dark light

OneLeft

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,009 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Boeing custermer code -36(BA) #640426
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Hi Bmused,

    It’s taken from the BA website. It only shows the tail on there too, not the whole aircraft.

    1L.

    in reply to: Boeing custermer code -36(BA) #640438
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Not sure about the other carriers, but Caledonian (at that time owned by BA) had 236’s because they leased their 757’s from BA, and Air Europe at various times leased and acquired 236’s from BA. I particularily remember G-BKRM going back and forward between the two companies like a yoyo.

    in reply to: Cabin Crew, lend me your ears. #657590
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Absolutely agree with Softlad’s points.

    Just to add that at First Choice they are really into appearance so immaculate personal grooming is a must.

    Also whilst it’s really important to be outgoing, you also have to show a genuine interest in other people, so don’t try to be the sole centre of attention. Listening to others where appropriate and encouraging quieter candidates will get extra brownie points.

    Wish her luck from me.

    1L.

    in reply to: BA & AVOD #657758
    OneLeft
    Participant

    BA’s longhaul 767’s are about start their cabin refits. This will result in the same seats and IFE as the 747’s and 777’s.

    PTV’s will be included with the current ‘Highlife’ branded 18 channel system which replaced the ‘Omnia’ brand last Autumn.

    There are two systems in use at the moment, Rockwell Collins or GEMIS depending on the particular aircraft, and I believe one is AVOD able, but not the other. Eventually AVOD should be introduced, but of course ‘eventually’ is a long time at BA!

    I think it is unlikely that all 4 cabins will be fitted to the 767’s, more likely to have just 3 (CW, WTP and WT).

    It is also possible (but not confirmed) that as the A321’s arrive from October onwards the shorthaul 767’s will transfer to longhaul. This fits with the shorthaul policy of smaller aircraft/higher frequency.

    1L.

    in reply to: Disgusted with British Airways #690415
    OneLeft
    Participant

    On the subject of airlines contacting you, or not…

    I guess maybe this is one for airlines to learn about how you or I feel in this circumstance, but the simple fact is that they won’t contact you!

    Put simply, you report your bag missing and fill in the report. They will (hopefully) find your bag, and deliver it to you, contacting you only at this stage if necessary to make arrangements.

    As I said before, phone calls along the way don’t speed up the process, so they won’t make them, and they don’t expect you to.

    Like I said, perhaps airlines need to appreciate that this is a bigger deal to us than they think and understand that a phone call would help reassure us.

    1L.

    in reply to: Eal 757 #690438
    OneLeft
    Participant

    LBA,

    EAL is a shortened version of European Air Lines the name used for certain parts of the company at one time. If I remember rightly EAL was used for regular charter work, while EAC was used only for sub-charter work for other carriers. I clearly remember some of the 111’s having EAC on the tail.

    Can’t help you on the EAF flight prefix though.

    1L.

    in reply to: Disgusted with British Airways #690440
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Sorry to hear about your luggage problems. I have been there myself and know it can be a pain, but I have to say that I have always had good service in getting my bag back to me, both with BA and others.

    I would like to think that in the interest of trying to appease you that your £8 would be refunded.

    I suspect however that the answer will be that you didn’t HAVE to make the calls, and that you certainly didn’t HAVE to call at peak mobile rates, I think phone boxes still exist!

    If you hadn’t made the calls the likelyhood is that the baggage tracing system would have got your bag back to you in the same amount of time. If you made the calls in the hope of hurrying things along a: they wouldn’t have done so, and b: making them will be viewed as your own choice.

    That said I still hope you get your cash back.

    1L.

    ps: It’s a looooong time since BA claimed to be “the worlds favourite airline!”

    in reply to: VS Lady In Red #709726
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Lady In Red

    Lady in Red is G-VBUS.

    Sorry to disappoint, but VBUS is a 340-300 not a -600.

    I’m sure Upper Class was excellent nonetheless.

