dark light

JollyGreenSlugg

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 163 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #995547
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    Bit early – 28th JUNE 1942 was the date he went missing.

    My mistake – I had May 28 in my head for some reason. So the anniversary is a fortnight away.

    Been told that there has been no further damage.

    Everything else – well, its onging.

    Mark

    Thanks Mark, good to know.

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #1003796
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    It’s worth pausing to reflect that the seventieth anniversary of this incident passed just the other day.

    Lest we forget.

    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    The Vengeance is a remarkably large aeroplane, close up. I had the privilege of spending time with the Thomas family a number of times in the 80s and 90s, and learnt a great deal. May they rest in peace.

    Here’s the 1993 version of me engaging in some serious hangar-flying!

    http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr144/jollygreenslugg/Ha1.jpg

    The Camden Beau is A8-186 while the Moorabbin example is A8-328. We used to ground-run the one at Moorabbin, which was great fun. Sitting in the back with one engine growling away was a top experience for a teenager.

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #1015663
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    G’day folks,

    Wow, four days since the last post in this thread, and it has dropped to page four. That’s the sign of a healthy discussion forum.

    I’m guessing that nothing new has happened? Now that a positive identification has been made, I wonder if it brings a little more closure to the family. Obviously, location of F/Sgt Copping’s mortal remains will be the only thing to really give peace.

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: DIG WW2 tonight unearth a mk12 Spitfire #1017734
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    Wot, only one?!

    Ahem…

    In all seriousness, it sounds fascinating. I’ll have to see whether we can get it in the far-off parts of the former Empire.

    Cheers,
    Matt

    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    Two more X-planes, a little lower than the one pictured in the previous post.

    http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr144/jollygreenslugg/T6-2.jpg

    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    Two more X-planes, a little lower than the one pictured in the previous post.

    http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr144/jollygreenslugg/T6-2.jpg

    in reply to: What kind of reaction would this idea get? #1059191
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    As one who jumped in with silly jokes, I’ll be serious for a minute.

    I don’t understand the idea that one would need to recreate a modeller’s work on a real aeroplane. The modeller is recreating a scale version of an aeroplane at a given point in history, while an owner of a real aeroplane could also weather the aeroplane to represent a certain point in history. This, then, doesn’t need to refer to scale models at all.

    If model A in 2011 is a representation of aeroplane B in 1943, then aeroplane C in 2012 could also be painted up as aeroplane B in 1943. Even if model A was done before aeroplane C, the work done to aeroplane C is surely a representation of aeroplane B in 1943, not a representation of model A in 2011 which is also a representation of aeroplane B in 1943.

    Hmm, I think I’ve confused myself!

    I don’t mean to be smart here, I just don’t see that one would copy a scale replica of an original when one bypass the middle-man and just copy the original. I’m very happy to have my misconceptions set straight, by all means.

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: What kind of reaction would this idea get? #1059315
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    Oh, and the yellow prop tips should all be of slightly different sizes, and show evidence of having been applied by dipping the blade in a tin of paint!

    I think there’d need to be a shiny, clear coat over the insignia, extending about six inches outside the borders of the markings.

    *cough*

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: What kind of reaction would this idea get? #1059489
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    G’day folks,

    I’ll add my vote for a big, two foot-wide, gluey thumb print somewhere on the upper surface of the aeroplane!

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: Indian Hawker Tempests.. Interesting 'as found' pics. #1066411
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    G’day folks,

    Isn’t MW404 the one which has supposedly been purchased by an American fellow with dreams of returning it to flight with a 3350 up front?

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay Thread (August 2011) #1067284
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    Zenith carburettor to suit a Gypsy 1. Just the thing for that DH 60 project.

    http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Vintage-WW2-RAAF-RAF-Gypsy-1-Carby-DH60-Moth-RARE-/250992146602?pt=AU_Aircraft_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3a704c38aa

    It’d suit my project if I didn’t already have one and a spare.

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread Mk2 #1086340
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    …but operating costs can be halved with a few simple mods!

    http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr144/jollygreenslugg/ph.jpg

    in reply to: Now you don't have to buy the farm #1037757
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    G’day folks,

    I remember reading a fascinating article in an eighties issue of Flypast, about an English gent who bought a German Starfighter. The article described the complicated and round-about efforts required to get it to the UK.

    Is this the same machine?

    Cheers,
    Matt

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread Mk2 #1042581
    JollyGreenSlugg
    Participant

    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration was established in 1958. NASA’s predecessor was the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and unike many committees, NACA actually came up with a number of important developments.

    The Lockheed Vega was the first production aircraft with the drag-reducing NACA cowling. As another part of the link, the owner of the Guppy in the last shot is also the owner of this photo;

    http://i478.photobucket.com/albums/rr144/jollygreenslugg/Vega.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 163 total)