dark light

Al

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,560 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Which Avro Lancaster Windows Were Painted Over? #1100020
    Al
    Participant

    Here’s a Lancaster fuselage window which was lying on the surface in an area in Quarrywood, Elgin, which was used to dump WW2 aircraft wreckage from the MUs RAF Lossiemouth and RAF Kinloss. Other bits lying round were Lancaster parts, beyond doubt.
    As you can see, the outer surface has been painted over completely with dark earth/dark green camo – maybe the sprayer used the window as a demarcation marker.
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/Lanc1.jpg?t=1266858506
    Underneath this camo paint is a layer of night black paint. It’s definitely on the outside, as the only paint on the inside surface is primer green.
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/Lanc2.jpg?t=1266858941
    Hope that helps…

    in reply to: Scrapyard Photos; Any More? #1099436
    Al
    Participant

    Is your unknown fuselage chunk a Sea Baliol?
    John

    You’re right! Here’s a photo of a Sea Balliol rotated and cropped roughly in the same orientation, and it’s a match – that scoop for the tyre should have been a giveaway!
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/Seaballiol.jpg?t=1266881695
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/BrumleyBraeUnknown.jpg?t=1266881760

    in reply to: Buried Lancasters.(2004 thread) #1098889
    Al
    Participant

    Paul / anyone?
    I would certainly be interested in knowing if any Lincoln bomb aimers nose glazing sections are remaining at the RAF Kinloss site
    regards
    Mark Pilkington

    I doubt if anything much remains now Mark – here are some public domain photos to illustrate the situation. I’ve marked on the 1946 RAF recce photo where the 2009 photo corresponds – showing just how much the area has been cleaned up and flattened since even 1983…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/KinWW2-1.jpg?t=1266933389
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/Kin2009.jpg?t=1266933637

    in reply to: Some aircraft wrecks around Moray, Scotland #1098231
    Al
    Participant

    It looks remarkably undamaged from a crash – if it was in a crash at all. My guess is that this particular component originated from scrapping, which may explain the absence of any reported Lanc crash from that area.
    Anon.

    Though I can’t quite picture why a farmer would bother to move them at least ten miles from any scrapman, lug them all up a single track road to the top of a steep hill, and then forget about them for forty years, unless he wanted a firewall for his combine harvester…

    in reply to: Some aircraft wrecks around Moray, Scotland #1097072
    Al
    Participant

    I recall the visit to the Lanc engine bearers and I never did find a reference to a crash in that area. I wonder if any readers here have any idea?

    Gary – I seem to remembr you had heard from a local that it had crashed/forced landed nearby in some sort of ravine or valley? Can you recall how many firewalls were there?

    QUOTE=Anon
    27 years ago is the early eighties. As far as I am concerned, this doesn’t seen very long ago at all, hence the comment.
    Anon.
    I agree – it doesn’t seem all that long ago, but when you think of it, going back another 26 years from when I took the photo, the Lanc was still very much in service with the RCAF, and had only just retired from the RAF!

    in reply to: Which Avro Lancaster Windows Were Painted Over? #1096756
    Al
    Participant

    I can remember quite a lot of circular bundles of cables (perhaps old control cables?) just under the ground at Quarrywood, so they are there. Quite a thickness of expansive pine branches/foliage were dumped on the site before the topsoil, so that would have to be cleared up too.
    To me, the very real potential of a veritable treasure trove of rare WW2 parts under the surface far outweighs the dangers involved. I for one would be quite happy to sign any indemnity waver to be able to take part in a dig.
    As you say Gary, there are lots of empty quarries in the same wood which are 100 feet deep, and I firmly believe this one has been nearly filled with 45 MU’s scrap.

    in reply to: Some aircraft wrecks around Moray, Scotland #1096611
    Al
    Participant

