Excuse me for my ignorance, but why do you call them egg beaters?
It’s a comparison of the rotor blades spinning around, like the intermeshing paddles on the kitchen equipment used to beat or whisk eggs, for instance when making a pavlova or meringues from egg whites.
Richard.
Thanks for sharing these shots, it’s very nice to see some of the less common types, especially the Tunnan, Lansen and Draken, I didn’t realize there were any of these types still flying.
Richard.
Thanks guys, glads you enjoyed the photos. It’s just a shame about the lousy background on those head-on shots, maybe I can redo them next year with a nice blue background! 🙂
Richard.
Magnificent, Glenn, best photos I’ve seen from the show, even the ground-to-air shots are fantastic!
Richard.
The only Zero in the world still flying with its original engine is the one at Chino in California which flew last weekend. There are a couple of other Zero airframes on the circuit, but with Pratt and Whitney radial engines.
Richard.
This reminds me of the other thread floating around saying how bad media reporting is. On NBC news last night in the USA they said that the helicopter had crashed into the ocean, obviously not realizing that this is an amphibious helicopter. The news article you quoted says that it “tipped over”, but actually it’s pretty clear from the footage that he was trying to take off from the water, but pushed it too far forward and the main rotor hit the water because of it.
good to see that a new memeber wont be back because of the harsh people around here that feel put out because they have had to read a post on the wrong forum board…..ooooooooo….. that really ruined your day and wasted your time. people need to chill out a bit or boards and forums like this will die a death. help the guy, dont moan at him…. a simple… ‘sorry mate, wrong forum – try….’ might have worked better
Yes, you’re quite right and I apologise.
I suppose I was already a bit annoyed by the over-use of exclamation marks and capital letters in the very undescriptive title, and then to find that it was totally off-topic pushed me over the edge.
Richard.
And this has exactly what to do with photographing aircraft?
If you want to ask a question like this, put it in the “general discussion” forum and don’t waste people’s time here.
Richard.
Nice stuff, Roger!
Looking more and more professional all the time, it’ll give the print magazines a run for their money. 🙂
Richard.
Here are some basic photography tips:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Photography/PointAndShoot/index.html
and some tips specifically about photographing moving aircraft:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Photography/Airshows/index.html
I hope they’re helpful.
Richard.
Here’s the M-55 Geophysika in flight during MAKS 2005:
http://www.richard-seaman.com/Aircraft/AirShows/Maks2005/Highlights/index.html#M55Geophysica
Richard.
Just as a mildly interesting sideline to this topic, they wanted to use one of my P-51 photos as a backdrop for the Tom Cruise TV segment, but they needed to have a response within an hour – since they were in New York and I was travelling in a far flung region of the Philippines it just wasn’t going to happen that quickly! I probably received their email a good 12 hours after they sent it.
It’s a shame, I probably could have wrung a reasonable amount of cash out of them, especially if they were pressed for time! :dev2:
Richard.
Glenn,
Excellent stuff, love those ultra crisp photos!
Just a question, how does that Chipmunk fly with no propeller? 😉
Richard.
Seems they don’t care about the colours and markings, but the MiG and Sukhoi look fairly authentic. Not that can be said for the ‘Orange’ Wilga and ‘silver’ Zlin. Here they are in December 1989, probably when they were still in their original markings.
Those 1989 colours look a lot better than the current colours, as you say they probably don’t lose too much sleep over inauthentic schemes! And thanks for pointing out the broken JPEG, I’ve fixed that up.
Richard.
Yes, I was impressed by the pedestals, too; they looked very professional.
Incidentally, I should have asked whether anyone can recognize what type of aircraft the Israeli wreckage came from – in my ignorance I was thinking perhaps an A-4?
Richard.