dark light

alexz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 276 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The future of Austrian fighter fleet #2166910
    alexz
    Participant

    The option of keeping typhoons would entail getting 3 more 2 seater tranche1 typhoons while still having to get a replacement for the saab 105OE.

    The new type would need to be economical enough to be used as a LIFT for new pilots while capable enough to be used for all weather air policing missions.

    The gripen has no build in training systems for LIFT missions, its twin seater is mostly used for operational conversions to the type.

    I don’t know if austrians still have non-white man product allergies as the TA/FA-50 is built by small-eyed yellow skinned asians…

    BTW going for a KAI solution could mean getting the KAI KT-1 trainer as the pc-7 replacement. A KT-1, TA-50 and FA-50 combination for all of the stated austrian requirements.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2168522
    alexz
    Participant

    I am sure that the Teja will fit right in the equation.

    I would rather trust the koreans to deliver goods on time rather than the indians.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2168678
    alexz
    Participant

    Austria looks for new fighter as Eurofighter retirement looms.

    Eurofighter: These Are the Potential Successors

    They are looking at lower performance fighters with economic operating costs. Basically supersonic air policing fighters. The best fit would be the golden eagles, in TA-50 and FA-50 guise for both training and operational duties.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2172288
    alexz
    Participant

    Croatia has sent RFI’s to USA, Sweden,ISrael and Soth Korea for Mig-21 replacements. The contennders are F-16 (usa and israel), Gripen (sweden) and FA-50 (south korea)

    https://www.vecernji.hr/vijesti/hrvatska-krece-u-nabavu-borbenih-zrakoplova-f-16-barak-ili-gripen-1178689

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2177023
    alexz
    Participant

    FC-31 model @ Paris airshow 2017

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254253[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254254[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2177055
    alexz
    Participant

    JL-10 production line

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254250[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254251[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254252[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2179587
    alexz
    Participant

    So the reality remains that the Gripen E is still an expensive low performance alternative to a brand new F-16 or F/A-18.

    So most of its advertised performance cannot be performed at the same time. Supercruise only when it is very cold and lightly loaded. Full weapons load only with very low fuel quantity. Full fuel only when lightly loaded with weapons. So it is much better just to get a new F-16 rather than something like this.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2127829
    alexz
    Participant

    Thai gripens are new build airframes (as per all other gripen C/D) with hardwares (engines, radars, ejection seats etc.) canibalised from retired Gripen A/B. Bulgarian C/D offer should be similar. Used C/D from current Swedish stocks would only be offered after the E/F enters service (they wanted to canibalise the C/D for their E/F too, but realised only a few systems can be taken for the E/F (ejection seats, small parts), and those C/D is more valuable to be sold as an operational aircraft rather than canibalised like those A/B airframes)

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2128511
    alexz
    Participant

    Manpower cost?

    Those indonesian f-16 are refurbished and upgraded by USAF in Ogden AFB, and i dont think america pay their servicemen there in rupiah…

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2128612
    alexz
    Participant

    http://www.upi.com/Defense-News/2017/03/22/US-Air-Force-delivers-refurbished-F-16s-to-Indonesia/2601490195604/

    They are given quite an extensive refurbishment, including new wings. The airframes are given free of charge to indonesia, so the costs is only for the refurbishment/upgrades.

    But the question is how come those 8 quoted for bulgaria comes out more expensive than the 24 for indonesia. If 1/2 of the cost is for the airframes, it cant be something like euro 40 million for each used one.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2128934
    alexz
    Participant

    How did for almost similar cost Indonesia could manage to get 24 used F-16s, while Bulgaria is only offered 8?

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2136482
    alexz
    Participant

    Argentina emerges as potential L-159 customer

    Aero restarts L-159 ALCA production, touts Argentina as potential customer

    There is little performance benefit of the L-159 compared to argentina’s own ia-63 pampa. Better to go for L-15 or FA-50 imo.

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2140003
    alexz
    Participant

    From the Belgian Air Combat Capability document

    “” Level of Ambition
    The level of ambition for the future Belgian air combat capability is to be able to
    simultaneously
    – guarantee Quick Reaction Alert (QRA) / Air Policing duties with 2 aircraft (24/7) – in an
    alternating rotation regime with the Royal Netherlands Air Force
    and
    – contribute air power to expeditionary operations for a sustained period of undetermined
    duration with 6 multi-role aircraft. “”

    Could the 2 level of ambition be satisfied by different aircrafts?

    Probably for the QRA a low cost supersonic aircraft that could also double as a LIFT. Partial replacement of F-16 and alpha jet missions. 2 squadron of 16 aircrafts perhaps? Something from the T-X competition, Gripen C/D or the KAI golden eagles?

    For the expeditionary operations a common fighter with the allies (F-35?). 6 aircraft deployed would need a minimum fleet of 18 of such fighters?

    Would this be a more cost effective route rather than a homogeneous new fighter fleet of 34 aircraft?

    in reply to: Future of Belgian Air Component #2140548
    alexz
    Participant

    Those scenarios in annex c are quite demanding.

    The question now is, what is the minimum number of airframes that is needed to maintain the operational availability of the 4 required? With just 1 type, those same airframes are also needed to develop the pilots flying experience and skills without a second type as a stepping stone to build flight experince. Then there is all the peacetime missions that is needed to be done, like QRA and air policing. Would those kind of missions can be done with a second cheaper type, while acting as a place for pilots to hone their skills and experience before moving to the more expensive to operate main fighter type?

    in reply to: Strange Air Forces: Royal Malaysian Air Force #2141472
    alexz
    Participant

    Because the F-35A is only offered to a group of nations that are allied (or pretty much alligned) with the USA, and at least for now, delivering that particular aircraft to an airforce who happens to work with some chaps called “Sukhoi” is a big “no-no”?

    Cheers

    That airforce belongs to a country that is currntly having a very frosty relation to the country those “sukhoi” chaps are from due to its airline shot down over Ukraine remember?

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 276 total)