This chap has undoubtedly got mental problems, but I don’t understand how locking him away for the rest of his life is going to benefit him, his dead mother, or society.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-25776991
After an argument, he battered his mother to death, dismembered her corpse, and then buried the body parts in a suitcase, in a public place. If the £37,000.00 a year figure above is the average cost of keeping a prisoner, it would be fair to assume that someone like this is going to cost the tax payer a hell of a lot more.
I think we should also look at most murders with a degree of pity. Though there are some that are just unspeakably terrible individuals, I’d wager that a high proportion of them are mentally ill, as are many prisoners for all crimes. This doesn’t excuse their crimes or mean we have to forgive them, but executing the mentally ill? That’s the best solution?
You can’t use mental health as an excuse, and then say it isn’t an excuse.
Someone who is such a danger to society, that they kill people, is beyond help. Justice is about balance, and once someone is dead, that is permanent. How can you justify giving that person another shot at life, when they’ve permanently taken that away from someone else? And imprisoning someone who is mentally ill is crueler than putting them out of their misery.
I agree with your sentiment about not giving the state the power to condemn people to die, but there are ways around that. For example, you could have a sentencing jury, made up of random members of the public that decide the punishment for such crimes.
How many innocent people could we help in this country with the money we’re spending keeping murderers and pedophiles alive?
Byron is a burger restaurant, and it is fantastic!
That is crazy, and just demonstrates how far out of hand public spending has got.
I agree that state owned companies have a very poor track record (that goes for state owned anything!). Perhaps there could be a middle ground with essentials? We certainly don’t want to be going back to the dark old days, when the state even owned a removals firm! 😀 But, on the other hand, the thought of private control of water and energy does not fill me with confidence.
And do you realise how much Brit companies own overseas? The market is truly global now. It doesn’t bother me – if people are gainfully employed and it all increases our GDP it’s better than having no inward investment and a stagnating economy, surely?
I agree, to an extent, though I believe all critical utilities should be owned by the state.
Just to clarify, it is not in its original paint, but a later wartime scheme.
It was painted in the later scheme during the war, so it’s still in the paint in which it served.
There are plenty of airworthy Spitfires in the UK, and the early marques are reasonably well represented now. This is a rare aircraft, being in it’s original paint, and should not be significantly reworked for the sake of making it airworthy.
It would be nice if it was moved around the country a bit though, so that people from all areas could get a close up look at this survivor.
Would I be right in thinking that this is *probably* the most valuable, non airworthy Spitfire?
I could imagine it being replaced with a replica, but I couldn’t see it being sold.
There would be an outcry if the press got hold of it.
What a relief!
The whole ‘freedom of movement’ policy within the EU is being abused. The evidence is all around us, look at the immigration stats. Then look at how overburdened the entire infrastructure of our nation is.
Unless all nations within the EU have a common standard of living, with common benefits and a common health system, it is all deeply weighed against us.
Those laws need fixing.
This system is being abused, and being abused at our expense.
I was told on Monday night that I’m to become an uncle in September, so you certainly have my deepest sympathies.
Life can be so cruel sometimes. 🙁
XB70 Valkyrie, and Hughes Hercules are two significant survivors.