dark light

FlyingKiwi

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 166 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: even more amateur pics from downunder #1376102
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Thanks for posting.

    Love that last shot, wish I had something like it!

    Richard.

    in reply to: Oshkosh 2005 #1378924
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    I think the point here is that Oshkosh is not an airshow. Its a fly-in/convention, albeit on a large scale. The ‘show’ part of it is really to allow the pilots to have a bit of fun, spruce up their formation skills and entertain the public a little.

    Yes, that seems like a very accurate way of describing things.

    Richard.

    in reply to: Nellis AFB Threat Training Facility #1379822
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Interesting stuff Richard. One correction though: that MiG-23 is a MiG-23ML FLOGGER-G, not an -MLD FLOGGER-K. The kink in the wingroot which shows so clearly on your picture is actually the dogtooth of the variable wing panel. The MLD’s leading edge kink is far closer to the fuselage, where the TTF Flogger has a straight leading edge.

    Arthur,

    Thanks, I was hoping someone would be able to pick up on any inaccuracies in the article – though of course I was hoping even more that I hadn’t screwed up any of the facts 😉 !

    Anyway, I’ve fixed the page up already, because I’d hate to lead astray any of the impressionable!

    By the way, can anyone tell me what armaments those are beside the MiG 29?

    Richard.

    in reply to: Oshkosh 2005 #1379856
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    It is a good show, but beware of the unqualified superlatives! I lived in Chicago for several years, and went to four Oshkoshes, two days each time.

    This place certainly is heaven if you’re interested in general aviation. It’s very worthwhile if you’re interested in warbirds. It’s fair to pathetic if you want to see modern military hardware.

    If your main interest is in classic military aircraft, then think carefully about mortgaging the mother-in-law before spending the cash to cross the pond. Oshkosh is a huge and prestigious show, which guarantees that there are always interesting classic warbirds in attendance – but whether you’ll see them flying or not is a crap shoot. The warbirds part of the flying show is only ever 1.5 hours long, and usually consists of quite a few aircraft in the air at one time, doing circuits, usually with more than one circuit stacked above each other – world war two planes in one circuit, Vietnam FACs and so on in another. You’ll hardly ever see them banking and turning for photo passes as I experienced at the few UK shows I’ve attended. In 2003 I think it was, a short thunderstorm came through just before the simulated four-ship Reno Air Race, two planes took off but diverted to other air fields, the other two sat on the ground and waited it out. They then took off, did a simulated two-ship Reno Air Race and then did a simulated bombing run to light the Wall of Fire, which is normally done by a B-17 or B-25 during the warbirds display! Well, that day there was no warbirds display, they cancelled it because of the thunderstorm, which really didn’t last that long. And this a few hours after five or six general aviation planes had been doing endless circuits for 15 or 20 minutes in what amounted to little more than an extended sales pitch.

    If you’re a modern military enthusiast then the situation’s even worse. The show is so big that they certainly can’t allow one of the jet display teams to dominate it, so they never come. There’s usually a harrier doing a display, but often that’s about it, though they will usually have a transport like a C-17 or something. The announcers seem to have very little interest in the modern stuff – I took a crappy shot of an F-18 taking off at one show, the first thing I knew about it was when I heard him thundering down the runway, and the announcer casually mentioned the takeoff only after he’d rotated. One year during a long pause in the program they announced that the next day there’d be a B-2 flypast, but on the day his approach wasn’t mentioned until he was on top of the field, and although I was ready and took photos, most of the crowd was away from the flight line, because again this happened during a long pause in the show.

    Over the period I attended I developed very, very strong mixed feelings about this show. Yeah, it’s huge, but I got a distinct impression of arrogance on the part of the organizers, like we the public were so privileged to be allowed into their event. It’s sure expensive enough, at $30 a day (plus $5 for parking) it’s far more than any other airshow I know of in the States, and yet it’s my understanding that the EAA expects the warbirds and other fliers to volunteer their services without payment. I’ve heard various other grumblings from warbird owners too, but since this is such a prestigious show the organizers can get away with it. Finally, I was pretty annoyed in 2002 that they didn’t post a list of the warbirds which were expected to attend until 4 weeks before the show; so imagine how surprised I was when in 2003 they never posted any list at all! Yes, I know that aircraft often can’t make it because of mechanical problems and other reasons, but we’re adults, we understand that, and I would imagine that having a list of expected aircraft is a major factor for overseas visitors deciding whether to attend. This year they’re saying that the daily line-up will be posted “just prior to opening day”, tough luck if you need to make a decision a month or two in advance!

