fleet #2005112
    alexz
    Participant

    Odense has proposed an ASW-centric Huitfeld design to australia. Probably that would be a fit for Canada too?

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/inquirer/navy-submarines-in-a-30bn-race-to-the-future/news-story/799f3bdeeba7d5f04372ec34885172eb

    in reply to: Canadian Fantasy Fleet #2005120
    alexz
    Participant

    Jonesy,

    Isn’t the iver huitfeld and the type 26 are of the same size? The type 26 is actually larger than the iver huitfeld. What is the reasoning of having 2 types of similarly sized frigate instead of just one?

    in reply to: Canadian Fantasy Fleet #2005152
    alexz
    Participant

    This is my take on the Canadian fantasy fleet, not too flashy and mainly like for like replacements of current capability

    • Halifax replacements.
    4x Absalons. As command ships, army support, MCM, HADR.
    8x Iver Huitfeldts

    • Kingston replacements
    12x Fassmer OPV-80 with ice-strengthened hull. With deployable containerized MCM systems, containerised towed ASW sonars.

    • Submarines
    4-6x Shortfin Barracuda or the DolphinII

    • Arctic Offshore Patrol Ship
    6x Harry DeWolf class

    • AOR
    3x Protecteur class

    Overseas fly the flag deployments could be economically done with the long ranged (8600NM) OPV-80s, instead of the Absalons or Huitfeldts. For those with multinational task forces the Absalons and Huitfeldts would be used.

    The OPV-80 with its ice-strengthened hull would be ideal for patrols around canadian waters, compared to other designs.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2143263
    alexz
    Participant

    How reliable is this alleged purchase?

    We’ll have to wait for the official contract signing in december to know that.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2143269
    alexz
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 276 total)