dark light

KJlost

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 129 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hypothetical Iraqi Air Force? #2593055
    KJlost
    Participant

    Is that sarcrasm?

    If the Iraqis wanted to rearm their air force, approaching the French might be a good answer. If they’re out of the game, then most definitely Russians. The Su-series would be a decent threat to anyone’s air defense, and it also provides fair bit of air-to-ground capability.

    For training, well if relationship wasn’t an issue, I would suggest the Indians, but that’s probably out of the question. Maybe two-part training program to Pakistan and either China or Russia. The Russians’s didn’t provide whole lot of training before, so why should they be trusted to train pilots properly this time? Can’t tell much about Chinese training standards and their tactical training, so maybe learn to fly the jets in Russia, but receive advanced training in Pakistan.

    in reply to: Japan: Atago class DDG #2057089
    KJlost
    Participant

    KD2 does not seem to have the Nixie.

    I don’t see the usual deployment port no, but LPX has a pair.

    in reply to: Japan: Atago class DDG #2057120
    KJlost
    Participant

    Of course KDX-3 will carry torpedo countermeasures. It just won’t have the Black Dragon TASS installed. Stupid, but money problems. It might change once there is some breathing room in the funding, but from what I’ve heard, KDX-3 won’t have a TASS.

    Atago, I haven’t a clue. I heard it won’t, but that seems odd, even if Atago is a primarily AAW ship.

    in reply to: Japan: Atago class DDG #2057225
    KJlost
    Participant

    I haven’t got a clear indication of that either. This might be like Murasame/Takanami thing where either really works. The project name, I believe, was Heisei 14 DDG, also known as Improved Kongou, or Kongou II program in military circles.

    in reply to: your country armed forces your way #2601746
    KJlost
    Participant

    ” 12 C-5 ”

    Why would Korea need Galaxies ?

    Or is this a wishlist ? 🙂

    Wishlist more or less. South Korea will begin to increase international participation with both ground and naval forces around the world. There is a limit to how much you can go with a medium transport. C-5 will be very helpful for that, but it’s a luxury item, not necessity.

    in reply to: your country armed forces your way #2601970
    KJlost
    Participant

    ROKAF, Republic of Korean Air Force

    Maintain 140 KF-16 fleet, 40 F-15K from as currently planned.

    -Additional purchase of 40 F-15K
    -80 F-16 Block 60 for increased long-range strike capability
    -100 F-35A purchase to replace KF-16s.
    (Or KFX, if JSF deal falls out)
    -40 A-50 attack plane
    -44 T-50
    -*Pursue 20~40 F-22 purchase if at all possible

    -9 E-737
    -6 G-550 ground radar control aircraft
    -12 Hawker800 intelligence aircrafts
    -12 RF-16s
    -E-400 (electronic warfare modified A-400)

    -24 A-400 (replace C-130H)
    -12 C-5
    -16 KC-767

    -12 HH-60
    -6 CH-47F

    As for ROKN aviation wing
    -38 P-8
    -24 SH-60R
    -12 MH-101

    in reply to: Iran says fires "world's fastest underwater missile" #1816308
    KJlost
    Participant

    HAHA TRUST Me the way these NEW WORLD ORDERISTS are going there not going to draft any one in there US ARMY they’ll go with there remaining 450K troops.

    Fine, the person very much likely to die. Hey it’s WWIII, how long do you think it will remain conventional?

    in reply to: How Many U.S. F-15's Are There? #2603036
    KJlost
    Participant

    The first answer got you the number of Es, C/Ds and A/Bs if you gave it a bit (just enough to clash two brain-cells together) of thought.

    KJlost
    Participant

    Why would Singapore, a very solid F-16 operator, want a fighter that’s about 80% of the price and capability?

    in reply to: F-35 & F-22: Two-seat Advanced trainer version? #2585333
    KJlost
    Participant

    I think they’ll jump from advanced trainers to real fighters with simulators to fill the gap.

    in reply to: Carrier based combat planes- most utilised? #2589445
    KJlost
    Participant

    Modern? Or historically?

    I think it’s Harrier either way, but I can’t be really sure about that.

    in reply to: NORTH-KOREAN NAVY #2063749
    KJlost
    Participant

    You know the little history on Koksan gun that they’re somewhat based on old Russian 170mm coastal artillery? They used the ballistic chart of the gun and lengthened the barrel.

    in reply to: NORTH-KOREAN NAVY #2063944
    KJlost
    Participant

    Soho doesn’t leave North Korean shore, most likely a bit afriad of being harrassed by a bunch of American, Japanese, Korean airplanes, against which it has no defense.

    in reply to: NORTH-KOREAN NAVY #2063955
    KJlost
    Participant

    Cave launching bases? Quite real as far as the combined command is concerned. It’s also a standard North Korean tactic to hide behind island’s shadow and pop out at a close range.

    in reply to: PLAAF vs JASDF #2599870
    KJlost
    Participant

    Who said Godzilla was on North Korean pay roll.

    Well, I have yet to see a Gojira rampaging through Pyoung Yang….

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 129 total)