dark light

KJlost

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 121 through 129 (of 129 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: KDX-3 contract give to Hyundai, ROK Navy #2074628
    KJlost
    Participant

    Just few links….

    From Bemil

    http://brd3.chosun.com/bemil/view.html?tb=BEMIL025&pn=1&num=9510

    http://brd3.chosun.com/bemil/view.html?tb=BEMIL025&pn=1&num=9509

    One of KDX-3’s requirement was TMD capability, so they ordered Baseline 7.1 for it, so I’m assuming SM-3 will be included as well.

    in reply to: KDX-3 contract give to Hyundai, ROK Navy #2074670
    KJlost
    Participant

    The VLS positioned on the helo hanger isn’t Mk48. They’ve got 64 Mk41s in the bow, 16 between the hangers, and 48 just behind it.

    The pic isn’t quite right, but shows what I mean.

    http://brd3.chosun.com/bemil/files/BEMIL025/upload/naval15.jpg

    in reply to: What's happening with… thread #2075912
    KJlost
    Participant

    As long as we’re on “What’s happening…” topic…..

    For ROKN – Republic of Korean Navy – several delays in the projects

    -LPX timeline has bee pushed up one year to 2005 to begin construction on the first of the two 19,000 ton flat-top assault ships due to budget constraints.

    -PKMX program to build 9 missile attack boats and several dozen non-missile attack boats may be delayed. Additional equipment installation has added some 100ton to the 350ton missile-version design. So for cost-control reasons, the program may be delayed to re-evaluate the designs.

    -Similiar story with FFX next-gen light coastal frigate program. Ship classes designed to replace the Navy’s aging fleet of Pohang PCCs an Ulsan FFKs may be delayed again due to cost reasons. The frigates, expected to be armed with 76mm gun, SSM-700K ASMs, RAM, Goalkeeper, and helo capacity, are expected to fill the roles of coastal defense frigates. Some 18~27 hulls are expected to be built from this design.

    The new really isn’t suprising since KDX programs appears to be sailing without major troubles, though they do meet some bumps here and there. Construction of the 4th ship of KDX-2 class should be in advanced stages now, with 5th hull being started. 4 more hulls at least is expected, maybe as many as 5~6 more. The KDX programs are the jewels of ROKN, while FFX, PKMX and LPX, while still important, are really secondary programs.

    in reply to: Friction between China and Japan to lead to war? #2670168
    KJlost
    Participant

    dont the F15Js have radar that can be easily upgraded to support the AMRAAM?

    i wouldnt bet on the JDF not having a ARH AAM in any possible conflict scenario. if there are signs that tensions are mounting to a point where opent conflict is a real possibility, then the JDF would most likely order AMRAAMs from the US, which would be shipped to japan in no time. (any talk of china launching a suprise attack on japan are just the delusions of neocons trying desperately to draw paralels between the china of today and the evil japanese empire of WWII :rolleyes: )

    what china has already managed to do is achieve an imbalanced conventional military parity with the JDF. in that i mean that unlike before, the PLA can now effectively deter JDF attacks on chinese assets close to, or on the mainland. whereas before, the only deterants to japanese military hostility were the political and economical reprecussions of such acts, and china’s nuclear card (which china has never used). and while, IMHO china’s land forces are the most powerful in the world in terms of raw fighting strength, the PLA is still some way behind japan in the fields that would count in any possible real life conflict scenarios-the airforce and navy.

    Japan has 30~40 AMRAAMs ohn their arsernal for testing purposes. Their F-15Js can be integrated with them in little time I think.

    in reply to: Friction between China and Japan to lead to war? #2671153
    KJlost
    Participant

    F-2 has entered active service long time ago. Over 80 asirframes of F-2A/B should have entered service already. I really wouldn’t be surprised if limited number of AAM-4 have been integrated with F-2 already and seeing limited service.

    in reply to: S. Korea Short-Lists Bidders for Helicopter Project #2671628
    KJlost
    Participant

    I have no idea really. I guess price thing has matters. Army can acquire 40, 80 at best with AH-64D’s pricetag. If they really want to expand their attack helo fleet, they’ll have to come up with a cheaper alternative. ROKA operates ~70 AH-1J/F, and close to 80~100 MD-500 Defender gunships. Can’t replace the numbers with Apache.

    in reply to: S. Korea Short-Lists Bidders for Helicopter Project #2671675
    KJlost
    Participant

    Alternative to KMH? Of course, just license more UH-60. We’ve already licensed more than 200 airframes currently in our armed forces, whats a few hundred more? 🙂

    Of cours, KAI, wants to gain domestic designing and production capability, and our government is pushing them forward. I don’t know, I just can’t stop thinking that this is going to be a failure.

    in reply to: S. Korea Short-Lists Bidders for Helicopter Project #2671703
    KJlost
    Participant

    The one and same 🙂 Thanks for the welcome.

    What I’m imaging about KAH is that it will be more or less be utilized as a general attack helo, while AH-64D is used as strike force or theater reserve. I really can’t see a medium helo like KMH using Hellfire or the likes. The KMH is still a pretty debated topic though. Many expect it will be cancelled at a later time. They don’t think KAI can do the project effectively.

    in reply to: S. Korea Short-Lists Bidders for Helicopter Project #2671762
    KJlost
    Participant

    First time posting…..

    Anyway, KMH and KAH are domestically designed and built helicopter programs. AH-X, plans to acquire heavy attack helicopter is still in play. AH-64D being the most likely candidate. A few years ago, AH-64D and Rooivalk were the two contenders remaining for the program. Because of budget restraints, AH-X had been held-off, but I’m sure it will resume in a few years and acquire the 40 Apache helos the Army wants. KMH, KAH, as far as the military is concerned, is a secondary program. I suspect KAH will be a light helo like Mangusta, not an Apache competitor.

Viewing 9 posts - 121 through 129 (of 129 total)