Plenty of women left in the world, not enough Orcas.

I totally agree. Wildlife always come off worst in the long run when humans are involved – just look at how few tigers and white sharks there are left these days.
Humans are one species we don’t have to worry about… there are always plenty more no matter how many personal and mass tragedies befall us. There are more people alive in India at this very moment, than the entire population of the Earth in the year 1700.
More and more well-known scientists, natural historians, and the so-called ‘elite’ classes are beginning to voice the (once taboo) opinion that the world’s population is spiralling out of control, and will eventually need to be culled, if our food resources are to remain viable.
The common concensus is that 90% will have to be culled, to ensure the future of the rest. Just how they would go about it, they don’t say, but we would also have to do it all again in another 300 years.
Personally, I think that either Eastern or Western genetic scientists will come up with a disease that affects every other human except those of their own genetic makeup, and then they will migrate into the void that’s left…
How’s that for straying off the thread?;)

They can go on ad nauseam about how they are a classless party nowadays, judging people on their own merits instead of who their parents were, but they haven’t changed one iota.
They have gone on record as saying that one of the first things they will do when they get into power is to lift the ban on foxhunting.
I rest my case, m’lud…

She had her chance, and was too stupid to realise it. Let the donated liver go to someone else…

Trouble with being around intelligent large animals like Orcas and Elephants, is that you’ll never know what pissed them off at that particular moment – anybody can have a bad day…

If England shares the revenues from oil and fish exploitation and reaches a final agreement with Argentina.

serious negotiations between both countries, and also by then England accepted to discuss sovereignty on a long term.

Argentina has to offer not only the cease of a military threat (and it’s economic consequences to England) … but also a when Argentina send millions of tons of food to England).

It’s not that I don’t have an argument. it’s because of you lack of knowledge about history…

And can I suggest you improve your knowledge on national boundaries?:rolleyes:

Strategically, it just means less airfields for our jets to divert to, more countries running surveillance on our forces movements, and a greater risk to any special forces who have to mount covert ops in those countries.
But the bottom line is, they don’t have Nukes…

Now it seems the rest of Latin America are supporting the Argentinians…
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article7036764.ece
“International Law?” “We don’t need no stinking International Law!”…

You are 100% correct , as I am when I state that in 80% of the world UK is still referred to as “England”.

How would an Englishman feel if 80% of the world referred to England as ‘France’?
Same thing…;)