dark light

MP703

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 136 through 147 (of 147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Something Swedish? #1397447
    MP703
    Participant

    Nice pictures, thanks for posting!

    BTW, I think I read somewhere that the Swedish Air Force museum will expand with a third display hall in 2007. Does anyone know for sure?

    in reply to: Number of Blackburn Ripons in existence? #1415813
    MP703
    Participant

    As far as I know the Ripon and Baffin were the same aircraft more or less. Royal Navy Ripons were equipped with Napier Lion inline engines and Finnish Air Force Ripons were equipped with radial engines. The Baffin was basically a Ripon with a radial Pegasus engine.

    in reply to: British aircraft with RR Ghost? #1426891
    MP703
    Participant

    What about the de Havilland Venom, whose production totalled 1,143 aircraft including 742 RAF Venoms and 295 Sea Venoms?

    You are of course true, I didn´t make this “rumour” up however. Still the Venom wouldn´t stand much chance against the MIG-15,NA Sabre or the Ghost powered SAAB 29 or am I wrong? I guess my question really is why did RAF choose the Sabre instead of a Bristish product?

    in reply to: Fairey Firefly to Denmark? #1344508
    MP703
    Participant

    It appears that the Firefly is not owned by the museum, at least not yet. If you check the other aircraft in the collection you´ll see that many aircraft are borrowded from other museums.

    in reply to: Fairey Firefly to Denmark? #1348746
    MP703
    Participant

    I believe that the Firefly Mk.1 SE-CAW is under restoration in Sweden. It is owned by the Swedish air force museum but, maybe they will loan it for some years?

    in reply to: Airworthy Spits? #1371403
    MP703
    Participant

    Famous is of course a better way to describe it, sorry about that. I still don´t understand the interest in this particular aircraft, when there are so many other Spitfires around (especially MkIXs)…

    in reply to: Airworthy Spits? #1371615
    MP703
    Participant

    A bit off topic, but what is so special about MH434 really? Why is it so notorious?

    in reply to: Duxford Bolingbroke #1414696
    MP703
    Participant

    As far as I know the Finnish example was built under license in Finland. Were there any differences between British and Finnish built Blenheims? I know the Finnish Blenheims could be equipped with skis.

    in reply to: Duxford Bolingbroke #1414886
    MP703
    Participant

    Maybe a stupid question but, what is the difference between a Blenheim and a Bolingbroke?

    in reply to: Swedish Osprey SE-AYR #1342415
    MP703
    Participant

    Alex,

    Yes, that´s the one. I guess you could try to ask the forum at http://www.sff.n.se. Maybe you will have better luck there?

    HTH
    Martin

    in reply to: Swedish Osprey SE-AYR #1343312
    MP703
    Participant

    Alex,

    As far as I know the wreck was recovered in 1985 and is currently stored pending rebuild in the near future. Have you tried to contact the SAF museum? BTW there´s been a book written on the subject.

    HTH

    in reply to: Originality of restored aircraft #1359680
    MP703
    Participant

    Don´t get me wrong, I think it´s great that these aircraft are being restored and I admire the work restorers put into it. But when they call an aircraft with only a minor percentage of original parts for “2542” then I think it´s wrong.

    This way you could theoretically clone a dozen of Hurricanes out of a single wreck and all call them “R4118”. I know it doesn´t matter that much, but I just think it´s a little bit deceiving that´s all.

Viewing 12 posts - 136 through 147 (of 147 total)