Data plate special Spitfire?
I’d have one.
I’ve got a data plate and a crate of bits, just don’t know the identity…
Why are so many obsessed with this perceived problem ref identity? Surely it is more important to actually see airworthy Spitfires whatever the markings?
Some count rivets, some simply look up and enjoy.
Each to their own but I’m fairly certain who has the more fun
For me it’s all quite simple.
I paid and I saw it fly.
If I want to see it flay again, I pay again.
Having a flying Vulcan is priceless, something that seemed impossible just a short while ago. Some of us need to remember how lucky we are.
“BEAR with me”
very funny 😀
Here are a few I took in 1974 in Windsor, Ontario.
Bear with me if you have seen these before.
Mark
Bring on G-AIDN, surely an authentic civvy scheme if ever there was one..
🙂
ISBN 80-206-0247-X & ISBN 80-85280-17-5
http://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/SearchResults?bt.x=38&bt.y=12&isbn=ISBN802060247x&sts=t
Mark
Thanks Mark12
Shame, I was just about to say ‘best post ever’…
I’d better not now.
Must be a hell of a book
great photos (and video).
There’s a hell of a lot of BMWs in the background in pic 1. Was there a conference for salesmen on the airfield or something?
That’s me ‘told’ 🙂
Thanks!
Of topic but..
Where did they get a left hand drive black cab from? – I wasn’t aware they made them.
Just off to the Biggin Hill RAF Chapel.
Got my stiff upper lip ready – I’ll need it.
Blue skies everyone.
you could book the Kent Spitfire to do a flypast, Details are on their website http://www.kentspitfire.co.uk
There’s a picture in either ‘Biggin on the bump’ or ‘ The ghosts of Biggin Hill’ (I get them both mixed up) of one of the funeral processions resulting from one of the raids in August 1940
not much option for anything else – the main spars are rapidly turning into powder!
ok as a complete and utter spitfire novice whats the difference between all these marks?:confused:
I can tell the difference between a two seater and a single seater but why all the different canopy designs?(for the 2 seaters):confused:
The larger rear canopy is intended to give the back seat instructing pilot some forward vision.
The small rear canopy dates from the 80s when Nick Grace restored ML407. Perhaps he based this on a field modified MKIX that the Russians had in WW2. Some subsequent restorations have also used this idea – it looks better as it is lower, preserving more of the classic spitfire shape, but the view is said to be much worse than the large style and headroom is at a premium for taller people.
Anyway that’s the ‘why’. There are really only two styles you need to be aware of – small and large. Unless of course you spot a certain MKV with an extra front cockpit when digging in old books!