The first pair were delivered about a month ago I think.
Hell we always try. Daewoo sold a 2300ton light frigate to Bangladesh a few years ago. DW is also competing in the Omanese OVP competition, and supported Daesun that sold LPD to Indonesia, and got 209 overhaul deal from Indonesia as well. There have been few other support and light ship exports here and there.
With the increasing designs and sophistication, both Daewoo and Hyundai hopes to jump into internationally competitive warship building yards. Their main selling products is KD-1 based frigate designs and the KD-2. FFX will offer a better export potential however. It’ll be nice to have a single affordable design.
Because 1) they are getting 4 more. 2) the number of total air-defense capable ship in ROKN will be smaller than JMSDFs’.
According to sight report from warships1.com, a Kidd is loitering at the West Coast, not across the Pacific yet.
Navy isn’t considering SPY-1F at all, according to the representatives in Marine Week 2005.
APAR or Sea APAR seems to be likewise out.
A simple system like SMART-S MkII might be being considered. Another option is the navalized system of the KM-SAM system under developement right now. Though the system isn’t deployed yet, the naval version of the radar is being developed right alongside the SAM system with the company’s research funding. The radar itself is said to be quite capable.
Nothing has been determined yet. LPX is a long-term project. There is still many oppurtunity for additional orders. I never imaged we could get the 6 KDX-3 as suggested by the Navy leadership. There have been too many contradicting reports on the activity of the Navy and the government plans, but the reduction and even cancellation of the KDX programs have been discussed before, but its still here, and two ships are undergoing construction as we speak. We’ll see.
As I’ve said, there are two ways to avoid missile falling back to the deck. One is angling the launchers outboard so that the missile falls to the sea after jumping 30~40m from the gas pressure. Second option is pitch control rockets on the missile itself that blows the missile to the side as soon as it is launched. While there might be issues involved with both these methods, there are ways to avoid what you’re talking about from happening.
While a there is a bit of time before it actually enters service, South Korea will be deploying cold-launch VLS on KDX-2 and KDX-3 ships alongside Mk41s for launching anti-sub missiles and cruise missiles. The advantage being listed is the slight increase in range due to the launch method and less possible wear and stress that comes from rocket exhaust among others.
The design, from what I could tell from the Mk41 arragement on Wang Gun and models of KDX-3, isn’t circular, so that’s not a problem. There are two ways to solve the rocket exhaust failure problem, which is angling the launchers outboards so the projectile would go overboard as it is launched. This is the most simple method, but not very space-efficient. Another is using control rocket motor to simple blow the missile overboard as it is being launched. From what I can tell, KM-SAM (land-based SAM system, also using cold-launch method) and the anti-sub missile uses this technique, suggesting that Korean VLS system is up-upright in their installation.
I don’t know anything about ships pre-Cold War. However, I’ve seen some excellent discussions on warships1.com discussion forums. You should try there as well.
K-CIWS is a developement of Goalkeeper, a system in service with the KDX destroyers and the LPX, that’s what he’s saying I believe. K-CIWS is aiming for the FFX program, a light-weight littoral frigate to replace all the Dong Hae, Pohang and Ulsan class ships.
It’s only a slight derivative of Goalkeeper. That really shouldn’t cause too high R&D cost. If we’re lucky, anywhere from 17~24 units could be assured.
Mistral mount in likeness. Uses Russian Igla dual-band seeker for the missile.
Submarines need to acquire their targets somehow too. The Russians had real-time satellite for this task. Can the Chinese copy that method? Or have hundreds of patrol aircrafts? The communication problem is also too large to ignore.
Thos new RoKN tubs look really nice, I hope they have named them decently, one of the previous ones could be mistaken for something really rude.
The Kang Keong class? Which one? Kang Keong, Kang Jin, Ko Reong, Kim Po, Ko Chang, Kum Wha, there are six. I think the picture Level supplied us is Yang Yang class. There is three so far. Yang Yang class (Yang Yang, Ong Jin, Hae Nam) may be cut short in order for the navy to pursue mine clearing helicopter program.
re:
Oh that review was nice. After The Bear and the Dragon, I gave up on Clancy’s work. I thought both Debt of Honor and Clear and Present Danger was bad, but good enough to kill time, but his modern stuff sucks. Didn’t even touch the Teeth of the Tiger. His early works are decent, epscially the Red October and the Red Storm Rising. I’m reading Red Rabit right now, kind of ‘in between’ work. Not sure if I like it yet.