Well done! I particularly enjoyed the military helicopter shots.
Richard.
What aircraft were you in when taking these shots Richard?
BP.
I was in the rear gunner’s position of the B-25 “Executive Sweet”.
Richard.
Glenn,
Very nice work as usual! The vampires really do it for me!
Richard.
Excellent stuff as always, thanks for sharing!
Richard.
Great photos, particularly liked number 5, the one looking down onto the top of the Tornado!
Richard.
Fan-bloody-tastic pics! How did you get them?
Bri:cool:
There’s more about the show here:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Aircraft/AirShows/Gidroaviasalon2006/Main/index.html
Richard.
I don’t see USAF F-22’s, USMC AV-8B’s, and RAAF F-111’s?:confused:
That’s because this list is for the first session of this Red Flag, as it states at the top. Those aircraft will be involved in the second session, a week or two later.
Richard.
Great pics. Thanks for sharing. Are you shooting digital or film? And what lens did you shoot the Saber and p51 with? Sharp detail, beautiful lighting conditions!
Shooting here in Florida is very hit-n-miss. Especially in the mid day humidity! Everything gets soft and hazy unless you can almost touch it!
I’m gearing up for the big show at MacDill in March. hopefully the weather will cooperate.
Thanks, Chris. All the photos were shot with a Canon 20D digital camera and Canon 100-400mm image stabilized lens.
Richard.
Ken,
Yes, that must have been me – don’t think there were too many other Kiwis there!
Love your shots of the Be-12 in 2002, I was disappointed that it wasn’t there in 2006. Your shots inside the cockpit were great, too, looks like they provided better access back then.
I can’t see myself getting out there again anytime in the foreseeable future, I have plenty of Be-200/A-42 shots now and unless they pull a few rabbits out of hats then I can’t justify the trip from Los Angeles.
Richard.
Great pics Richard & a wonderful site…. 🙂
Welcome to the forums, glad you enjoyed the photos!
And thanks for all the other comments, guys.
Richard.
I recall reading that Hiroshima was chosen because it was relatively unscathed from the firebombing that had decimated other cities e.g. Tokyo.
Regards,
Dan
My understanding is that Hiroshima was deliberately left unbombed in order to be able to gauge the effect of a nuclear bomb strike on a city.
Here’s some informational displays from the museum in the Hiroshima Peace Park, complete with pontificating on my part:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Travel/Japan/Hiroshima/AtomicBombMuseum/IndividualArtifacts/index.html
Richard.
OK, folks, I broke down and did a search.
The guy’s name was Stanislav Petrov, here’s the Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov
Richard.
Richard – are you thinking of ABLE ARCHER 83, where the Sovs appear to have been under the impression that the US was on the verge of launching a strike because they suspected that the US was about to attack (misreading a complex exercise scenario as preparations for war)?
I don’t know, about all I remember about this incident is that one Russian guy took it on himself to halt a rapidly escalating chain of events which would have resulted in nukes being launched.
Of course these chains of events happened any number of times, but apparently this particular incident brought us especially close to global catastrophe.
Richard.
The Russian language lacks a definite article, i.e., the word “the”, and I’d be very surprised if Russian has an indefinite article, i.e., the word “a”.
If the language doesn’t have a word for “a” or “the” then a Russian cannot say “I have been hit by a lightning”, all he can say is “I have been hit by lightning” and whether it is “a” lightning, “the” lightning or just “lightning” has to be deduced from context.
I suspect the story is fake, however there is an apparently well-documented case of a Russian commander averting global meltdown by ignoring procedures and not launching missiles when all the systems were telling him that he should. I can’t remember his name, does anyone remember? I’m sure there must be an article on Wikipedia about this incident.
Incidentally, Latin and Chinese don’t have “the” either; Hebrew has “the” but not “a”. It’s incredibly hard for Russians and Chinese to learn how to use “the” in English, the rules are far, far more complex than you’d think.
Richard.
Yes, excellent stuff, especially like seeing the unusual types like the Caribou and F-111, and the colourful camouflage schemes, beats “low viz” any day!
Richard.