    The beaches of the Moray coastline are strewn with WW2 and post-war aircraft parts, especially after a storm tide. With so many WW2 RAF training bases around, it’s not surprising, considering how many Whitleys, Wellingtons, Beaufighters, Mosquitos, Defiants etc have crashed a short distance out to sea over the years, not to mention all the Gannets, Buccaneers, and even Jaguars!
    The most likely areas to find relics are Findhorn beach, and Lossiemouth west beach, both just north of Kinloss and Lossiemouth airfields respectively.
    I once even found WW1 ammunition (rifle and pistol bullets, artillery shells) in a large hessian sack on Culbin north beach, and reported it to the Forres police, who couldn’t have cared less.
    When I first had a nose around the Warwick wreck in the 1980s, the area was littered with damaged (but intact) .303 rounds, and more disturbingly, scraps of blue uniform material…

    in reply to: Some aircraft wrecks around Moray, Scotland #1096658
    Al
    Participant

    There is still an ident to find for the Wellington on Lossie beach and I would like to go back for a good dig around at low tide.

    Gary – I found this hook on Lossie west beach at low tide (more or less on the runway 23 centreline) probably in the early 1980s. Definitely from an aircraft, the hook is stainless steel, the clamp is alloy, and the bolts steel. The hook looks the same as found on a parachute harness.
    Around the same time, I scuba dived on a Mosquito around the Halliman Skerries – lots of engine parts, and large caliber ammunition…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/LossieHook.jpg?t=1267091645

    in reply to: Which Avro Lancaster Windows Were Painted Over? #1096039
    Al
    Participant

    That window is a fantastic find! Any other items?

    Peter – I’m sure my wife has ‘tidied’ a lot of my stuff into the bin, but I did find this while rummaging around today – also from the surface of Quarrywood. It’s made of clear plastic (or thick acetate), with a black painted underside…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/AmmunitionPlate.jpg?t=1267123496

    in reply to: Anyone Able To Id A/c type WW2 ? #1093875
    Al
    Participant

    Been fooling around with the image’s size, contrast, sharpness etc, but it doesn’t really have any new information to go on. Looks like the tail has a twin rudder – I’d go for a Miles Messenger…
    http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm14/handshifterAl/CAP1.jpg?t=1267345523

    in reply to: General Discussion #279692
    Al
    Participant

    As expected in this forum, most of the replies to this thread are littered with sneering contemptuous one-liners, intended as racial put-downs, which is one of the reasons we want independence. Some of you can’t even spell Scotland, yet deign to pass comment.
    And it’s OK to do this, because a moderator is one of the guilty.
    Reading these replies, you’d think that all Britain’s wealth, gold reserves, armed forces materiel, and other national assets were purely under English ownership. Not true – Scotland has paid it’s fair share of taxes for hundreds of years, so is due that percentage of the assets as her own – although putting a blow torch to the crown jewels might be a step too far.
    Anyone who thinks Scotland can’t become a thriving, prosperous nation is deluded. Having similar populations of around five million, we are directly comparable to countries like Norway and Denmark, who have been recently voted two of the happiest nations on Earth. Norway, in particular, is the fourth wealthiest nation in the world, according to Forbes, simply due to oil production. It’s population pay high taxes, but they don’t actually mind, because they know they are being well served, and that the money is spent making their lives and surroundings very pleasant.
    International law is quite strict about territorial waters, and has robust guidelines for the definition of national boundaries. A whopping 98% of the oil fields (and future oil fields) would be in Scottish waters – and even the 6000 square miles of southern North Sea which Tony Blair and the treacherous Donald Dewar annexed and redrew for England in 1999 would have to be given back. It’s the law, you see.
    While current oil fields are beginning to decrease in production, it’s estimated that there is far more oil still there than has been taken out – it’s just more inaccessible, and will take 21st technology to retrieve, but the main point is that it is there, like having money in the bank.
    But it’s not all about money – we are a totally different people, having to live with decisions of whatever Westminster party comes to power. Tory Party policies in particular are a complete anathema to most Scots – we view their outdated (but alive!) class system, and feudal money-grabbing private ownership of everything with complete disdain. It’s obscene to spend so much money on things like Trident, when the National Health Service is in such poor shape, and our own elderly and poor are written off. All because ‘Great’ Britain wants to sit at the top table!
    To me, independence is an incredible chance to get things right, to rid ourselves of successive governments who simply look on the mass of tax-payers as a money cow to be cynically milked, to emerge as a caring society where people, not status or power, comes first. It is possible, too – just ask the Danes and Norwegians!
    And all these so funny remarks about Alex Salmond and his deputy – GROW UP! He is one of the most able politicians of our generation, which is why the ‘No’ campaign, and Cameron in particular, are petrified to take him on. Salmond and the SNP have done far more for Scotland in the few years they have been in power than Westminster has done in centuries.
    And it would be a mistake to think that Alex Salmond doesn’t know exactly what he is doing – do you really think that keeping the same currency (and Royal Family come to that) is the long-term plan? Every move he makes, or doesn’t make, is carefully planned to show up and side-step ‘Perfidious Albion’.