    Everyone’s entitled to their opinion, and my opinion is mixed. I’ve seen some amazing and rare aircraft flying there, and sat through long periods of boredom to do it. Your experience will depend largely on your expectations. Just be careful if someone tells you that this show is better than sex, the Beatles or God.

    Richard.

    in reply to: Another pic from the wee airshow #1390516
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Okay, I heard you say more….. 😀

    How could I not include a pic of the Dak….
    (and another P-40 one)

    TNZ

    Forget the Dakota, what about some more of the Catalina?

    Can you believe that is the only Catalina I’ve ever seen flying, sadly it wasn’t in military colours at the time. I’ve been to about 25 airshows in the USA in the last 7 years, and not a single Catalina at any of them, nor have I heard of any Catalinas flying in the States. I don’t doubt that there are some, I’m just amazed how rare they are.

    Richard.

    in reply to: Texas Oscar ground run photo via Oscar Duck #1390539
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    You meant to say ‘my’ photo I am sure 😉

    Dave

    Dave, yes, you’re quite right 😮 ! Actually, I assumed you weren’t a member of the forum, so I guess I was thinking “the photo to which Mike posted a link”!

    Nice to see a fellow kiwi on the forum; you must have been further along the runway than me, to have gotten that photo of it in the air.

    Richard.

    in reply to: Texas Oscar ground run photo via Oscar Duck #1390689
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Try here. 🙂

    Mike’s photo has it off the ground, mine sadly doesn’t, but here it is anyway:

    Oscar with tail raised

    Interesting to me that the new Oscar has a three bladed prop, I guess that’s a later model than the Wanaka Oscar.

    Richard.

    in reply to: 1 engined Lancs(2004 Zombie) #1414883
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    (here’s hoping I got my grammar right there :rolleyes: 😀 )

    Um, no, actually 😉 .

    The point that James D is making is that only humans can infer something. As a human, you can “arrive at the logical conclusion that” the Lancaster can maintain height on one engine, but the Lancaster itself does not “arrive at the logical conclusion that” the Lancaster can maintain height on one engine. Only thinking beings can infer things, because inference is a type of thinking. However the photo of the Lancaster can “signify” that the Lancaster can maintain height on one engine.

    It’s a sad day when an Antipodean such as myself is caught correcting native speakers of the Queen’s English! No wonder the Empire is gone 😎 .

    Richard.

    in reply to: Vandenburg AFB airshow #1438690
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    TJ,

    Thanks very much for that information! I’ll have to add that page to my airshow links page some time.

    Richard.

    in reply to: Vandenburg AFB airshow #1438847
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Glad you liked it, guys.

    Richard.

    in reply to: Tell me you wouldn't kick this out of bed?! #1358385
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Tell me you wouldn’t kick this out of bed?!

    It certainly does look nice – here are a few shots of it flying at the Prescott Air Fair in Arizona a month or two ago:

    http://www.richard-seaman.com/Aircraft/AirShows/Prescott2004/Highlights/index.html#Spitfire

    Richard.

    in reply to: Spitfire 18 TP280 #1360256
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Looking for some nice flying shots of this aircraft for the ol’ screensaver.

    Anyone got any? I can only find ground shots on the net 🙁

    Yeah, I’ve got one on my fighter wallpaper page:

    http://www.richard-seaman.com/Wallpaper/Aircraft/Fighters/index.html

    Enjoy!

    Richard.

    in reply to: Phancon 2004 – F-4 Phantom II convention #2621208
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Thanks Richard. Where you at the airshow in El Paso?

    Roger

    I had to get back to Palm Springs so I could work on Saturday and Sunday to make up for the time I took off to go to Phancon!

    Richard.

    in reply to: Phancon 2004 – F-4 Phantom II convention #2621617
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    Roger,

    You’ve got a great eye for the artistic shots, I missed them entirely. The ground-level views came out great, as did the shots from the rear!

    Richard.

    in reply to: Phancon 2004 – F-4 Phantom II convention #2622349
    FlyingKiwi
    Participant

    You would not want to give me some for my webpage. Especially the SEA drones would be appreciated.

    I’m sure that could be arranged. I’ll be at airshows for the next 3 weekends, but I should have time after that.

    Richard.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 166 total)