That must be the ‘naughty field’ at Duxford is it? 😀
I fail to see how anyone can watch the Red Arrows, and not think what they do is special. :confused:
And the team are most definitely flying legends, always have been, and come from the greatest formation display flying lineage in the world, dating back to the 1920’s 🙂
The mound was a mixed blessing. Unfortunately its loss probably means that the crowd line at Duxford will host more of the step ladder and wind breaker brigade. 🙁
Have you got a source for those figures?
If they are correct, given the huge advantages the Euro is providing the German economy (while sucking the blood out of the rest of western Europe), it is the UK that is getting truly shafted.
It’s a great shame. As a Mark One it has very little relevance in the states unless it was with Eagle Squadron (which it wasn’t) It was never flown by an American, no offence intended of course.
The fact we may never see it in the skies above Britain again is tragic. Which plane will we lose next I wonder?
Grumman Bearcats and Tigercats have little relevance to the UK, but I have still greatly enjoyed watching them fly here.
The warbird community is a world wide community, and while I will miss P9374, she will get to perform at some of the best airshows in the world, with a whole new audience. 😎
Thanks for sharing 🙂
The Stratofreighter always struck me as a very odd type for the Spanish to operate.
5. Explain the mechanism for bombs causing a widespread plume of Sarin to aerosol through a neighborhood but not ignite the gas, or degrade it?
You must have access to before and after aerial imagery to come to that conclusion, can you please share that?
There’s a lot you can say about the quality (or lack thereof) of articles in the Mail, but it is the best by a country mile for images. Thanks for sharing 🙂
There are plenty of Eurosceptics in the EU parliament, although many of them still support EU membership as they see it as the ‘lesser evil’ (for want of a better term). Unfortunately they are outnumbered many times by federalists, which is why anything passed down from the commission regarding further EU integration often gets the rubber stamp with little opposition save a few loud but meaningless objections from people like Nigel Farage.
The opposition for giving Britain a punishment settlement will come from the EU’s 30,000 corporate lobbyists, who won’t want trade barriers with a huge, important, and profitable market.
If you do some searching, there’s a few pics around showing at least 3 unassembled Lancasters in a hangar together.
I should also think that given their size, they are stored in smaller groups, and they probably arrived at different times.
That doesn’t change the fact that he has a fleet of mockup aircraft made especially for this film, sat around doing nothing. It will happen i’m sure, but these directors often have very busy schedules.
That very much depends on your definition of “good” in this context. All we can say at the moment is that things will be different. Some things will undoubtedly be worse, and some things better. As a democrat, I prefer my government to be more local, and locally accountable, and I don’t see why some MEP in the furthest reaches of Eastern Europe should have a say in national laws, and vice versa. In this respect the new arrangement will be preferable, from my point of view at least.
And Peter Jackson was going to make a Dambuster film. Not holding breath then.
Considering Mr Jackson now owns a small squadron of full scale mockup Lancasters, and a single Wellington (no doubt costing several million), I would be very surprised if that doesn’t go ahead.
https://dambustersblog.com/2012/12/30/jacksons-model-lancaster-in-close-up/
An interesting point raised and a lengthy discussion but obviously not for Brexit discussions.
Last week I was in NYC, Madrid the week before, Chennai the week before that and just about to head out to Dublin this afternoon. In the last year I’ve flown almost every week. This is not unique and is business travel that many do. Without it, there is no business. Without a decent bilateral agreement(s) then it is made a whole lot harder and business suffers and the price of trade and thus inflation rises considerably.
Reducing travel (using the methods available to us now) will be necessary to tackle man made climate change. While I get your points about commerce , I’m afraid that is insignificant when weighed with our planets ability to sustain us. Thankfully technology is starting to provide us with viable solutions (renewable energy powering various forms of transport, meetings being conducted via Skype etc). But free movement as we know it will have to end at some point.
Will the lack of an air agreement, an open skies agreement, affect trade, businesses, movement to Europe and further afield to trade in this brave new world of ours? YES
A friend of mine has an Italian wife. She moved here for work, and has now settled here. They have two children. She flies home to see her parents maybe 4-6 times a year, they come here at least 3 times a year. Her brother lives in France, so she flies out there, he flies here, and he presumably flies to Italy too. So between them, they probably fly between them well over 20 times a year in Europe, just visiting family. Now try and extrapolate that by the many tens of millions who have moved all over Europe because of free movement.
There is a valid social and societal argument to be made for free movement, but environmentally it is catastrophic.