dark light

EN830

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,496 through 3,510 (of 4,978 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Jargon #1991884
    EN830
    Participant

    I bet it can be done !!!!

    in reply to: New Film: The Few #1561959
    EN830
    Participant

    By the way, the Aircraft in the BoB sequence in harbour had Eagle Sqn motifs on the side of the aircraft, is this authentic for that period?

    Not sure if the Spit’s would have had “American Eagle Squadron” scrawled down the side in 1941, however the Hurricane featured was HAC’s MkXlla which previously wore 71 Sqn markings and retained them for filming.

    in reply to: Pearl Harbor #1561995
    EN830
    Participant

    And as for this The Few film, the first glaring inaccuracy is casting Cruise…..

    Billy Fiske was 29 when killed in 1941, Cruise is 42 now…….. :rolleyes:

    It goes downhill from there on……… 😉

    Have they started filming this epic?

    Does anyone know where they will be/are filming and whose aircraft will be used?

    And before anyone points it out, P51’s were used by the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain :rolleyes:

    in reply to: reverse daylight savings time #1991955
    EN830
    Participant

    But that would mean it would still be dark at 9am, so there’s no gain.

    in reply to: We need a new general discussion forum #1991959
    EN830
    Participant

    Yup

    in reply to: BMW drivers are smiling #1991963
    EN830
    Participant

    Depends what your present wife drives, possibly!

    Flood.

    Me mad !!!!! 😉

    in reply to: Merlins over Malta #1562094
    EN830
    Participant

    Glenn

    Do you think there will be any problem getting the Hurricane fabric signed by the veterans and Muriel Pavlow without incurring costs?

    in reply to: BMW drivers are smiling #1991970
    EN830
    Participant

    Well I have a Porsche, Chrysler Voyager and a 1992 Sierra 4×4, my sex drive is totally confused, do I have to multiply by one car and subtract the third to get my ratio ?

    in reply to: We need a new general discussion forum #1992074
    EN830
    Participant

    Not huffy, just defensive

    in reply to: We need a new general discussion forum #1992084
    EN830
    Participant

    Yeah, but these topics are beyond wide ranging, don’t you think?

    No these topics are in general good humoured and help to while away the time.

    Every threads doesn’t have to be serious or factual, and as has been said before if you doen’t like the subject don’t read it, it’s as simple as that.

    in reply to: We need a new general discussion forum #1992092
    EN830
    Participant

    A discussion forum?

    Flood.

    No a Banal

    in reply to: We need a new general discussion forum #1992135
    EN830
    Participant

    Doesn’t Manchester have one of those?

    in reply to: We need a new general discussion forum #1992178
    EN830
    Participant

    This one should be renamed ‘random discussion forum’. 🙂

    Really don’t see your point, so I thought I’d give you a few definitions of “GENERAL”

    Universal
    All Purpose
    Wide Ranging
    Broad
    Common
    Broad Spectrum

    So you see “GENERAL” covers everything that is discussed on this forum, or are you just looking for an argument?

    in reply to: When did the last Lancaster fly? #1562697
    EN830
    Participant

    Not sure of the exact dates but from the various books on the subject I can fiind the following.

    Bomber Command squadrons continued to use the Lancasters until 1953 and other RAF Lancs continued to serve until 1964 undertaking a variety of non-combat roles such as photographic reconnaissance duties in Africa.

    in reply to: Australia to shoot and kill 20,000 koalas #1992443
    EN830
    Participant

    Uni?:confused: Yeah – Broadmoor! Was in the cell two up from yours for a couple of weeks. Then you got the governors eye…:eek:

    Flood.

    Yeah I got his kidney and liver as well, got any chianti?

Viewing 15 posts - 3,496 through 3,510 (of 4,978 total)