Hankyureh lied rather badly in the most recent fiasco of theirs, reporting on the conclusions of a Russian report when they didn’t have a copy of it, or a reliable source who had seen it. In short, it was a textbook case of why I call that particular paper a Hanguleh, or One Dirty Rag.
The South Korean MoD has already named the North Korean-designed new 130-ton mini-sub as probably attacker. The previously un-released sub is named Yeonuh type, and is believed to be the same design as the new Iranian mini-sub.
And the water quality? It’s also called Yellow Sea for a reason.
There has been problems with the White Shark torpedoes before and they weren’t covered up, and besides, that area is really not the regular patrol route of conventional South Korean submarines.
Special Op mini subs though? Yes. However, to the best of my knowledge, the torpedo tube-fitted Dolphin-class mini-subs were retired in the late 90s.
An attack by torpedo has not been ruled out, but is unlikely. The cause of the sinking is unconfirmed and anything else is a rumor. The South Korean military has NOT elevated readiness status from the first time the report came in, and has NOT called back soldiers on leave.
A suicidal attack against port cities by having a submarine mounting a nuclear device has been suggested. While probably not as devastating as an actual strike, it could still severely damage the port facilities. It would be disastrous if that happened to Busan or Inchon.
Well, there has been a number of clashes between North Korean and South Korean FACs in the recent years. But North Korean missile FACs were never really involved. Light gun boats exchanged fires, and North Korean FACs disengaged and ran off whenever larger corvettes arrived on the scene, with the missile FACs never coming in really close.
Rather, it was always the land-based Samlet and Silkworm batteries that lit up to dissuade the ROKN ships from pursuing.
JASDF acquired ~30 AIM-120 missiles and fitted them onto several aircrafts from the Nyutabaru base for testing and evaluation purposes, and perhaps also to study counter-tactics.
I think the Indian Navy is the only Navy in the world that has a brand new design for 16 AshM destroyer.
China has stopped building 16 AshM destroyers some time ago, the last being the Type 052B series in 2003. Since then, every ship only has eight but featured much more comprehensive aerial defenses.
South Korean KDX-3 also has 16 AShM launchers plus whatever she’ll carry in the VLS. That’s an exception though, as the rest of the ships in the fleet carries standard 8.
I’m not aware of any website (be it Korean or English) that has collected such information. Sorry to be of no help.
…and I don’t disagree with you? :D:D
The only point I agree with the other person is that it would be folly to underestimate North Korean military, but we aren’t doing that (if you bother to follow South Korean military build-up programs), so that whole point is moot.
Trying to compare the entire Vietnam war to Korean peninsula is just stupid in my opinion. We don’t have an armed, hostile populace. Well, we don’t have an armed populace period, so aside from few commando raids, the entire South Korea rear is relatively safe. Neither is our government and military as corrupt as South Vietnam, and we’ve had 50+ years to prepare for a war with the North.
It was not North Vs the South. It was North vs the Yanks and thier allies which included the South. Also I can assure you that there are many South Koreans who do not want to fight the North.
Most people would not want to attack North Korea, but that’s completely different from not wanting to fight at all. We have no qualms about defending ourselves against a North Korean aggression. Total pacifists, like in most other countries, are few and far in between. South has much to lose from a war–which is why we will violently lash out against anyone who tries to take it away. North Korea is no different.
I apologize if I have offended South Korean sensitivities. Now, lets get back to the Mosaic corvette design.
Who’s being sensitive now? No need for the smarts.
In the west and other parts of the world yes, possibly because the name of the ship was bit difficult. I’m just saying that Okpo was never a Korean designation as far as I know. All the press releases I’ve looked at from 1996 mentions the ship by name, not by the yard name. I know the name Okpo have flooded back into Korean media and military communities from English-speaking sources however.
I enlarged the model image and they may be Mk 48. Like on KD-1 Okpo, but grouped together differently (per group: 4 missiles facing together, 4 exhausts left and 4 right of those missiles. 4 such groups forward of the bridge). Wonder if a Mk41 tactital module would not offer advantages over this Mk48 set up.
Just as a sidenote, Okpo is the name of the yard. It’s neither the project name or the shipname.
With the massive deck and the high speed, I would love to see this used against North Korea FAC fleet in the west coastline of the Korean peninsula.
If ROK was to get their hands on something I similar, I would like it to have
-1 x 76mm
-2 x 40mm
-1 x RAM
-16~24 VLS primarily for proposed Naval M-SAM (M-SAM currently development under Iron Hawk II program, rumored to be miniaturized S-400 in terms of system, but we’ll just have to wait 3~4 more years)
-Fitted-for-but-what-with:rolleyes: 8 x SSM-700K or Harpoon Block II
We could really use a ship that would be able to keep up with our 40+knot FACs and still be able to comfortably kill theirs while providing at least some air cover against old Styx and Silkworms, possibly newer Chinese C-80X missiles.