As for the cheap gibe about the war,I very much doubt whether a single contributor to this thread is actually old enough to have had the chance of killing enemy forces back then.
If that comment was aimed at me, my comment wasn’t supposed to be a ‘cheap jibe’ – and I have served in some very unfriendly parts of the world where the use of deadly force was a real possibility…
As for the cheap gibe about the war,I very much doubt whether a single contributor to this thread is actually old enough to have had the chance of killing enemy forces back then.
If that comment was aimed at me, my comment wasn’t supposed to be a ‘cheap jibe’ – and I have served in some very unfriendly parts of the world where the use of deadly force was a real possibility…
I wonder if the bleeding hearts in this thread would have balked at using force against those who wanted to invade their country?
Would they class killing enemy forces during wartime ‘murder’?
I wonder if the bleeding hearts in this thread would have balked at using force against those who wanted to invade their country?
Would they class killing enemy forces during wartime ‘murder’?
It’s a very ambiguous definition, isn’t it?
‘Reasonable Force’ is very open to interpretation, by different policemen, judges, jurors, and Joe Public. To me, if someone is caught in your house, it means anything I deem it to mean…
It’s a very ambiguous definition, isn’t it?
‘Reasonable Force’ is very open to interpretation, by different policemen, judges, jurors, and Joe Public. To me, if someone is caught in your house, it means anything I deem it to mean…
Sign In