    in reply to: General Discussion #279584
    Al
    Participant

    …much more arrogance than the idea that you can walk away from the Union and do better on you’re own solely on the basis of resources that were once shared.

    Or the arrogance of the Tories squandering those shared resources during the Thatcher era by using the bulk of the generated wealth to totally remodel run-down London and the south east of England? Yeah, that made everyone else in the UK glow with pride…

    in reply to: General Discussion #279595
    Al
    Participant

    And Salmond so entirely epitomises the breed.

    Is that breed as in ‘half breed’? Are you aware of how zenophobic and ‘master race’ that sounds?

    in reply to: General Discussion #279599
    Al
    Participant

    I’ve checked quickly through the whole thread and can’t see a mis-spelling of ‘Scotland’ anywhere
    Moggy

    See post #55 before it’s deleted, changed, etc…

    Al’s long post exemplifies the hypersensitive, tetchy response typical, in my fairly extensive experience North of the Border, to any criticism of their cause or of the Great Leader.

    Hypersensitive and tetchy? Independence for Scotland will be THE greatest change in the UK since the Union – isn’t it a subject worth being serious about?

    Sadly Al and many I know like him have fallen for Salmond’s rhetoric and bluster.

    We have fallen for no rhetoric or bluster – just made up our own minds. In my case, I’ve been for independence and the SNP since the early 1970s, and to me Alex Salmond just personifies the cause, and the solution.

    I have a simple question for Al. Do you agree that anyone’s citizenship should be allowed to be changed without that person having a say?

    I’m sure you’ll have the choice of citizenship either way, if you are a Scot living in England, or English living in Scotland. If you want to be a British citizen, then stay in the remaining part of the UK.

    So you’re quite happy with the SNP’s oil grab?.

    That’s like saying I lent you a perfectly good car, now you’ve let it run out of petrol, and you’re miffed I want it back. Those were Scottish waters before the Union, and will be afterwards.

    In a few words

    1) A solution to the West Lothian issue

    2) The unlikelihood of the Labour Party ever gaining control of the Westminster parliament and hence the economy ever again
    So Moggy – you’re quite happy with the thought that the Tories will be perpetually in power?

    3) It relieves the rest of the UK of all liabilities for the two major, and faltering banks.
    Why would the UK be relieved? They may have ‘Scotland’ in their names, and are based there, but in reality they are very little to do with us anymore – 80% of the Royal Bank of Scotland is owned by the UK government, and the Bank of Scotland, HBOS, was taken over by Lloyds.

    4) Whilst currently subsidies paid to Scotland roughly equate to taxes received from N Sea Oil, this will not continue to be in balance as production declines

    5) The lavish spending of the current Scottish government – social spending per head in Scotland is 13% greater than in the remainder of the UK – will no longer fall on non-Scottish taxpayers
    Lavish spending? You make the higher social spending sound like a bad thing. Better the money spent on our citizens than on follies like Trident!

    6) The Scots will apparently be much happier outside the UK – Who are we to deny them of that happiness?
    More sneering contemptuousness…
    Moggy

    I am an avid supporter of Scots independence and sincerely hope the vote goes the right way later in the year.
    Moggy

    See above…

    in reply to: General Discussion #279435
    Al
    Participant

    Well If Scotland is to keep all the oil revenue, then it’s only fair that they pay the lions share of the national dept, which is how many billions or is it trillions?


    Incredible logic.
    If England wanted independence, could Scotland keep London? If we take on our share in the national debt, then it follows that we take our share of the national assets, too!

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 1,560 total)