dark light

EN830

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,586 through 3,600 (of 4,978 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #365155
    EN830
    Participant

    We should do a transfer deal before it’s too late and get some return for our investment.

    Roll up roll up, get one New Zealand free with every Australia bought.:D

    I’m sure some wealthy American with more money than sense would be interested.

    Seriously though it’s a shame but it’s inevitable that the Australians will go down the republican route, the links with the mother country are becoming less and less with the influx of immigrants from the far east and the like.

    Whats the likely hood of the Australian Labour Party winning the next election ?

    in reply to: Republic in Australia #1954923
    EN830
    Participant

    We should do a transfer deal before it’s too late and get some return for our investment.

    Roll up roll up, get one New Zealand free with every Australia bought.:D

    I’m sure some wealthy American with more money than sense would be interested.

    Seriously though it’s a shame but it’s inevitable that the Australians will go down the republican route, the links with the mother country are becoming less and less with the influx of immigrants from the far east and the like.

    Whats the likely hood of the Australian Labour Party winning the next election ?

    in reply to: Correct way to abbreviate "squadron"? #1608265
    EN830
    Participant

    Originally posted by Snapper
    Aha! Sqdn. should be after the number, sqdn. if it is not specific – or sort of…ie: 609 Squadron, or the squadron, 609 Sqdn. or the sqdn. 609 Sqn or the sqn.

    S/Ldr was wartime abbreviation, not Sqdn Ldr or Sdn Ldr.

    I’m taking this from ORB’s, diaries, letters, combat / intell reports etc all from one sqdn though, so perhaps there is an element of it having been ‘the form’ there, or with the I.O.

    Didn’t intend clobbering you Papa Lima!

    Anyway, have sent a request to a 1938 Auxiliary. Now, it was A.A.F. at the time, then R.A.A.F. Then became RAuxAF – presumably because of the R.A.A.F. appearing in large numbers over here! Except that foreign pilots in the R.A.F. were R.A.F., not RNZAF, RAAF, RSAAF, RCAF etc. Or something like that. (and I gave up on the full stops, insert wehere needed!)

    Not sure what you mean by foreign pilots in the RAF, surely RCAF crews were exactly that “RCAF” and the same with RAAF etc…. They were attached to the RAF or served on RCAF Squadrons within the RAF as in Don McPhail (KIA Nov 42) who served on 263 Sqn RAF but served in the RCAF.

    Foreign nationals from occupied countries were in general enlisted in the RAFVR for the duration of the war and maintained RAF ranks, however they also had the rank equating to their own air force, such as Bernard Scheihauer (Shot Mar 44) of the FFAF who had the RAF rank of Pilot Officer and the French rank of Sous Lt .

    Prof Alan Brown wrote an excellent book on the subject of Airmen in Exile that illustrates how these airmen were integrated into the RAF, but also how the various national Air Forces were able to keep their own structure.

    But this doesn’t solve the problem of whether it’s Sqn or Sqdn.

    in reply to: Merlins over Malta #1608335
    EN830
    Participant

    Yes of course you can Rob, just beware of MRSEN830, she doesn’t take any prisoners.

    I’m already being berated about anoraks, collecting numbers and a treatment for insomnia etc…….

    in reply to: Merlins over Malta #1608389
    EN830
    Participant

    Not so much a bus as a van, what time?

    in reply to: General Discussion #365226
    EN830
    Participant

    Hope to see Anna as herself here tonight,:D πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€ πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚ πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜‰ or at least this week.

    in reply to: The Anna on line is not Anna #1954967
    EN830
    Participant

    Hope to see Anna as herself here tonight,:D πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€ πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚ πŸ™‚ πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜‰ or at least this week.

    in reply to: Correct way to abbreviate "squadron"? #1609048
    EN830
    Participant

    Originally posted by WebPilot
    Heh! Well, for myself, I was “in” the RAuxAF and “on” 600 Sqn.

    I recall reading in CF Rawnsley’s biography (or was it Jack Currie’s?) how a slick talking imposter was unmasked in the RAF club in the immediate postwar years as he talked of being “in” the six hundred and seventeenth squadron.

    My avatar though not very distinct is of a chap who won the DFC with 600 Sqn in 1941 on Beaufighters. Robert S Woodward.

    Co-incidence with this months Aero-plane magazine and their article on the Ar 234 is that Hans Georg Batcher who features on page 75, was claimed to have been shot down by this pilot over the Bristol Channel in 1941. However using all his skill Batcher managed to return to Normandy and crash land his badly damaged KG100 HE111.

    But I digress from the thread.

    in reply to: Possible loss to the Nation? #1609875
    EN830
    Participant

    Maybe the Lottery commission could chip in save this medal for the country!!!

    in reply to: A new beginning for the forum #679884
    EN830
    Participant

    Originally posted by Robbo
    Fingers crossed for the future. However, you do still have one of the protagonists lurking under a freshly created identity. Stopthefighting’s profile looks awfully familiar – particularly the AOL messaging address.

    Rob

    Well spotted Robbo, I’ve PM’d the Webmaster asking if he is going to block RICHARD19896, hopefully he will. But just in case he is using a different PC, it may be worth making the Webmaster aware of this new identity.

    in reply to: A new beginning for the forum #679888
    EN830
    Participant

    Well done Ian, this is good to hear.

    We were all guilty in some part of escalating the situation at the weekend, in a vain attempt to make the people concerned tow the line, and for our part I would like to apologise. I can only say that our intension were meaningful and in no way meant to offend anyone who uses the forum as it is meant to be used, as a tool to communicate and exchange views on what we all love aviation, be it Historic, Commercial, Military or General.

    Let’s hope that this is now the end of the meaningless flaming that has been perpetrated on this particular forum over the past week.

    Kind regards to all from a warm but windy Jersey C.I.

    in reply to: Correct way to abbreviate "squadron"? #1610120
    EN830
    Participant

    Originally posted by atc pal
    Sqn (capital “s”) is still used officially.

    Is it correct that in the RAF it is pronounced f.ex “Two squadron” / 2 Sqn ? And in the USAF f. ex. “Twenty second squadron” / 22’nd Sqn ?

    Best regards

    Generally RAF Sqn’s are quoted as either Number 2 Squadron RAF, or 2 Squadron RAF or in the case of higher numbers such as 617 Sqn – Six One Seven Squadron, it’s only when you read articles written by our cousins from the other side of the pond, that you may come across such quotes as the RAF’s 2nd Squadron or the Six Hundred and Seventh Squadron of the RAF.

    The Americans tend to quote their Squadrons as 6th Fighter Sqn or 502nd Fighter Sqn of such and such Fighter Group.

    That’s the way I read it anyway.

    in reply to: General Discussion #365353
    EN830
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flood
    Got a message from the Webmaster – you can guess the result.

    Flood.

    He’s taken the boy by the horns and banned him.

    Hopefully his cohorts will be processed in the same manner.

    Thank you to the Webmaster.

    in reply to: The Anna on line is not Anna #1955046
    EN830
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flood
    Got a message from the Webmaster – you can guess the result.

    Flood.

    He’s taken the boy by the horns and banned him.

    Hopefully his cohorts will be processed in the same manner.

    Thank you to the Webmaster.

    in reply to: General Discussion #365392
    EN830
    Participant

    Originally posted by Snapper
    EN830 the butterfly cakes.

    Mark

    Snapper why don’t you make those special fairy cakes that you do so well.

    Have a good one KEV.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,586 through 3,600 (of 4,978 total)