dark light

Ja Worsley

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 3,659 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Splinter Camo Question #2525478
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Flex: nice mate but I don’t think that is what they are talking about. Can you give me the story about this one?

    EMGY: mate the Black and gold in very nice on the Viggen, and suites it perfectly, thanks.

    in reply to: My first international article #2067464
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Pred: sorry it’s taken me a bit to get back to you mate, been busy with a play that we recently had on.

    Anyway I did a bit of digging around and you’re right, they have removed the decommissioning dates from the website. I will get back to you on these, but in the Patrol boat section of the RAN website they have the two types listed, those Fremantle class that are still in service are still on the list on the right of the page, if you go into each section and look at the “Ships news” section you might find the relevant info there, but HMAS Dubbo is still active, I saw that last week!

    in reply to: RN 801sqdn – the video #2067474
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    How do I enlist in the RN? they have some really cute women over there, better than the RAN!

    in reply to: Viggen on carriers? Feasible or not? #2067478
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    great movie, anyway back on topic.

    The Viggen needed heaps done if it were to be a carrier a/c. The Main gear while good and strong, actually would need to be widened to take carrier landings which are tougher than landing on an air field (motion of the deck upwards as well as the downward thrust of the plane, I have seen tomcats gear break under these circumstances).

    The position of the hook is also critical, it can not interfear with the exhaust pipe- though with the amazing thrust reverser I doubt you’d need a hook at all. But in any case, if you kept the thrust reverser you can not have it near the hook, the heat would bend it or worse, melt it.

    The Viggen does have one good point about it for use on carriers, it’s tail fin did bend to port, thus lowering the overall height of the plane, and that’s a critical factor on carriers. Still this point can be negated by the fact that it Viggens wing span is so big in area, even if you could fold the wings at the tips, you’d still have a major problem with stowage.

    Then there is the spare parts factor. IIRC from my time on two American carriers, they carry enough parts to basically build four planes from scratch (more in times of war- have to check with Badger on this). I remember seeing fuselage parts in the hanger strung from very odd places (saw a Tomcat get new wings once it was amazing). The Viggen would not be able to have the same ammount of parts available for carrier life. Thus this whole excercise would be useless. Still it’s a nice dream, I’d love to fly one off a carrier!

    in reply to: Red Bull Sea Vixen. No more sponsorship. #1325617
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Crikey mate, choose your title better next time !!!!!

    I agree that topic title brought a lump to my throat, I mean isn’t that the only flying Sea Vixen in the world?

    in reply to: My first international article #2067848
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Thanks for the support guys, I’m really in a rush atm but here are some answers:

    Tid: No I don’t speak Portugese nor Brazilian for that matter(it’s one of the few languages I have yet to master- as Terran can testify), it was an interesting process I went through with this article and any further article I do for these guys- in any case it was a good experience and I’m glad to see everyone enjoyed it.

    Pred: No the last Freo to retire will be at the end of 2007 or begining of 2008 give me the URL for this Gereman article and I will send them a message to correct it. Just refer to tyhe RAN website for the decommissioning dates for the Fleet (Freo’s and FFG’s).

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2067940
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    also is there an indian LPD program

    Last I heard mate the IN was looking at buying three Mistral class LHD’s if that’s of interest. Haven’t heard anything more, but I have an ear to the ground

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2067980
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Thanks for the update Wan, that first pic of the carrier with the guys walking away from her, is it just me or does she actually look rather small in the pic? No I have taken distance into account, look at the scaffolding on the side, one section is just over six foot high in regulation scaf structures, there are a few sections odf scaf there nad if the size is regulation then she is a lot smaller than I have been lead to believe.

    in reply to: Sixteen years ago – where were you? #2530182
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    PII: mate I know the truth about what planes did what work, I am just quoting what was in the papers at the time ok.

    in reply to: News from the Icelandic Coast Guard #2068055
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Interesting I spoke with Hammer last night and he confirmed that this was one of the designs the AdCh were looking at for some sort of duty in their fleet. Guess we’ll have to brush up on our Islenska to find out for sure!

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2068056
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    a few questions about USS Trenton/INS Jalashva LPD on IN service:

    1) what’s the current armament of the USS Trenton/INS Jalashva LPD?

    2) Which helicopters should be used by Indian Navy aboard?

    3) Regarding the Vulcan CIWS, IN usualy operate Russian CIWS like AK-630 and AK-230. Is there any intention to replace the Vulcan CIWS in order to guarantee standarts with others ship’s fleet?

    thanks
    Ayala

    Hey mate, guess I’ll jump in on this one (not that I jump in on the IN threads much)

    1) USS Ternton had 2x 3″ L/50 DP in Mk-33 Twin mounting and 2x 20mm Phalanx CIWS systems, upon transfer I doubt that the CIWS systems would stay but the 3″s might, unless the IN rips them off and puts something usefull in it instead.

    2) The IN has a few Ka-31 Helix helo’s at it’s disposal (more being bought) as well as some naval versions of the Dhurv which are starting to trickle in.

    3) Well this question I basically answered in the first part (they aren’t Vulcan’s- those are used in the Air Force on planes or in the Army on tanks, the correct term for these guns is Phalanx). I would imagine that the IN would use something more standard to their fleet, logistically it makes sence doesn’t it?

    Hope that helps you mate!

    Now for my own questions.

    1) What’s happening with the new Russian Carrier? Is it ready yet?

    2) How is the Mig-29K progressing for IN service? Have any been made yet and if so are any flying yet?

    3) Has the final design been sorted out for the ADS, I mean they have cut the first lot of steel but last I heard they were still deciding on the final details of the ships (I assume that they still are going for 3-4 of these?)

    Thanks guys

    in reply to: News from the Icelandic Coast Guard #2068074
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Fill them in on the rest of the news Terran; you can’t just give them half the news and leave it at that 😉

    Terran and I were talking about this on Messenger, Chile has also signed for these vessels and the design is very similar to those currently being built for the Norwegian Coast Guard

    in reply to: Sixteen years ago – where were you? #2530486
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    I was at a train station waiting for my girl friend (later my wife, then my ex-wife) to come home from work, she was pregnant with our first child and I was reading the paper which had a great pic of Bagdad at night under attack on the front page and a complete booklet inside all about what was planned to happen. They had all the players listed, us on one side and them on the other (I remember thinking to myself back then that Iraq doesn’t stand a chance with so many opposing nations lining up to have a go).

    I remember the inside cover of the lift out, it was all about the planes used on either side and how many were in the mix, odd to think that Iraqs Tu-22 Blinders were what was considered the most dangerous plane in their inventory.

    I also remember the hoohar made about the F-117’s and how analysts were thinking it to be the wonder plane that would swoop in and take out all the Iraqi baddies before the main forces got there, of course the reality was that the F-15’s did most of the work, backed up by the Tornados with F-16’s and M2K’s on CAP.

    I remember reading a few days later that RAAF F/A-18’s had finally been given the go to bomb, everyone down here was cheering- don’t know why, most of the real work was over by then.

    Yes I rememeber.

    in reply to: Gripens for Sale #2530545
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Thought I smelt a pickled herring, hahahahaha get it- something fishy, thanks guys- i’ll go back to hybernating now, it’s too hot down here.

    in reply to: Questions about the RFA #2068192
    Ja Worsley
    Participant

    Mate that is the most help anyone has been able to give me, it is logical makes heaps of sence and is so practicle that if you were a woman sitting next to me I’d kiss you! Thanks a heap.

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 3,659 total)