    1L.

    in reply to: British Airways pulls out of San Diego #736338
    OneLeft
    Participant

    I know it’s always disappointing for people affected by routes being withdrawn, but as I have said in other threads emotion aside, airlines are in business to produce a profit.

    Full aeroplanes aren’t making money if you are having to heavily discount tickets in order to fill the aircraft.

    PHX/SAN was split into stand alone routes a few years ago in order to allow the very successful PHX route to develop further. However as a seperate route SAN was never a business success, and in todays climate no airline can operate a route that doesn’t justify its existance.

    1L.

    in reply to: British Airways winter programmeF #736850
    OneLeft
    Participant

    The shorthaul routes mentioned won’t be swapping to T4 until Summer 2004 at the earliest, and even then will only be moved when a similar number of longhaul movements per day can be moved to T1 in addition to the JNB and NRT flights moving this year.

    As for the LOS moving back to LGW nothing official yet from either BA or the unions so it seems unlikely for now at least.

    1L.

    in reply to: Identification plates #737849
    OneLeft
    Participant

    When G-BEKG left Euroair it became G-DAAL with Emerald Airways before being withdrawn in 1997, by which time it was 34 years old, having been built in 1963.

    During its time with Euroair it flew in the colours of Air Atlantique and British Independant Airways as well.

    G-BKWB, built in 1978, also flew in the colours of Yorkshire European Airways. It became G-OEAB, then in due course went to BAC Leasing, before transferring to the Dutch register, then coming back to the UK as G-OBPL.

    It’s sister aircraft G-BTAA, followed a similar career, becoming G-OEAA, but was detroyed in 1995. Not sure of the circumstances.

    G-BLVG is proving a little ellusive, but leave it with me.

    I don’t remember much about Euroair, but I do remember seeing them around the UK in the late 80’s/early 90’s. They tried to build a regional network with limited success (as many others did at that time) Would be interested if anyone else remebers more.

    1L.

    in reply to: Concorde Letter in this months issue #738353
    OneLeft
    Participant

    The letter isn’t absolutely accurate, but it is nearer the truth than any other I have seen.

    It isn’t a case of Airbus needing two airlines flying Corcorde for it to be worthwhile, they have been pressuring BA and AF to ground the aircraft for a long time now, as truth be told it has been a commercial liability to all three companies for some time now.

    With AF deciding to ground their fleet BA were backed into a corner as Airbus piled on the pressure to do the same. I also suspect that it was good timing for BA.

    I understand the emotion of this aircraft ( I had in fact just applied to work on the fleet when its retirement was announced (I am BA cabin Crew)), however bottom line is that airlines, even the big ones, are businesses that are about making money, and this aircraft is a commercial nightmare in todays aviation industry.

    Regarding Richard Branson and Concorde, he is doing what he does best, milking a publicity opportunity! If he thought for one moment he had any chance of getting his hands on Concorde he wouldn’t have said a word about it. As it is he can bleat on about it without any risk of Virgin ever having to operate the aircraft.

    Concorde would be a disaster for Virgin, and as a great fan of the airline, I think that would be a bigger shame than Concorde being retired.

    1L.

    in reply to: 2 Concordes into LHR? #642612
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Extra Concorde

    The ‘extra’ concorde was returning from an airtest following maintenance.

    A third of the way across the atlantic and back is the usual.

    1L

    in reply to: What will I be flying? #643418
    OneLeft
    Participant

    Hi Andrew

    The specific aircraft probably won’t be allocated for some time yet, but if you can let me have a flight number I’ll keep an eye on it at work and see if I can get you a registration nearer the time.

    1L

    in reply to: Saab 340 #645100
    OneLeft
    Participant

    SAAB

    From a passenger point of view I liked the 340.

    I visitied GCI many times when my good mate Wys was living there. I flew on Aurigny SAABs several times, with Wys flying on a couple of occasions.

    I much prefer the SAAB to the ATR. It’s a shame that the ATR fits Aurignys future needs better that the SAAB does. I’d like to have seen the 2000 in their colours.

    1L

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,009 total)