I never really envisioned just how big Indy was going to be, Dang it’s big, far bigger than Freedom!
Ahhhhh the Halifax class, I love those ships. The remind me of the Mk-4 Panzers of WWII, Squat things that are hard to hit and carry enough power to knock out just about anything taking them on.
I know it’s a tough call mate, but do you happen to have any pics of the flight control station?
Great pics though, thanks for sharing.
“How much is a 30 cent Icecream?” Now that’s a classic or at MacDonalds they ask you if you whant fries with your meal deal.
Yes stupid questions are out there, but this is not one of them, it’s actually very good considering the current tech level where they pop the ship in and spray it all over in a week.
Which is great, safe for the fact that LR artillery is not exactly a hot market nowadays.
Not exactly true mate, Land 17 here in Australia is looking at the new version of the G-8 with their longer ranged artillery rounds. This is the Armys favourite for the competition but the government hasn’t made up it’s mind yet. Back in March when I was down in Avalon, they had a PzH-2000 of the Dutch army over, this is one of the contenders (Dutch are offering us 18 of their new Pinzgauer’s which are surplus to their needs in a trade deal for more Dingo Armoured Combat Vehicules).
There is a market out there for SPG’s and Mobile Artillery Systems, it’s just not as big or relevant (on this forum) as Fighters.
Amen Jonsey
There were a few pics posted around at the time of the incident.

In the above pic, you can clearly see the damage just below the aft of the hanger at the waterline. Had the missile had a bigger charge or more missiles used in the attack, I doubt Hanit would be afloat today and I doubt Hezbolah would be around as a group following that.
This is what happens when you under estimate an Enemies capabilities. Israel thought that the navy would never be attacked because they are off shore. I can tell you now that they’ll never make that mistake again. As a result, the IDF/N have increased spending to cover more training and expansion of the fleet.
Well the Airliners net is there to protect the picture from being stolen- if you want a copy of this pic without it, you have to buy it.
It’s kind of hard to tell but does this version have a different dorsal fin? It looks rounded at the front which is different to the bomber versions which go straight down. The other two differences I can see are the bulged fairing on the intake just above the wing joint and an odd looking panel unst under the R of the watermark. Oh and there is a dome on top of the frame (Sat Coms?).
I wasn’t aware that they had finalised a design- I know they’ve cut the first steel though and that Italy’s Fincanterri was supposed to be helping them with the design which started looking like a Frankenstein version of the Cavor, Kuznetsov and the Mistral LHD (island structure).
Well they are probably right because if you look at the currencies used, i said Aussie Dollars and you said Kiwi Dollars, with the current exchange rate hovering around $1.14 Kiwi to $1 Aussie it sort of makes sence mate
CEA FAR and CEA Moutns have been quoted in Aussie dollars as under $1M and are being fitted to all 10 of the Anzac class, though the Kiwi’s are asking for time on theirs and will actually be the last ones to receive it.
Trials were conducted on HMAS Arunta with smaller systems during the development phase of the product and they proved so successfull that the American’s and a few other navies are looking at buying them as well. This info came from the CEA reps at the Airshow at Avalon.
The systems are boasting a better and cheaper performance over the more complex systems such as Aegis which have capabilities that most of the navies in the world would not require (AMBD being the fore most in my mind there).
It’s always important to give the maximum amout of training to any defence personal that can be provided, these days with the global threat of terrorism mounting (Hezbollah’s attack on the IDF/N’s Ellat class vessel not long ago proving my point here).
It’s good to have a live fire excercise where you can actually bang something up. We do it every now and then down here, if we don’t have a vessel spare (the last one was the former HMAS Swan), then we buy one from the vast USN stocks (like the Belknap class we sunk a couple of years ago) or we sink Drug ships like the Pong Su from North Korea (what a birthday present that was for me last year hehehehehe).
It’s also a way of testing both weapons intergration and human intergration of systems to see if there is any improvments needed on your training sylabus. Sure the target doesn’t act the same as one that would if it were manned but the training is valuable none the less. Good on Canada for keeping up the standards!
Personally I don’t see a problem with this “Co-operative Agreement”. We have a similar agreement with our kiwi brothers across the Tasman down here. Sure they have a Navy of their own and aren’t completely defenceless, but then again if you look at Icelands Coast Guard, you’ll find that they aren’t completly defenceless either.
I did a bit of research earlier this year into the Icelandic defence situation and I came up with some rather interesting finds: one of the Icelandic ships was sunk during the Cod Wars after it deliberatly rammed an RN vessel that was on patrol in the disputed area. The RN paid for another ship out of courtsey but the war went on for a long time.
I believe that Norway should recruit from Iceland if they are going to have this joint co-operation deal, Iceland does have a fair bit of money to splash about in reality what with Japanese bribe money to support Whaling (something which both Iceland and Norway do anyway). Iceland could afford to fund 10% of the budget let alone a token contribution of 5%. Now if this happened then Norway would be able to get it’s full 48 F-35’s and posibly base a sqdn on Iceland in a rotational sence similar to what we used to do with Malaysia (RAAF Butterworth). I feel that it’s only right that if Norway operates in the Icelandic area then Iceland should contribute extra man power to help take up the slack- otherwise the Norwegian defence will over stretch itself and have to pull back leaving a nasty feeling between two good friend over something that couldn’t be helped.
As with everything, there are pros and cons for the situation. It just depends on the terms of the agreement struck between the two countries and the pollitical climate that the world lives in today.
The Aussie Tigers are already being delivered, I saw 005 at the Avalon Airshow where is flew displays and was on static as well. 006 has also been delivered and IIRC thay are delivering one every two months, but I’ll get that confirmed.
Did a biyt more digging around, hope this helps you guys…
Hmmm from all that I have reasd it seems that it is an advanced copy (or at least a reversed engineered and updated copy) of the Alvand Corvette of which there are a few pics around.
One site (linked below) has reference to an advanced AK-176 76mm gun coupled with 8x SS-N-22’s. Conversly there is a second design that has a 100mm gun with 8x C-803’s and both have different radars.
Incidently this thread also ties in with the other Iranian thread we have here.