The concern is that ‘give way to’ could be interpreted to mean: “If you think you have enough room to pull out in front of the other aircraft, go ahead” as it does on the road.
No disprespect mate, but I hope you don’t drive anywhere that I do. 😉
Both on the road and at the airport give way is an abbreviated form of ‘give right of way to’ in other words, let any other one go first.
1L.
XL Airways, wasn’t it?
That’s what I had thought, so I was puzzled as to why the expression ‘give way’ would be an issue for a UK based pilot. Now that I think about it though, the Lufthansa incident involved a Futura aircraft so it makes more sense. The XL aircraft was involved with the bmi Baby collision.
1L.
Remind me whose 737 was involved.
1L.
Did the BA ones ever get the BOAC livery
I don’t believe so. As far as I know they were originally in the Concorde ‘house’ colours during test flying, then went into the BA ‘red tail’ livery before the inaugural commercial service.
Couldn’t swear to that though.
1L.
A slightly different perspective.
When Braniff “Owned” Concorde on the internal US flights, for a year, how much decal changing was there? I believe they had a large decal for the American registration #, but what else?
Between Early 1979 and spring 1980 Braniff used aircraft owned by BA and AF for their short-lived Concorde flights from IAD to DFW, with Braniff crews taking over the aircraft from the crew who brought them in from LHR and CDG.
The Braniff crews operated the aircraft on the US register and to US procedures which meant that the aircraft reg’s and ship library were changed each time the crew changed at IAD. The registration was changed by replacing the first part of the G- or F- registration with N94, eg: G-BOAA became N94AA and F-BVFC became N94FC. A sticker could be used for this as the aircraft flew subsonically over the US.
The Braniff livery often seen on models and publicity material was never actually applied to an aircraft.
1L.
And did Singapore AL operate a similar arrangement?
The BA/SQ arrangement for Concorde flight from LHR to SIN (via BAH) was effectively an early codeshare agreement. The aircraft were operated by BA, although SQ did provide 3 out of the 6 cabin crew.
G-BOAD was the dedicated aircraft for the operation and was painted with the SQ livery on it’s left and BA livery on it’s right.
Flights were originally launched in Dec ’77, although they were suspended after only 3 return flights, due to problems with routings to avoid sonic boom disturbance. They were reintroduced after these problems were solved in Jan ’79, but were never a huge success and were permanantly withdrawn in Nov ’80.
1L.
This could be a real money spinner for AA based on my experience of US customers. “Can I get a blanket” is very often the first thing they say as they board the aircraft, even on a 30 minute hop!
1L.
Okay, maybe not quite the idea of the thread, but what might have been!
That livery is vomit inducing, sorry 🙂
I agree on the shade of green (although G-JEDP is worse with the blue clashing beautifully with the green!) but I do think it’s a very clever livery and very Kulula.
1L.
Okay, let me state quite catigorically that this article and the one in The Telegraph it refers to are complete nonsense.
When arriving in certain countries, any open wine (ie open full sized bottles in First and Club) has to be disposed of down the drain to comply with local regulations. A Telegraph reporter on board a flight saw this and decided for themself that what they were witnessing was crew wasting wine as some sort of protest. This was then reported as fact.
BA have contacted The Telegraph with a correction, but as yet this has not been printed. As has been said many times on this forum, why let the truth get in the way of a good story.
1L.
i know of no such policy on any other airline
Probably true of a policy as in this report Steve. I have worked for three other UK airlines over the years and two of them had policies similar to the actual BA one. The other airline was so long ago that these issues probably weren’t given much thought at the time.
1L.
Has the nose gear collapsed or sunk?
1L.
their number of flights delayed by more than an hour is better than yours at 2.6% vs. 3.9%.
I seem to recall reading that once a flight reaches a certain delay ex-base Ryanair’s policy is to cancel so as to protect it’s punctuality statistics. I would think inbound flights are a different matter as the aircraft needs to be brought back to base regardless.
1L.
It would be unwise of me to comment on a matter relating to my employer going through court, but the article linked to above does not explain the policy correctly.
1L.