dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Raptor 4003 damaged by wake turbulences #2617780
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I would have thought that with Stealth being the key to the success of the Raptor, conformal tanks would have been more preferable than drop tanks like those, maybe I’m wrong in think this but it seems to me like the USAF aren’t quite sure what they want with this machine.

    in reply to: South Africa buys A400M #2617791
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    It sure is a nice plane, wonder if the RAAF are going to opt for this for their Strategic Lift capability.

    How many countries are now on board for this project?

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2617792
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    A small fleet of P-99’s would serve the country well IMHO, though I still think that they should also have an AAM capability as well.

    Gaz: Has the RNZAF started looking at what to replace the Orions with? They like our AP-3C’s really don’t have that long to go before they need to be replaced, say 10-15 years.

    in reply to: INTERESTING SHIPS #2054315
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    That’s it mate, just look at that bow, you get that ship in a storm and you’d be looking at a sub rather than a ship!

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2618150
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Maybe NZ can settle an agreement with Austrilia stateing that RAAF is to protect NZ skies. Very cheap. I don’t think Australia would mind.

    Why would we want to send our force over there? A. We really don’t have enough for ourselves let alone enough to help them, our P.M. is only too happy to jump to the call of GWB than Helen Clarke who is our neighbour. Personally I think that since Clarke and Howard got into power in their respective countries, relations between the two countries have soured a little, especially with the loss of Ansett. B. Again Back to GWB, howard would rather send Hornets and Tankers to Kazahkstan to bomb Iraq on some silly war with no purpose other than to control the worlds oil and appease GHB than protect a close and good ally whom we’ve been in battle with most of our two countries short lives!

    I think that additional P-3s would be more useful than fighters. NZ has an important EEZ to survey and a fleet of orions armed with harpoon, maverick, SLAM-ER is a credible dissuasion force.

    A good thought but the orions are both starting to get on and are loosing some of their capabilities in upgrades. Personally I’d like to see the full capability restored to the Orions as well as developing a capability for firing AAM’s as a self protection matter.

    Just face it: any enemy that can bring an offensive force all the way to New Zealand which the RNZAF has to fight, is an enemy way stronger than New Zealand can afford fighting.

    So China’s Blue Water build up is really no need for concern? And what if they finally put to sea with a carrier that suprises everyone who thinks they don’t have one? Memories of the Yamato class spring tio mind here, covered building preventing pics from being taken, never seen before security to protect any info leeks. OK China might not have one, but who’s to say that can’t build one without anyone knowing?

    Combat jets in the New Zealand military are as useful as arctic mountain commandos in the Egyptian military.

    Even the best military planers account for everything, you of all people should know that mate!

    Ms Clarke gets to fly to “important” meetings in one of the two 757’s, can’t forget that….

    Yeah and don’t forget, flying in the navy helos as well, look on the RNZN website for those pics. IMHO she’s a little kid who can’t stop playing with her toys.

    But anyone that can attempt to invade New Zealand will not be deterred by a handful of F-16’s.

    A hand full of what ever is better than nothing at all.

    in reply to: INTERESTING SHIPS #2054365
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I always thought that Dreadnaught looking proposal for the new British Destroyer program looked cool, though with a bow that sloped down it would have been better as a sub design.

    in reply to: INTERESTING SHIPS #2054731
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Steve: yeah mate sorry about that, guess I should get some sleep someday!

    in reply to: Will the Kiwi's ever have an airforce again? #2619804
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Gaz: Mate you know I mean no disrespect, I still find it hard to believe that the people of Aotaeoroa think they don’t need an airforce.

    Sure they may have sat around doing nothing, but wouldn’t that reflect on the government as them not using the Airforce properly? Apart from popibng over here, how many excercises in other countries did they perform in? I happen to know for a fact that Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia often sent invitations to the RNZAF to participate in their major exercises.

    IMHO Clake has done more harm to New Zealand than Prince Charles’ marriage to Carmella has done to the royal family.

    in reply to: INTERESTING SHIPS #2054755
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Here are some of the design consepts for the CVNX77 project. This design was to be a merging of the Improved Nimitz class and new technologies. Some of these designs don’t even have some semblance to the Nimitz class.

    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Since war took to the air there have been many differeing accounts by either side as to who shot what down.

    During WWII the British ministry became so worried about losses (mainly of their own planes to friendly fire), that they started installing cameras into the planes so that pilots had a better chance to review their kills and see what mistakes were made.

    These days with BVR missiles and improvements to planes such as thrust vectoring, it’s harder to see kills on camera, unless you get in close. Some weapons do have cameras installed. But as well all know, planes these days have transponders letting everyone know who they are and where they are. These days it’s hard to make a false claim. especially with AWACS watching the skies as the US has everywhere they go. Some transponders do go faulty, and horrific accidents happen (as was the case in Op Desert Storm with the downing of Blackhawks being thought they were Iraqi Hinds), That’s why we have ROE’s and why pilots stick to them.

    in reply to: South Korea – ROKAF. Photo Achieve #2620133
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Many appoligies, I do realise that this is a thread about Korea, but are there any pics out there of the TNI-AU’s KT-1 Woong-Bees? I haven’t seen any.

    in reply to: Fanatsy Show Team #2620137
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Sahdow1: Mate what’s your team called?

    PII: mate you aren’t being very imaginative are you? Ever thought of a team of QF-4’s? Think about it, no one would get hurt if they crashed 😉 Besides they would be the first UAV display team 😉 you could even call them the Drones 😉

    Lightndattic: Mate the Snowbirds are a wonderful team, but what’s going to happen when they have to retire their mounts? Have they selected another bird yet to display in?

    in reply to: USS Sea Shadow #2054810
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Ok mate guess I can provide some insite here.

    1. Sea Shadow was retired a few years ago, she did a trip down here to Australia, I remember seeing her on the news coming into Sydney Harbour. Not long after that they retired her. I did hear however, that she was coming out of retirement for another series of tests, but I think they finished those. One thing is certain, she’ll never be scrapped, she is too valuable for scrapping.

    2. As for that Bond flick ship, no that was never real, they modeled it on Sea Shadow but it was bigger (well supposedly).

    in reply to: INTERESTING SHIPS #2054813
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Here’s an interesting design of the 80’s, the RAN’s Bay class inshore minesweepers. HMAS Rushcutter and Shoalwater were officially retired last year, they had been in reserve storage for 5 years. They have now been sold as pleasure craft. What is more interesting is the fact that both vessels varried in their design! I have a framed pic of Shoalwater, but there is nothing on the net that I can find, but here’s a pic of Rushcutter.

    HMAS Rushcutter (M80)
    http://www.austehc.unimelb.edu.au/tia/images/bxtai0527t.jpg

    in reply to: INTERESTING SHIPS #2054831
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Kovy: Mate if you ask me, I think that design should have won the comp, it was far superior and included a lift inside the structure for a/c. Very James Bond style 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 3,659 total)