dark light

MP703

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What If????? #2502278
    MP703
    Participant

    You mean like this?

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/f35_technology_weapons.jpg

    I never thought of that! With munitions under the wings the F-35 isn´t even stealthy. Without stealth and supercruise it´s not even a 4,5 gen fighter but more a 4th gen fighter! 😮

    BTW, the internal payload (which counts) isn´t that impressive.

    in reply to: UGLIEST PLANES?!?! #2502304
    MP703
    Participant

    Avro Canada CF-101…

    Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck, the CF-101 was the Canadian Voodoo.

    Thanks, it is corrected now. Sorry but, the Canuck is Canada´s proud contribution to the list 😉

    in reply to: What If????? #2502553
    MP703
    Participant

    Technically Typhoon, Rafale, Gripen belong in a 4.5 Gen category, better than 4 Gen, not quite 5 Gen F22 standard. Its just nit picking.

    The F-35 isn´t quite F-22 standard either since it can´t supercruise. I read somewhere that Lockheed Martin defined supercruise as necessary for a 5th generation fighter. Does that make the F-35 a 4,5 gen or let´s say a 4,9 gen fighter? :confused:

    in reply to: UGLIEST PLANES?!?! #2502562
    MP703
    Participant

    Here are some types which haven´t been mentioned so far…

    Avro Canada CF-100 Canuck
    F-35 Lightning II
    F-84 (especially with straight wings)
    F-89 Scorpion
    F-101 Voodoo
    Gloster Javelin
    SAAB 29 Tunnan
    Sud Aviation Vatour
    Supermarine Swift

    in reply to: Indian Air Forces – News & Discussion Part VI #2502830
    MP703
    Participant

    Bangalore : The induction of first squadron of the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) to Indian Air Force (IAF) can take place by the end of 2010 or the beginning of 2011 with regular persuasion and monitoring of the LCA programme, the Air Chief Marshal Fali Homi Major said.

    The Chief of Air Staff during his farewell visit to Aeronautical Development Agency recently said: “IAF is on the transformation stage in the matter of gaining overall capabilities, with the help of organisations such as DRDO, ADA, HAL and other partners.”

    An official release said that the Chief of Air Staff was affirmative that the ongoing LCA programme would further lead to LCA mark II, MCA and many other projects of self- reliance nature by sprinkling lot of patriotism around.

    If this is true, it is fantastic new for the LCA. I assume that the article is referring to the batch of 20 LCAs which has been ordered?

    WONT HAPPEN 🙂

    Well, time will tell.

    in reply to: What would you do to improve Eurocanards exports? #2504060
    MP703
    Participant

    The Gripen NG may take all this, but it still isn’t a heavyweight. Just like the Mirage2000 wasn’t Mirage4000 and the F16 was never F15.

    The F35 has Aesa, HMD, IRST. So does the F22. Is the F35 the F22?

    Ok, I get your point. But I think that is the biggest problem with the Rafale and Typhoon from an export point of view. Dassault had fantastic export success with the Mirage series of light fighters. Then they decided to go heavy with the Rafale and so far it hasn´t been as successful as the predecessor M2K and probably never will. The same goes for the British I think. They used to have geat success with types like the Vampire and the Hunter. Light and affordable planes that most countries could operate. Then they made the heavy Lightning and the Tonka which never became as successful in terms of export. Now, they got the Typhoon will probably follow the same path for the same reason IMHO.

    The reason why “heavies” like Typhoon and Rafale never will become great export successes is not because they are bad aircraft but because the concept is “wrong”.

    in reply to: What would you do to improve Eurocanards exports? #2504067
    MP703
    Participant

    In the Aesa sector, everyone is doing better than the Typhoon… Swedes, French, Americans… I am sure that even the static array would be welcome enough for the potential customers that do value the presence of Aesa.

    How does this fact make the Typhoon a “Mercedes”?

    Simply, the user that doesn’t want the IRST, or the AESA or the OSF NG or DASS, most likely doesn’t want to buy “Mercedes” in the first place! He is looking for F16 or Gripen. The ones that could buy a “Mercedes” are those that want the leather seats and electric mirrors, and so, want IRST, HMD, AESA , etc.

    I thought the Gripen NG would get IRST, HMD, AESA etc. Maybe I´m wrong?

    in reply to: Swedish P-51D restoration #1172430
    MP703
    Participant

    I checked the website of the Swedish Air Force museum and this individual is listed there, so it appears to be owned by that museum. The Swedish registration number of this S26 was 26084. According to my sources, the US serial number of this P-51D was 44-72112 and it was delivered on January 20th 1945.

    BTW, apparently the Swedish Air Force museum is closed until June 2010!

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2447320
    MP703
    Participant

    Like pointed out before by some one else. The Tejas delays are the main reason for the MRCA competition.

    With “arrengements” like this the LCA doesn´t seem that inexpensive any more. I believe the real cost of this project is a well kept secret. 🙁

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2451618
    MP703
    Participant

    Like pointed out before by some one else. The Tejas delays are the main reason for the MRCA competition.

    With “arrengements” like this the LCA doesn´t seem that inexpensive any more. I believe the real cost of this project is a well kept secret. 🙁

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2447349
    MP703
    Participant

    I’m not quite sure that you are joking but I assume you are!

    I think it´s clear that the comments of PLA-MKII mostly are ironic. I actually think he´s amusing. 😉

    in reply to: Tejas as an M.R.C.A. contender #2451638
    MP703
    Participant

    I’m not quite sure that you are joking but I assume you are!

    I think it´s clear that the comments of PLA-MKII mostly are ironic. I actually think he´s amusing. 😉

    in reply to: The end of the LCA??? #2462268
    MP703
    Participant

    What is the status of the Kaveri by the way? With plans about maybe equipping the LCA with GE414 or Eurojet, does that mean the Kaveri is dead? Or is the Kaveri going to equipp a Mk.3 which is entering service in, let´s say 2030? :rolleyes: Either way I am sure that it will take years for HAL to even decide which engine to equipp the Mk.2. Why is it called Mk.2 by the way? Was there a Mk.1? :confused:

    in reply to: The end of the LCA??? #2467699
    MP703
    Participant

    A development time of ~30 years? Seriously, did this happen before in the history of aviation? On the other hand you must admire the dedication -any other nation would have dropped the project a long time ago.

    in reply to: The end of the LCA??? #2471969
    MP703
    Participant

    India has turned the corner on this program. There is no way that this program will (or should) be cut.

    When this is the strongest argument for continuing the program you know it is over 🙁

    Author is missing something More then 80 Lca as been ordered from the first batch it self and more then 60 GE engines are already delivered to India and the delivery will start from 2011 and by the time MK2 is ready by 2013 and will enter production by 2015

    No offense I think you used to be quite sure that the Tejas would enter service in 2010? The year of IOC is only a matter of guessing from now on.

    I don’t think you understand how India works…………..its not being cancelled. Just left to die………..

    I agree, too much prestige involved. :rolleyes: I believe the Indians are now trying to figure out how to end the program without loosing to much face. The LCA will probably continue to serve as a test platform and at airshows, but not in air force service.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 147 total)