dark light

Graham.A

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 76 through 80 (of 80 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Turn RH tractor prop blade to LH tractor #863930
    Graham.A
    Participant

    So Ed, are you saying that us Typhoon/Beau people are basically hooped? We now need to source the roll forging forms and the hammer forging forms before we can progress far with getting Alloy blades?

    Might be back to thinking about composite blades then, although I have reservations about harmonics.

    On the plus side, I just scored (purchased) T.O 03-20CC-4, otherwise known as AP2121A&B, which is the Hamilton Standard interchangeability manual. I’ll post in the props thread. Nothing about blades in it and nothing about DH part numbers, but the 23EX is in there for you so it might be helpful for you Mossie/Lanc people, but maybe not so much help for us Typhoon/Halifax/Beaufighter people with the No 6 Hub Spline.

    Cheers
    Graham

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #869564
    Graham.A
    Participant

    We do have a GoFundMe in place for fundraising 🙂 Although at the moment we’re concentrating on purchasing materials for the structural rebuild.

    Feel free to donate though 🙂

    https://www.gofundme.com/hawkertyphoon if you’re interested.

    Cheers
    Graham

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #869631
    Graham.A
    Participant

    We have a spider to work with. Is it a good spider, only time and inspection will tell! Interesting picture of the Beau prop. It is identical to the Typhoon except for the blades and the pitch stops inside. I don’t care if it is a feathering prop or not, put the Typhoon pitch stop rings in and it won’t feather anymore 🙂

    I’m pushing Hamilton Standard to honour their Type Cert for the 23E prop (Type Cert P-603 Rev 16) as it clearly states on there that LH Props are certified. As the Type Cert holder, they are supposed to maintain ALL part numbers listed on the Type Cert.

    Of course, if they wanted to give me all the LH prop tooling I would be Ok with that too 😉

    For hubs, I would imagine that it is possible to machine a 23E50 (or 23EX) into a 23E60. Just a bigger hole heading to the engine.

    While we’re talking HS and DH props, didn’t you lovely people in Oz make a conversion chart for your Beau’s (fighter and fort) so that you could mix and match props to suite what you had in stock at the time? Anybody know if such a document is in existence?? I would dearly love to get my hands on it if it is.

    So just to reiterate, blades are the issue. As far as I know, we have everything else. And we even have access to a good blade, but that doesn’t mean we can easily get more made!

    Cheers
    Graham

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #870647
    Graham.A
    Participant

    It is a Typhoon blade. The prop chart I have says the Hub Spline is No 6, same as Beaufighter/Halifax/Stirling. Would that change the hub from a 23EX to something else, or does the 23EX cover different splines of “foreign” engines?

    Looking at the Ham Std 23E type cert, there aren’t any props of that diameter for that power. The closest 14′ prop is 1800 horses, while the 2200 horse prop is under 11′ in diameter. No wonder they went eventually went to 4 blades, still at 14′ diameter!

    I also see that the barrel numbers between Mossie/Lanc (P40000/D and P40000-1/D, which we know to be 23EX) are different to the props using the No6 spider spline. They all use the P40061/D and P40061-1D hub barrels. So perhaps not the 23EX prop after all!

    I need to find a 23EX or 23E prop so that I can compare hub barrels with the Typhoon hub.

    The link you posted is interesting. The Typhoon prop seems to have the best efficiency out of the props listed in the tests.

    in reply to: Commonality Between Hydromatic Propellor Models #870995
    Graham.A
    Participant

    Beermat, Yes, I’m dragging this thread up again 🙂

    With regard to your post on 4 April 2015, of how DH blade numbers work, would it be safe to assume the following for a DP4551157 blade.

    45 means Metal Hydromatic.
    5 means 5000 Series (although data I have says it is 5500 Series).
    11 is a Drawing Number fo rthe blade?
    5 means LHT configuration
    7 means that 7 inches have been removed from the design diameter of the prop, as this prop is 14ft, the design diameter would be 14″7 in standard form?

    Now to try and convert that to Ham Standard!

    Cheers
    Graham

Viewing 5 posts - 76 through 80 (of 80 total)