dark light

EN830

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 4,978 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1094390
    EN830
    Participant

    I wonder why they have not started to think outside of the box for funding: they can’t use volunteers day to day, well why not change your funding model.

    Display the aircraft at Airshows for free, but then have a massive team of volunteers with buckets collecting as the punters leave….or as she is flying.

    It won’t work, you have to get the punters to pay while the interest is there (before or during the event), once the interest has gone (flown away), the likely hood of collecting money drops rather rapidly.

    Anyone who has done event photography will tell you this. It is much easier to sell a photograph onsite, there and then while the punter has an interest rather than placing them on a website for the punters to buy later.

    in reply to: BoB Film Props #1096600
    EN830
    Participant

    Thank you, never watched it on our nice big wide screen:-

    Wife is in bed with a migraine, nothing of note on TV, so BOB in the DVD and Robert Shaw, Ian McShane and Edward Fox just rolling in, in their Hurricanes on a French airfield.

    Feet up, sod it no beer ah well !!!!

    DAKA-DAKA-DAKA-DAKA-DAKA-DAKA-DAKA-DAKA-DAKA………….

    in reply to: which base is this? #1100451
    EN830
    Participant

    Is it former RAF Ouston

    in reply to: VC10's at Brunty #1100459
    EN830
    Participant

    I’m all for old types, however at some point realism has to take precedence over sentimentality, if not the UK would have airfields full of corroding hulks of past types that have past their sell by date and usefulness, but have been kept to pamper to the sentiments of enthusiasts and anoraks.

    The VC10 is/has come to the end of its life, the Harrier, even though the GR9 is a far cry from the P1127, can trace it’s roots back to the early 60’s and is a relatively high maintenance airframe when compared to the more modern types such as Tornado or Typhoon.

    Lets not forget that the previous incumbents got rid of the SHARs and Jaguar, so even though are now calling foul, are equally culpable in the demise of the UK’s armed forces.

    in reply to: VC10's at Brunty #1100584
    EN830
    Participant

    My have room for one next year, but will have to be delivered to France 🙂

    in reply to: Dambusters Declassified – BBC2, 17th Oct 8PM. #1104607
    EN830
    Participant

    To be honest I did learn a few things from the programme I didn’t know, for instance, who came up with the stage light idea, the fact that the crews designed and built their own variations of the bomb sight and that the dams were highlighted as targets way back in 1937.

    Some of these facts may have been well known to those who are learned of the subject, to those like me who haven’t researched it in any great detail these were new revelations.

    in reply to: Swedish F-4 Phantom II #1119939
    EN830
    Participant

    Obviously it’s a Phantom Swedish Phantom !

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1127736
    EN830
    Participant

    I thought that VTS was a charitable trust, and therefore Pleming just a trustee, in which case the disposal of an asset has to be for the benefit of the beneficiaries, i.e the Nation, would selling it be so, and where would any monies realised after cost go, or would it just be sold to cover those costs ????

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1129713
    EN830
    Participant

    The difference between us is that I would hope it continues to give pleasure to many hundreds of thousands of some of us over the next 1,2 3 years or more.

    What difference ? If it continues to fly, well and good, I will continue to watch it, if it doesn’t then it will be a loss but not a great one in real terms.

    No doubt out friends at the British Legion will be having their annual poppy appeal shortly and I very much doubt ANYONE will be ranting that they’re ‘at it again’ or ‘out with the begging bowl once more’. No, of course you wont.

    Several reasons why your observation is wrong, the RBL do a lot of good work supporting ex-servicemen and their families, they’re not there for entertainment purposes. They have been collecting for this purpose for 89 years and I don’t ever recall them threatening to close down the operation because they need another £xxxk to keep themselves going. To be quiet honest your comment is offensive.

    Yes I will give to the RBL, before giving money supporting a large piece of triangular shaped tin which quite frankly is just a large hole in the sky into which money is being pored.

    It’s not a question of like or dislike, it’s a question of being realistic.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1129848
    EN830
    Participant

    As to your desire to close it, well, that is of course an opinion to which you are entitled.

    Not a desire, it’s an opinion, which you have kindly pointed out I am entitled to, thank you.

    There is no doubt that to a certain element of air show goers the Vulcan is the cutting edge of historic aviation and the draw to get them through the gate, and if it were grounded then they may not attend. But for the majority who go to air shows for the spectacle as a whole whether the Vulcan is there or not, they will continue to go regardless.

    I’m sure they will raise the £400k in pledges and it will continue to grace the skies until this time next year, when another appeal and threat goes out.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1130755
    EN830
    Participant

    A travesty of what, exactly?

    The continue requests for money, it’s like a scene from men in black, there is always another plea for money around the corner.

    It’s time to ground it.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1131070
    EN830
    Participant

    And the travesty goes on and on.

    in reply to: Whirlwinds, shipping reccos & BC minelaying #1131302
    EN830
    Participant

    Hi Paul

    I was told a few years ago that acting on a tip off from the chaps at Bletchley and also to disguise the source, coastal command would often send out an aircraft to stooge around the Channel Islands looking for suitable targets, this would then be followed up by 10 Group and their squadrons to catch the surface vessels on the move.

    How true this is, I have no idea, and unfortunately can not remember the exact source to re-check the details and how they knew this.

    There are certainly accounts of Sunderlands flying low over Jersey, which must have been frightening for the crews considering the AA concentration on the Island.

    EN830
    Participant

    Nicely put Rob and welcome to the forum.

    EN830
    Participant

    Just caught up with this programme, having missed it at the weekend due to family commitments.

    I thoroughly enjoyed it and don’t think the involvement of the McGregor brothers distracted from the story and the history one bit.

    In fact, if it made little Johnny put down the Play Station to watch a bit of history because O’B wan Kenobi was flying in the back of an old aircraft, then their inclusion was well worth it.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 4,978 total)